U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff on Tuesday issued his written opinion explaining why he dismissed former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's defamation lawsuit against The New York Times.
"At trial, plaintiff Sarah Palin wholly failed to prove her case even to the minimum standard required by law," Rakoff wrote.
On Monday, Palin's legal team asked the court for a new trial and to disqualify Judge Rakoff.
Palin argued that the fact several jurors received push notifications on their phones alerting them that the judge was going to throw out the case regardless of what the jury decided. The jury subsequently agreed with the judge and voted to dismiss the case.
In his written decision, Rakoff said the push alerts were "legally irrelevant."
Judge Rakoff on Sarah Palin jurors learning of his ruling:\n\n"[T]he Court is of the firm view that a few jurors\u2019 pre-verdict awareness of news about the Court\u2019s intended Rule 50 decision did not nullify the jury\u2019s verdict in any respect."\n\nIt's also "legally irrelevant," he added.pic.twitter.com/SHBLJ0xmOc— Adam Klasfeld (@Adam Klasfeld) 1646159769
NOW WATCH: 'It would take years': Jen Psaki reacts to Fox News host who wants Keystone pipeline to solve Ukraine crisis
'It would take years' Jen Psaki reacts to Fox host who wants Keystone pipeline solve Ukraine crisiswww.youtube.com
