Responding to reports that yet another appointee in Donald Trump’s administration is a white nationalist, New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg made an only-slightly-hyperbolic reference to the White House’s diversity problem.
In mid-August, former Trump aide Omarosa Manigault-Newman revealed that when she left the White House, she was the only black person “at the table” — and that no African Americans have been hired in her stead.
Days after Manigault-Newman’s revelation, White House speechwriter Darren Beattie was outed as having ties to white nationalists and was subsequently fired.
Just over a week later, The Atlantic‘s Rose Grey revealed that former Homeland Security policy analyst Ian Smith is also tied to prominent white nationalists like Richard Spencer and a former leader of a since-disbanded neo-Nazi group. Grey confirmed to MSNBC host Chris Hayes that Smith was a “political appointee” and not a career civil servant.
“I think that one conclusion we might want to draw from this is that this is a white nationalist administration,” Goldberg said in an interview with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes. “Not everybody in the administration is a white nationalist but it’s certainly an administration that has white nationalist policies [and] white nationalist sympathies.”
The columnist pointed to Trump’s tweet promoting the “white nationalist conspiracy theory” that a “genocide” of white farmers in South Africa is taking place before directing the State Department to investigate the widely-debunked claim.
“There are, I would wager, more outright white nationalists in this administration than there are black people,” Goldberg said.
Watch below, via MSNBC:
Canada is taking advantage of Trump’s tariff pratfalls by scooping up new trade partners: report
As American manufacturers reel and U.S. farmers see their economic well-being being destroyed by Donald Trump's trade wars, the Canadian government is stepping into the breach and boosting their own trade relations, reports Politico.
As part of their Global Translations podcast, Politico notes that countries -- and manufacturers -- are not standing by helplessly as Trump threatens and changes directions on trade on almost a daily basis.
Supreme Court rules Christian cross on government land does not violate separation of church and state
Math explains why the Democrats may have trouble picking a candidate
With 24 declared candidates for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination (and counting), many Americans are likely wondering how the party will ultimately make up its mind and settle on the best candidate.
As mathematicians, we wondered whether there might not even be a best candidate. In fact, this is an established mathematical paradox. The more candidates there are, the greater the chance there is no clear favorite.