Quantcast
Connect with us

Conservatives think zombie Scalia should decide cases — including this Bush voter fraud crusader

Published

on

Hans von Spakovsky (YouTube)

Another conservative lawyer is suggesting that Antonin Scalia should be allowed to decide U.S. Supreme Court cases from beyond the grave.

Hans von Spakovsky, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation and a former Bush administration official, argued that Scalia’s votes on some pending cases should be counted even after his Feb 13 death, reported Right Wing Watch.

ADVERTISEMENT

The conservative legal activist said the late justice had already heard oral arguments in some cases before the court, including Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, which could hobble public sector unions.

Von Spakovsky told religious right broadcaster Sandy Rios that Scalia had already cast his vote in conference after hearing arguments — and he said Chief Justice John Roberts had an “absolute obligation” to count the deceased jurist’s vote.

“After oral arguments before the court, the justices leave the courtroom and they go to a conference room in the Supreme Court building and they take a vote,” von Spakovsky said during the Feb. 15 interview.

“So that’s the point at which they know how a case is going to be decided and the chief justice then makes assignments of who will write the majority opinion and et cetera,” von Spakovsky continued. “I think the chief justice has an absolute obligation to give credit to Scalia’s vote in those cases that have already been decided, even if he didn’t write his opinion yet, because they know how he would have voted.”

However, justices can and do change their minds after voting in those conferences — as Roberts famously did when he upheld the Affordable Care Act.

ADVERTISEMENT

That historic fact — along with the general rule that “dead justices don’t vote” — was pointed out over the weekend to anti-government attorney Kory Langhofer, who also argued that Scalia should be able to enforce his conservative legal agenda from the afterlife.

Veteran Supreme Court attorney Roy Englert also made the same point shortly after Scalia’s passing, saying the “vote of a deceased justices does not count.”

It’s ironic that von Spakovsky would advocate for the voting rights of a dead jurist — because he spent his years in the U.S. Justice Department under Bush promoting the mythical epidemic of dead voters.

ADVERTISEMENT

Von Spakovsky, a frequent Fox News guest, is largely credited with turning the myth of widespread Democratic voter fraud — including votes cast on behalf of the deceased — into “Republican orthodoxy,” reported the New Yorker.

Perhaps if this argument doesn’t work, von Spakovsky can argue against the “one person, one vote” principle to justify giving a second vote to justices Clarence Thomas or Samuel Alito — who have been more reliably conservative than Scalia in recent years.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch this video report featuring von Spakovsky posted online by One America News Network:


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Agents of chaos’ — including Donald Trump — are taking ‘a wrecking ball to American institutions’: Famous documentary film maker

Published

on

Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin clearly hope to sow discord in the 2020 election — and the FBI has warned that the Russian government will try to interfere in this election just as it interfered in the 2016 election. Documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney discussed Russia’s election interference with CNN’s Alisyn Camerota during a September 23 appearance on the morning show, “New Day,” describing some of the things Russian operatives have been doing.

Gibney, creator of the documentary “Agents of Chaos,” explained, “For the 2016 election, past is prolong. I mean, so many things that the Russians did and the way they took advantage of certain flaws in our system in 2016 are now coming back to haunt us in 2020. In 2016, you know, Donald Trump on the stump kept saying: if I lose, the election is going to be rigged. And the Russians were in election systems not to flip votes, but to sow doubt on the legitimacy of what everyone saw as an inevitable Hillary Clinton win.”

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump’s most unhinged supporters paying $5 a pop to use special emojis on YouTube

Published

on

The pro-Trump cable network One America News is cashing in on QAnon conspiracy theorists on its YouTube channel.

OAN viewers can pay $4.95 a month to become "members" of the right-wing channel, which then allows them to use customized emojis to signal their recognition of the conspiracy theory's lore, reported The Daily Beast.

"It’s not clear how many people have signed up for the OAN YouTube membership, when OAN started offering the emojis, or how many of those sign-ups were driven by the opportunity to use QAnon emojis," writes The Beast's Will Sommer. "But the creation of the emojis reflects a decision to monetize, not expel, the conspiracy believers. If QAnon fans are going to spam QAnon in the OAN comments, it seems the network has decided they might as well get some money out of it."

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Former federal prosecutor explains how AG Barr could help Trump steal the election — and take the US to ‘a very dark place’

Published

on

Between the coronavirus pandemic, civil unrest in major U.S. cities, huge anti-racism protests, bitter political divisions, a heated Supreme Court battle and President Donald Trump’s ruthless voter suppression efforts, the United States’ 2020 presidential election is turning out to be even more chaotic than the elections of 2000 and 1968. Trump has a devoted loyalist in U.S. Attorney General William Barr, and former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade discusses the effect he could have on the 2020 election in a disturbing op-ed published in the Washington Post on September 22.

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE