Quantcast
Connect with us

CNN host grills GOP lawmaker over Benghazi report: What’s the point of any of this?

Published

on

CNN’s Carol Costello asked a Republican congressman to explain the purpose of the months-long Benghazi investigation — but he was unwilling or unable to suggest any substantial changes based on the report’s findings.

Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) appeared Tuesday morning on CNN Newsroom, where he compared the Benghazi report issued by House Republicans to a U.S. Supreme Court decision, reported Media Matters.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You have a majority opinion, sometimes you have concurring opinions, you have a minority opinion,” Roskam said.

House Democrats released a separate report clearing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of all wrongdoing, but some conservative members of the Benghazi committee released an addendum because they didn’t think the final GOP report was critical enough of the Democratic presidential candidate.

“Conservative Republicans on the committee are going to release their own addendum,” Costello said. “They don’t agree with the report either.”

Roskam insisted those dissenters agreed with most of the findings, but they wrote an additional report to “highlight and bring into contrast some of the political issues” suggested in the report.

“Washington failed,” Roskam said. “Washington completely was acting as if that was somebody else’s family that was under attack. The officials in Washington, from the State Department to the White House to you name it, the Department of Defense, were slow-moving. There was never a force that was going to be deployed to Benghazi. That’s what the report finds. Never. Isn’t that shocking? Isn’t that jarring?”

ADVERTISEMENT

Costello pointed out that an Accountability Review Board had made 29 recommendations to avoid similar mistakes, and the State Department had already adopted 28 of those.

“Now that the report is out, what’s the endgame?” Costello said. “What should happen? What needs to happen? Should there be more recommendations? Should the State Department change – institute changes, more changes? Like, what’s the endgame here?”

Roskam said Republican lawmakers simply wanted to gain “a thorough understanding of what actually happened,” and he urged Americans to spend “several hours” reading the 800-page report to understand what mistakes were made.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So should there be consequences — what consequences?” Costello asked. “I mean, should somebody be charged for — what consequences should there be for this?”

The congressman said the consequences had already been borne by the families of the four Americans killed in the 2012 attack, but Costello pressed on.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I guess I’m talking about who should be punished, for lack of a word, because of all of these mistakes that were made?” she said.

Roskam again declined to offer specifics about possible changes or consequences.

“The entire system failed them,” Roskam said, and then described some of the bureaucratic and tactical errors that he believes contributed to the deaths.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Those types of things are absurd — they’re scandalous,” Roskam said. “But you know who bears the burden? The people who bear the burden are the ones who lost their lives, and that’s the shame of this.”

Watch the entire segment posted online by Peter Roskam:


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump’s attack on Sotomayor and Ginsburg backfires as people point out conservative justices’ conflicts of interest

Published

on

This Monday, President Trump attacked liberal Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Ruth Bader and demanded that they recuse themselves from any cases that involve him.

“‘Sotomayor accuses GOP appointed Justices of being biased in favor of Trump,’” Trump tweeted while citing Laura Ingraham of Fox News. “This is a terrible thing to say. Trying to ‘shame’ some into voting her way? She never criticized Justice Ginsberg when she called me a ‘faker’. Both should recuse themselves on all Trump, or Trump related, matters!”

Continue Reading

2020 Election

If Bloomberg is so rich, why does he steal workers’ wages?

Published

on

Michael Bloomberg has been pummeled over the treatment of women at his media and data company. Yet that is not the only blemish on the employment record of Bloomberg L.P. The company also has a serious problem with wage theft.

Violation Tracker lists a total of $70 million in penalties paid by Bloomberg for wage and hour violations, putting it in 32nd place among large corporations. Yet many of the companies higher on the list – such as Walmart, FedEx, and United Parcel Service – employ far more people than the roughly 20,000 at Bloomberg.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Tennessee Christians are replacing health insurance with ‘sharing ministries’ that require people to live Godly lives: report

Published

on

christian evangelicals raising hands in praise prayer

On Tuesday, Brett Kelman of The Tennessean wrote about a spike in the uninsured rate in Tennessee — driven in part by 31,000 Christians in the state foregoing health insurance in favor of church-backed "sharing ministries."

These ministries are pitched as alternatives to medical coverage, but they are not health insurance at all — rather, they are better described as religious crowdfunding ventures where fellow congregants may cover your medical bills. But the key word is may. According to Kelman, "these groups don't actually guarantee any payment, and if you break their rules by smoking pot or having unmarried sex, you are on your own."

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image