Quantcast
Connect with us

Conservatives think zombie Scalia should decide cases — including this Bush voter fraud crusader

Published

on

Another conservative lawyer is suggesting that Antonin Scalia should be allowed to decide U.S. Supreme Court cases from beyond the grave.

Hans von Spakovsky, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation and a former Bush administration official, argued that Scalia’s votes on some pending cases should be counted even after his Feb 13 death, reported Right Wing Watch.

ADVERTISEMENT

The conservative legal activist said the late justice had already heard oral arguments in some cases before the court, including Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, which could hobble public sector unions.

Von Spakovsky told religious right broadcaster Sandy Rios that Scalia had already cast his vote in conference after hearing arguments — and he said Chief Justice John Roberts had an “absolute obligation” to count the deceased jurist’s vote.

“After oral arguments before the court, the justices leave the courtroom and they go to a conference room in the Supreme Court building and they take a vote,” von Spakovsky said during the Feb. 15 interview.

“So that’s the point at which they know how a case is going to be decided and the chief justice then makes assignments of who will write the majority opinion and et cetera,” von Spakovsky continued. “I think the chief justice has an absolute obligation to give credit to Scalia’s vote in those cases that have already been decided, even if he didn’t write his opinion yet, because they know how he would have voted.”

However, justices can and do change their minds after voting in those conferences — as Roberts famously did when he upheld the Affordable Care Act.

ADVERTISEMENT

That historic fact — along with the general rule that “dead justices don’t vote” — was pointed out over the weekend to anti-government attorney Kory Langhofer, who also argued that Scalia should be able to enforce his conservative legal agenda from the afterlife.

Veteran Supreme Court attorney Roy Englert also made the same point shortly after Scalia’s passing, saying the “vote of a deceased justices does not count.”

It’s ironic that von Spakovsky would advocate for the voting rights of a dead jurist — because he spent his years in the U.S. Justice Department under Bush promoting the mythical epidemic of dead voters.

ADVERTISEMENT

Von Spakovsky, a frequent Fox News guest, is largely credited with turning the myth of widespread Democratic voter fraud — including votes cast on behalf of the deceased — into “Republican orthodoxy,” reported the New Yorker.

Perhaps if this argument doesn’t work, von Spakovsky can argue against the “one person, one vote” principle to justify giving a second vote to justices Clarence Thomas or Samuel Alito — who have been more reliably conservative than Scalia in recent years.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch this video report featuring von Spakovsky posted online by One America News Network:


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Bulletproof from a pardon’: Fox News analyst says judge in Stone case just made things tough for Trump

Published

on

In the wake of Roger Stone's sentencing of 3.5 years in prison this Thursday, Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano posited that U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson's choice to go along with Attorney General Bill Barr's sentencing recommendation could have been an effort to pardon-proof the sentence from President Trump.

"[Jackson's] trying to make this bulletproof from a pardon," Napolitano said. "Because she went along exactly with what [Barr] requested."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Adam Schiff sends signal that a Roger Stone pardon would be another impeachable offense

Published

on

Rep. Adam Schiff suggested that a presidential pardon for Roger Stone would be an impeachable offense.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson sentenced the longtime Republican operative to 40 months in prison, saying Stone had lied to Congress and threatened a witness to cover up possible wrongdoing by President Donald Trump -- and Schiff sent a warning against a pardon.

"Roger Stone was found guilty of lying to Congress and threatening a witness," Schiff tweeted.

Schiff, who led the impeachment inquiry and trial, agreed with Jackson -- whose language echoed the lawmaker's "corrupt scheme and cover-up" indictment during the Senate trial.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

WATCH: Roger Stone greeted with ‘Lock Him Up!’ chants after getting sentenced to 40 months

Published

on

Trump ally Roger Stone frequently led chants of "Lock her up!" about Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign -- but on Thursday, the table decisively turned.

After Stone was sentenced to 40 months in prison for charges of perjury, witness tampering, and obstruction of justice, a crowd of people greeted the right-wing dirty trickster by chanting, "Lock him up!" outside the courthouse.

At least one supporter of President Donald Trump tried to get a "pardon" chant going, but they were drowned out by the louder "Lock him up" chants.

Watch the video below.

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image