Four remaining holdouts negotiated the terms of their surrender in a tense conversation with a Nevada lawmaker overheard by tens of thousands of people online.
The bizarre spectacle was at times dramatic, heart-rending and farcical, as the armed occupiers struggled to find a dignified exit to the 16-day holdout that may define — or possibly end — their lives.
The four — Sean Anderson, Sandy Anderson, David Fry and Jeff Banta — had remained at the Malheur National Wildlife Preserve for more than two weeks after the arrests of the group’s top leaders and the fatal shooting of another.
They camped in frigid temperatures in an RV turnaround area near the visitors center where the other militants had lived and where supplies were kept.
— The Oregonian (@Oregonian) February 11, 2016
FBI agents tightened their grip on the occupied wildlife refuge late Wednesday after one of the militants rode an ATV past a checkpoint set up by authorities, and the militants called Gavin Seim, an associate in Washington who set up a live stream of their conversation.
That call was joined by Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore, who sped across Oregon with militant leader Ammon Bundy’s attorney, and the Rev. Franklin Graham, who the holdout militants had asked to negotiate with the federal government on their behalf.
Many listeners faulted Fiore for her failure to urge the militants to surrender peacefully, but it soon became clear she had been tasked by federal authorities with gaining their trust and keeping them calm.
Prayers seemed to calm the militants initially, but they soon complained they were tired of praying even as they made frequent references to religion.
“The Bible says we have a right to defend ourselves,” Sandy Anderson said.
— Lincoln Graves (@LincolnGraves) February 11, 2016
The first couple of hours were marked with frequent outbursts from Fry, who the other militants frequently ordered to stay calm, but it eventually became clear that Sandy Anderson might have been the holdout most willing to die.
She repeatedly — and emphatically — said she would not accept any terms that involved her arrest, and she waved off appeals to think about her family.
Anderson said she and her husband, Sean, were each estranged from their children and suggested they had nothing to live for outside the nature preserve.
Fiore and the militants repeatedly assured themselves they were law-abiding citizens, despite the charges that are likely looming over them.
The holdouts passionately detailed their objections to what they saw as government overreach, complaining about Common Core education standards, the estate tax and costly gun control laws they believed had been implemented by President Barack Obama.
Many of their objections were based on falsehoods or erroneous understandings of actual events — much like the highly specific and legally dubious interpretation of the U.S. Constitution they share with the other militants.
The holdouts questioned whether the FBI had any jurisdiction over the wildlife refuge, arguing that their understanding of the Constitution forbade most federal land ownership — a claim legal scholars dismiss as ridiculous.
The militants desperately sought closure, but none of them seemed to know what that would look like.
“Just kill us and get it over with,” Sandy Anderson screamed at one point.
But they also believed they held enough leverage to negotiate a surrender that would allow them to walk off the wildlife refuge with their guns and without facing criminal charges.
“I’m tired of arguing this with people — I don’t have to go to court,” Sandy Anderson complained at one point.
Somehow, the militants believed this position amounted to a concession on their part and demanded the FBI make a concession of their own.
In the end, the militants agreed to surrender Thursday morning, after Fiore and Graham arrived.
The nearly five-hour call ended with some light chat as Seim readied a recorded song by the Sharp Family Singers, a religious troupe that had visited the occupants before their leaders were arrested and most of them fled.
Listen to the entire recording posted online by Gavin Seim:
Fox News pundit: Tax returns ruling against Trump is ‘a win for him’ and ‘will help the president’
Fox News pundit Katie Pavlich argued on Thursday that a Supreme Court ruling which opened the door for prosecutors to obtain Donald Trump's tax returns is actually "a win" for the president.
Pavlich made the remarks after the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance can request the president's tax records in a public corruption case.
"I think it's a win and a little bit of a loss for President Trump," Pavlich explained. "In the sense that he will now have to deal with a number of these issues and other presidents in the future will as well, whether they are valid requests for information or not and whether they are being made for political for reasons or for valid criminal investigations."
‘All nine justices’ rejected Trump’s claim of absolute immunity: CNN’s Toobin
On Thursday, following the Supreme Court's 7-2 ruling that President Donald Trump's taxes are not immune from the Manhattan criminal investigation, CNN chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin broke down the implications of the decision.
"All nine justices reject the position put forth by the president's lawyers in this case," said Toobin. "All nine justices say that the president does not have absolute immunity from a subpoena, and all nine agree that the case has to go back to district court."
"This is a legal defeat for the president, but it may be a practical victory," added Toobin. "The idea that the president can't be subpoenaed is completely rejected but the Supreme Court, and that even the two dissenting justices agree on ... the practical victory for the president is that the legal proceedings will continue. It seems unlikely, given this opinion, that the president will ultimately be able to stop the disclosure of these events to the grand jury in Manhattan, but it's going to take time. I mean, this process will begin again. The district court will get briefings. They may hear evidence. That will be appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and then losing party will likely go back to the Supreme Court. All of this will take a while."
Mask-free UFC fighter punches and hurls racial slurs at older man for ‘touching’ him at restaurant
UFC fighter Mike Perry was seen on video punching an older man for allegedly touching him. Perry, who is white, can also be heard using the N-word multiple times.
According to ESPN, the incident occurred at Table 82 in Lubbock, Texas on Wednesday.
In a video shared on social media, Perry appears irate as he is ushered out of the restaurant.
Lubbock police officers who arrived on the scene declined to arrest Perry but said that an investigation into the incident is ongoing.