Quantcast
Connect with us

Elizabeth Warren: Social Security is effective and popular, so let’s expand it

Published

on

Add Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) to the growing chorus of voices calling for the expansion of Social Security benefits.

The progressive favorite implored Democrats on the Senate floor Monday not to chain Social Security benefits to the rate of inflation or the rise in prices, which is known in shorthand as the Consumer Price Index.

Warren said it’s “simply not true” that these benefits must be chained to the CPI, as President Barack Obama has proposed, adding that “it’s just a fancy way of saying ‘cut benefits.’”

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead, she suggested that Social Security benefits should be raised to levels that account for the impact of inflation on seniors, which grows quickly under the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ experimental CPI-E metric.

“The absolute last thing we should do in 2013 — at the very moment that Social Security has become the principal lifeline for millions of our seniors — is allow the program to begin to be dismantled inch by inch,” Warren said.

The conventional wisdom in Washington has for years held that Social Security is unsustainable in its current form, and lawmakers have proposed raising the full retirement age even further, from 67 to 70.

But recent studies have shown 49 percent of middle-class workers could end up “poor or near poor” when they retire, with a tattered safety net, and more Americans over age 50 are accumulating debt rather than saving money for retirement.

An estimated 75 percent of Americans who were nearing retirement age in 2010 had less than $30,000 set aside for retirement.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We need to find ways to tackle the financial squeeze that is crushing our families,” Warren said. “We need to help families start saving again. We need to make sure that more workers have access to better pensions.”

But in the meantime, Warren said, Social Security benefits should be expanded – and about three-quarters of Americans would like to see lawmakers consider expanding benefits.

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) proposed a bill two years ago that would match Social Security benefits more closely with increasing medical care costs, but it never gained much traction until he reintroduced it in March.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK) proposed another bill in May that would lift cap on payroll taxes paid into the Social Security trust fund and calculate cost-of-living adjustments using the CPI-E.

Groups such as MoveOn.org, the Campaign for America’s Future, Patriot Majority and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee have been campaigning for expanded Social Security benefits since the re-introduction of Harkin’s legislation.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Social Security is incredibly effective, it is incredibly popular, and the calls for strengthening it are growing louder every day,” Warren said.

Harkin’s bill would increase benefits by about $60 per month for most seniors, which falls well short of the $11,000 proposed by the New America Foundation and the 20 percent across-the-board hikes proposed by some activists.

But Harkin’s bill, which has also drawn the support of Begich, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), has forced the issue into the political mainstream, and Warren’s backing turns the issue into a likely topic in the 2016 Democratic presidential race.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This summer no one even talked about (expanding benefits), but now we’re really building momentum,” Kimberly Fountain, campaign director for the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, told Raw Story.

Fountain said Harkin and Begich’s bills would give a worker $452 more per year by age 75 and $807 more by age 85, and Harkin bill would include an additional increase of almost $800 a year to Social Security recipients.

She added that “scrapping the cap” on payroll taxes would pay for the increases and ensure Social Security’s solvency beyond its current $2.7 trillion surplus.

Although Warren has said she doesn’t intend to run, she has been mentioned as a potential challenger to frontrunner Hillary Clinton, and she’s very popular among liberal activists.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even if she chooses not to make a White House bid, support turns Social Security expansion into an important campaign issue.

“Our first goal was to get this into the political dialogue, and I feel like we accomplished that,” Fountain said. “Our next goal is to give progressives a great issue to run on in 2014 and pave the way to helping our grandparents and veterans.”

Watch this video of Warren’s speech posted online by ProgressiveTVvideo:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘No one prevents a witness who can exonerate them from testifying’: Legal experts respond to acquittal vote of Trump

Published

on

It was never expected that President Donald Trump would be acquitted by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate for his crimes and the attempts to cover up his behavior by denying subpoenas.

While the impeachment trial is over, it's likely that hearings will continue. Given the conflicting arguments by the White House that impeachment are the only way subpoenas are valid, and also that the House should have used the courts to enforce subpoenas, it's likely that the House will continue to fight in court to obtain denied documents form the White House. The goal from the Trump legal team has been to stall as much as possible through the election.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Senate acquits President Donald Trump of two articles of impeachment — but it’s not bipartisan

Published

on

All Senate Democrats will vote to support the conviction and removal of President Donald Trump. To make matters worse, the conviction votes of the Senate will be bipartisan, thanks to Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) who decided that he will vote to convict.

Conservative Democrats were even willing to vote for impeachment less than 24 hours after Trump's State of the Union Address.

Other Republicans moderates decided that what Trump did was irresponsible and inappropriate but they voted against learning more information that could sway their opinions. As a result, Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) refused to vote to convict. Collins' vote was specifically controversial, as she's up for reelection in 2020 and her polling is not strong.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

West Virginia’s Joe Manchin will vote to convict Trump — and calls out the Senate for bad vote against witnesses

Published

on

In a statement from Sen. Joe Manchin's (D-WV) office, he revealed he agreed that it was time to vote to convict President Donald Trump.

"Voting whether or not to remove a sitting President has been a truly difficult decision, and after listening to the arguments presented by both sides. I have reached my conclusion reluctantly," Manchin said in the statement. "For the reasons above I must vote yes on the articles of impeachment. I take no pleasure at these votes, and I am saddened this is the legacy we leave our children and grandchildren. I have always wanted this president and every president to succeed, but I deeply love our country and must do what I think is best for the nation."

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image