A former prosecutor said George Papadopoulos would be a fool to blow up his plea agreement with special counsel Robert Mueller.
The former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign agreed to cooperate with investigators after pleading guilty to lying to FBI agents, and Mueller recommended last week that he serve up to six months in prison.
However, his wife Simona Papadopoulos said he would decide Tuesday whether to withdraw from the plea deal, and he has posted cryptic tweets suggesting that he would reconsider his cooperation.
Been a hell of a year. Decisions.
— George Papadopoulos (@GeorgePapa19) August 20, 2018
“The whole point of a guilty plea, the judge will say over and over, do you understand what you’re doing?” former prosecutor Elie Honig told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”
The former state and federal prosecutor said Papadopoulos needs Mueller more than the special counsel needs him.
“Even if he succeeds in withdrawing his plea, it is a suicide mission,” Honig said. “He has nowhere to go. He is going to trial, and all indications are he would just get destroyed at trial. I don’t think Mueller is sweating this one.”
Barbara McQuade, former U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, said Papadopoulos faced significant legal jeopardy if he withdraws from his agreement.
“He could face potentially up to five years in prison, and I think if the deal is ripped up he could revert to the original charges that were out there against him in the complaint, which included obstruction of justice, which has a 15-year cap,” McQuade said. “So I think his exposure would actually be higher.”
She said a cryptic “tick-tock” tweet Papadopoulos posted Saturday could be aimed at President Donald Trump, and not Mueller.
“I think the ‘tick-tock’ could mean something else,” McQuade said. “I think it could mean, look out, Trump people, ‘I have more to give, I want a better deal than the six months.'”
Mueller complained that Papadopoulos’ lies allowed London-based professor Joseph Mifsud to leave the country before investigators could properly question him in the probe.
“In light of what he’s done so far, the repeated lying to the FBI and to Mueller’s team, that they’re just not interested in doing business,” McQuade said.
She said the original plea agreement differed significantly from deals reached with former national security adviser Michael Flynn and former deputy campaign chairman Rick Gates, who both agreed to cooperate with Mueller.
“It lacks a paragraph in there about cooperation, that we agree that you’re going to continue to cooperate, we might call you to testify, and in exchange we are going to file a motion with the judge under section 5K of the sentencing guidelines to ask for a reduction in your sentence,” McQuade said.
“That paragraph is not included in George Papadopoulos’ plea agreement, and I think that’s because he is a failed cooperator,” she added. “They went down that road and they thought, you are just a liar who is never going to tell us what is what. Maybe he has changed his mind, but I think for Mueller’s people it is too late. Once they filed that sentencing memo they said, we’ve made our final decision.”
Trump-loving GOP candidate faces more trouble as his Ukraine ranting provokes a defamation suit
A pro-Trump aspiring politician who was named in documents released by an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani is being sued by a Dutch Trump supporter for defamation, the Hartford Courant reports.
Robert F. Hyde reportedly made the alleged defamatory comments during an interview with a local news station, where he discussed the documents alleging he was involved in some sort of surveillance operation of Marie Yovanovitch, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. WhatsApp messages appeared to show that Hyde was sending updates on Yovanovitch's whereabouts to Lev Parnas, a former associate of Giuliani who is now under indictment for campaign finance violations.
BUSTED: These 10 GOP senators said Ukraine quid pro quo was a red line before Bolton bombshell
The Washington Post's Philip Bump has tracked down statements from ten different Republican senators who in the past indicated that impeachment charges against President Donald Trump would be far more serious if it could be proven there was a quid-pro-quo agreement that involved exchanging the release of foreign aid to Ukraine for the investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden.
All of the statements flagged by Bump came before this week's bombshell revelation that former national security adviser John Bolton's upcoming book will reportedly say the president directly linked Ukraine aid to the Biden investigation.
Law professor slams Trump team’s ‘distortions of facts’ as they try to shoot down congressional subpoenas
Writing for The Atlantic, University of Missouri Law professor Frank Bowman excoriated the White House legal team for their rationale against honoring congressional subpoenas in the impeachment inquiry.
"On Saturday, Trump’s lawyer Pat Philbin tried to extinguish any flickers of enlightened self-interest among Republicans by arguing that Trump was entitled to stonewall the House because the House hadn’t properly authorized its own subpoenas," wrote Bowman. "Like so many contentions of the president’s defenders, this is malarkey thinly draped with plausible-sounding distortions of facts, rules, court opinions, and the Constitution itself."