Download Our App
Judge 'stormed ahead like a bull in a china shop' and shredded precedent to protect Trump: Former prosecutor
Donald Trump speaking with supporters at a "Save America" rally at Country Thunder Arizona. (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Judge 'stormed ahead like a bull in a china shop' and shredded precedent to protect Trump: Former prosecutor

On Monday, former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman reacted to the news that a Trump-appointed judge in Florida granted the former president's demand to pause the DOJ investigation into the classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, pending review by a special master for documents protected by attorney-client privilege and executive privilege.

The particular problem with the ruling by Judge Aileen Cannon, wrote Litman, is the ruling on executive privilege — which he said blows up legal understanding of any standards for when that protection applies.

"If this holds up, it's going to require the minting of a whole new area of law for the scope and boundaries of a former Pres's executive priv interests. How the hell is a Special Master supposed to call balls and strikes? This could be huge delays. I think DOJ needs to appeal," wrote Litman. "Cannon's opinion acknowledges that Rule 41 is reserved for exceptional circumstances and must be exercised w/ caution and restraint. Then she storms ahead like a bull in a china shop b/c it's possible that Trump may turn out to have some undefined interest down the line."

The ruling, continued Litman, "never comes close to holding there's an executive privilege interest here. But b/c of the gossamer possibility that there may be one down the line, she orders the gov to stop its review and orders a Special Master to review all docs under completely undefined legal standards." He added that "it reads as if she's never handled criminal cases before."

IN OTHER NEWS: Legal expert: Trump’s Pennsylvania speech could ‘put him in some legal jeopardy‘ – but there’s a bigger problem

"It's ironic but it's a total cluster of the doctrines and judicial moves conservatives say they hate about liberals: 'inherent supervisory authority,' sloppy standing analysis, huge remedy barely connected with the violation, holding X b/c can't be sure 'not X,'" Litman concluded.

The ruling effectively puts on hold the Justice Department's criminal investigation until a special master concludes the review — although Cannon also noted in the decision that the intelligence agencies can still access the documents as part of their probe into whether any classified information was compromised.

Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com.

Top Stories Recommended For You

YOUR OPINION MATTERS

Do you believe Congress will hold the Trump administration accountable?

VOTE NOW
Do you believe Congress will hold the Trump administration accountable?