Quantcast
Connect with us

Kellyanne Conway has Twitter tantrum against media for calling BS on ‘Bowling Green Massacre’

Published

on

Kellyanne Conway is still getting mocked for citing a fictitious massacre in Bowling Green, Ken., to justify President Donald Trump’s travel ban on seven Muslim-majority countries.

Conway decided to shoot back at her media critics on Friday morning by sending out a series of tweets that defended the basic premise of her argument, while also acknowledging that there was never a terrorist attack in Bowling Green.

ADVERTISEMENT

“On Hardballan old ABC News report, I meant to say ‘Bowling Green terrorists,'” Conway said, before linking to about an FBI investigation into refugees living in Bowling Green who were suspected of having terrorist ties.

The FBI in 2013 decided to investigate whether “dozens” of terrorists had inadvertently been let into the United States while posing as Iraqi refugees. The FBI began the investigation after it was revealed that two Iraqi refugees in Bowling Green were caught sending money to fund al Qaeda in Iraq to use in the terrorist group’s fight against the American military.

As Toronto Star reporter Daniel Dale points out, however, the FBI investigation didn’t turn up any additional terrorists posing as refugees, despite fears that several more had been mistakenly let into the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nonetheless, Conway decided that this vindicated her, and she called out a reporter on The Today Show who criticized her for falsely describing the incident as a “massacre.”

ADVERTISEMENT

She then went on to praise herself for showing “class” and “grace” in dealing with reporters who make mistakes, whereas most reporters publicly mock her when she makes mistakes.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

George Conway reveals Trump is being shunned by law firms because young lawyers ‘want nothing to do with him’

Published

on

Conservative attorney George Conway asserted in a column over the weekend that President Donald Trump's history of mistreating law firms is catching up with him.

In a Sunday op-ed for The Washington Post, Conway explains that Trump is now faced with sparse choices for legal representation in his impeachment trial after years of not paying attorneys and generally being a bad client.

Pointing to Trump's choice of Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr, Conway writes:

?The president has consistently encountered difficulty in hiring good lawyers to defend him. In 2017, after Robert S. Mueller III became special counsel, Trump couldn’t find a high-end law firm that would take him as a client. His reputation for nonpayment preceded him: One major Manhattan firm I know had once been forced to eat bills for millions in bond work it once did for Trump. No doubt other members of the legal community knew of other examples.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Texas GOPer Cornyn blames Trump’s problems on campaign ‘grifters’ — then calls Giuliani ‘not relevant’

Published

on

Appearing on CBS's “Face the Nation," Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) attempted to blame Donald Trump's impeachment problems on "grifters" who found a way to attach themselves to the now-president when he began to run for president.

Speaking with host Margaret Brennan, Cornyn was asked about allegations made by Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas that have implicated not only the president but Vice President Mike Pence and senior White House officials in an attempt to strongarm the leaders of Ukraine in return for military aid.

"Doesn't it trouble you that [Parnas] was working so closely with Rudy Giuliani, who was acting on the president's behalf and saying he was acting on the president's behalf?" host Brennan asked. "

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘No sound basis’: Georgetown law professor explains why Alan Dershowitz will crumble under Senate questioning

Published

on

Georgetown law professor John Mikhail suggested on Sunday that the portion of President Donald Trump's defense which is being covered by Alan Dershowitz to fail because it has "no sound basis" in history and law.

"There is no sound basis for Alan Dershowitz to claim that abuse of power is not an impeachable offense. In addition to being at odds with common sense, this claim is contradicted by a clear and consistent body of historical evidence," Mikhail stated.

The law professor cited the impeachment of Warren Hastings in the 1780s.

"Some of the best evidence comes from the case of Warren Hastings, which informed the drafting Art. II, Sec 4," Mikhail wrote. "The fact that he was not guilty of treason, but still deserved to be impeached, was a major reason 'other high crimes and misdemeanors' was added to the Constitution."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image