Quantcast
Connect with us

‘I’m speechless’: Anderson Cooper dumbfounded by Trump just now realizing diplomacy is ‘not so easy’

Published

on

A Wall Street Journal interview with Donald Trump left Anderson Cooper speechless on Wednesday after the president said a ten-minute conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping made him realize a solution to North Korea is “not so easy.”

“After listening to the Chinese president explain the history of China and North Korea for about ten minutes he, ‘realized it’s not so easy,’” Cooper explained, before turning to former U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers.

“Is that—I’m speechless,” Cooper admitted “I don’t know why I’m reacting like this.”

Chief International correspondent Christiane Amanpour noted Trump “said the same thing about healthcare” in February when he claimed “nobody knew” reforming the Affordable Care Act “could be so complicated.”

“Do you worry that he has no real positions?” Cooper asked Rogers. ”That basically he bends one way or the other depending on who the last person who gave him a 10-minute lecture on the history of some country is?”

ADVERTISEMENT

“I mean, the NATO guy was here today and so now NATO is indispensable, but when the NATO guy leaves, is that still going to be the position?” Cooper wondered.

“Obviously I can’t speak for the Trump administration,” Rogers said.

“Sorry, I don’t know why I’m reacting like this, I just find it amazing,” Cooper explained.

“It’s frustrating,” Rogers suggested.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It is frustrating,” Amanpour agreed.

Cooper likened the situation to Trump, during the campaign, touting that we should “take the oil” from countries we invade—a war crime. Cooper said at the time, when Trump was confronted about it he would berate those who didn’t agree with his ‘take the oil’ philosophy.

“‘You’re an idiot that you don’t understand or you do understand, but you’re just pretending you don’t,’” Cooper recalled Trump saying.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But you know what, you can’t take the oil and he now knows that and he probably knew it then.”

Watch the video below, via CNN:


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Arizona ‘museum fire’ balloons to over 300 acres — and they’re evacuating the area

Published

on

A massive fire has grown much faster than anticipated, just north of Flagstaff, Arizona. Brady Smith, Coconino County National Forest, told ABC15 that they have at least 200 staff on the ground and planes dropping fire retardant.

AZCentral reported that the fire located in the Dry Lake Hills.

Continue Reading

Facebook

WATCH: Trump apologist goes down in flames when he claims Democrats don’t get attacked like Trump

Published

on

Former White House advisor Matt Mowers went down in flames trying to claim Democrats call everyone a racist when they don't agree with them. He had to go back 15 years to find an example, but still never fully explained what the example was.

In a panel discussion with MSNBC's Kasie Hunt, Mowers employed the "what about" strategy, spinning the idea that Trump's racist remarks were justified because Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) used an anti-Semitic trope. To be fair, Omar apologized and met with community leaders and officials to better understand anti-Semitism. Trump can't even admit when he did something wrong, much less racist.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Congress should ask Mueller these specific questions about Trump’s involvement with Russia: Conservative columnist

Published

on

Conservative Never-Trump columnist Jennifer Rubin outlined the essential questions that Democrats should ask special counsel Robert Mueller in an op-ed for the Washington Post.

"Rather than engage in the normal scattershot questioning punctuated by speechifying, the House Judiciary Committee should assign its able attorney Norman Eisen to conduct the questioning," proposed Rubin. "Members could then follow up with additional questions.'

One question she proposed asking: "Mr. Mueller, the attorney general said you did not find 'collusion.' However, you did not look for collusion. Please explain what you looked for and how that differs from [Attorney General William] Barr’s assertion that you essentially cleared President Trump of collusion?"

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image