Quantcast
Connect with us

MSNBC analyst argues Trump’s CIA appointment of Haspel is a sign that torture is acceptable again

Published

on

Speaking on MSNBC on Tuesday afternoon, an expert in CIA interrogation techniques claimed that the selection of Gina Haspel, who oversaw the torture of terrorism suspects following 9/11, was a sign from the president that he has no problem with returning to what the CIA euphemistically calls “enhanced interrogation techniques.”

Speaking with host Katy Tur, author John Nixon– who wrote “Debriefing the President: The Interrogation of Saddam Hussein” — said that Haspel has a long tenure with the CIA, which included some of the “darkest events” in the agency’s history, after calling her a bad choice to replace outgoing CIA Director Mike Pompeo.

“Why does she enjoy such broad support among the intelligence community if you think she’s such a bad choice?” Tur asked after listing off several past directors who praised her selection.

“I think she’s not a very good choice at all,” Nixon quickly responded. “I think there are probably others that might have been a better choice. I will say this: her appointment kind of troubles me and it shows that the Trump administration apparently is most interested in the CIA in terms of operations. This appointment and a few others that Trump has made during his presidency has always favored the operational side. Therefore, I take that as being that the Trump administration is not really interested in the information that they can get from the CIA analysts, but they do want to use the agency as a weapon against their adversaries.”

“Donald Trump did say on the campaign trail that he thought waterboarding should come back, he would bring it back and he would want to do worse because what ISIS is doing isn’t fair and we shouldn’t be playing by any sort of rules,” Tur pressed. “He got large cheers for this. Do you think this is an indication that maybe we’re going back in that direction of enhanced interrogation, of waterboarding, of torturing our detainees?”

“I certainly would hope not,” Nixon replied. ” But if you’re going to bring it back, you have to have people to carry it out and, personally, if I were working at the CIA and somebody said, ‘I want you to waterboard someone,’ I would say, ‘first, you have to give me a get out of jail card because I’m not doing that”

ADVERTISEMENT

“And, you know, the thing is, this is an immoral program and it also doesn’t produce the results that you want,” he elaborated. “You want to get information off the battlefield from detainees. there are other ways to do it. you don’t have to waterboard and torture people.”

“Isn’t naming her to be the next director of the CIA basically giving her a get out of jail free card?” the MSNBC host asked.

“Naming her to be the next CIA director is this,” Nixon stated. “I think it sends the message that the ends justifies the means. We don’t care how you do anything, as long as you get the end result. That is a very dangerous proposition, because in the history of the CIA, the times the agency has gotten in trouble and gotten presidents in trouble has been when this has been the operating ethos.”

Watch the video below via MSNBC:

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Hope Hicks denied under oath knowing about Trump’s hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels

Published

on

Former White House communications director Hope Hicks on Wednesday denied under oath knowing anything about the hush-money scheme set up by former Trump "fixer" Michael Cohen to pay off President Donald Trump's former mistresses.

"Hicks told lawmakers today that she did not have knowledge during 2016 campaign of hush-money payments made in run-up to election," reports CNN's Manu Raju. "Also she wouldn’t discuss what she learned about those payments during her time at White House because of immunity claims."

Hicks told lawmakers today that she did not have knowledge during 2016 campaign of hush-money payments made in run-up to election, per sources. Also she wouldn’t discuss what she learned about those payments during her time at WH bc of immunity claims https://t.co/GZWqzCzpGX

Continue Reading

Facebook

Federal Reserve chair defiant in face of Trump threats: ‘The law is clear — I have a four-year term’

Published

on

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell sounded a defiant note on Wednesday as he announced that there would be no further cuts to interest rates for the time being.

Even though President Donald Trump has been publicly calling for a rate cut to spur additional economic growth ahead of his reelection campaign, Powell kept interest rates at their current level and signaled that he did not foresee any interest rate cuts for the rest of the year.

Powell was asked by a reporter if he was concerned about being "demoted" by Trump in the wake of this announcement, the Federal Reserve Chairman said he wasn't worried.

Continue Reading
 

CNN

John Dean explains the big mistake Hope Hicks made by stonewalling Congress

Published

on

Former White House counsel John Dean, a key figure in the Watergate scandal, said Wednesday on CNN that there was a serious flaw in the attempt to prevent longtime Trump confidant Hope Hicks from testifying to Congress.

White House lawyers have asserted that Hicks has absolute immunity and is not legally required to testify about her time as Trump's director of communications. Hicks testified Wednesday during a closed-door hearing before the House Judiciary Committee — where she reportedly refused to answer questions about her White House job.

"Privilege is not being asserted here. Instead, the White House says that Hicks has absolute immunity regarding the time that she spent at 1600 Pennsylvania. Does absolute immunity even exist? And if so, can you explain to me the difference between the two?" CNN host Brooke Baldwin asked Dean.

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

I need your help.

Investigating Trump's henchmen is a full time job, and I'm trying to bring in new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have more stories coming you'll love. Join me and help restore the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link

Investigating Trump is a full-time job, and I want to add new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have stories coming you'll love. Join me and go ad-free, while restoring the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link