Quantcast
Connect with us

Tech support for CISPA wobbles as Microsoft calls for privacy safeguards

Published

on

The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) may have a strong backing in the tech world, but that began to look increasingly tenuous this weekend after software giant Microsoft seemed to walk back its support for the bill, warning that the company would now push lawmakers for additional privacy safeguards.

That’s a big change for the company behind Windows and Xbox, which said in November that CISPA represented “an important first step towards addressing significant problems in cyber security,” and that Microsoft “applauds” lawmakers for pushing the bill.

The company’s initial letter, written by Microsoft’s U.S. VP for government affairs, has been a key document in support of the bill: Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), CISPA’s author, even prominently featured Microsoft’s support on his official website.

The software giant’s movement on the matter comes after a growing public outcry over CISPA and several recent amendments ostensibly meant to limit what information can be shared and how it can be used. Those provisions did not dislodge leading critics’ concerns about the bill, and actually appear to have grown the data the National Security Agency may collect to include information about violent threats made online and the distribution of child pornography.

Other companies still backing CISPA include Facebook, IBM, AT&T, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Oracle, Symantec and Verizon, but some of those firms could be reexamining their positions this week thanks to a statement from Microsoft over the weekend, which explained the company supports information sharing between the private sector and government so long as it can still keep private customer data private.

“Microsoft believes that any proposed legislation should facilitate the voluntary sharing of cyber threat information in a manner that allows us to honor the privacy and security promises we make to our customers,” Microsoft reportedly said..

ADVERTISEMENT

Microsoft’s budge from CISPA may force other companies that are officially neutral to take a public stand in the coming days. Following the statement, Microsoft rivals, particularly Google, will be hard pressed to speak out one way or another, especially since Google recently disclosed that its lobbyists helped lawmakers craft the bill.

Microsoft’s position isn’t an extreme one, either: President Barack Obama feels similarly, an administration official said last week. The president is expected to veto CISPA if the bill does not preserve “Americans’ privacy, data confidentiality, and civil liberties,” the administration said.

The bill’s proponents argue that CISPA’s data-sharing provisions are purely voluntary, and they believe that it’s a better alternative to a bill proposed by Sen. Joe Liebermann (I-CT), which would impose minimum network security requirements on virtually all major tech firms.

However, a group of 50 tech professionals recently disagreed with that characterization in an open letter to Congress beseeching lawmakers to turn it down, warning it would “nullify current legal protections against wiretapping and similar civil liberties violations.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Their letter cautions that Congress should not approve any legislation that “uses vague language” to describe IT threats and countermeasures, exempts “cybersecurity” efforts to relevant laws, provides immunity to private companies if they violate customers’ privacy or allows data to be collected in such a way that people who aren’t cyber criminals are swept up for other crimes.

Some of that “vague language” pertains to the definition of “cyber threat intelligence,” in which the bill includes “theft or misappropriation of private or government information, intellectual property, or personally identifiable information.” The bill also says that its provisions apply “nonwithstanding” any other privacy laws, which critics warn could make the bill a massive black hole in privacy law where anything goes under the justification of “cybersecurity.”

Though CISPA easily cleared the House, it will have a more difficult trek through the Senate, where two competing bills aim to accomplish these same ends. The Cybersecurity Act of 2012, proposed by Sen. Lieberman and widely supported by Democrats, would empower the Department of Homeland Security to require that major tech firms maintain a minimum level of network security. The Strengthening and Enhancing Cybersecurity by Using Research, Education, Information and Technology Act of 2012 (SECURE IT), introduced by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and widely supported by Republicans, would essentially do the same thing as CISPA.

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Charitable giving drops after GOP tax ‘cut’: report

Published

on

On Tuesday, the Washington Post reported that charitable giving dropped 1.7 percent last year, adjusted for inflation, even as the economy surged.

The likely culprit? The GOP tax law, according to a report from Giving USA.

Although corporate donations rose 2.9 percent and foundation gifts rose 4.7 percent in the previous year, charitable donations from individuals — which is where the bulk of actual charity takes place — dropped 3.4 percent, the first time this has happened since the financial crisis.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump campaign manager counting on Florida ‘Hispanic outreach’ as president trails in state poll

Published

on

In a deep dive into why Donald Trump is so focused on Florida as he begins his re-election campaign, Politico reports that polls show the president is behind in the must-win state and that his campaign manager believes he can salvage the state with multiple Hispanic outreach initiatives.

Noting that the president is kicking off his bid to hang onto the Oval Office in Orlando on Tuesday night, the report states that those close to Trump claim he has an obsession with the state.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

GOP pollster gets hilariously destroyed after blaming a broken elevator in his European hotel on ‘socialism’

Published

on

Republican pollster Frank Luntz drew hackles from across the internet on Tuesday after he blamed a broken elevator at a hotel in Austria on "socialism."

Writing on Twitter, Luntz complained that the elevator at the Hotel Imperial in Vienna, Austria has not been functioning for three straight days -- and said that the European social welfare state was responsible for this purportedly dire situation.

"Please don’t bring European-style socialism to America," Luntz pleaded.

I’m at the Hotel Imperial in Vienna, Austria. Almost 200 rooms… But the elevator has been broken for 3 days.

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

I need your help.

Investigating Trump's henchmen is a full time job, and I'm trying to bring in new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have more stories coming you'll love. Join me and help restore the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link

Investigating Trump is a full-time job, and I want to add new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have stories coming you'll love. Join me and go ad-free, while restoring the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link