Quantcast
Connect with us

‘Cruelty for cruelty’s sake’: Columnist destroys Trump’s ‘schoolyard bully’ style of governing

Published

on

In an unsparing column in the Washington Post, journalist Eugene Robinson accused President Donald Trump of being a self-centered bully whose governing philosophy can be condensed down to “cruelty for cruelty’s sake.”

According to the Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, Trump has no qualms about ripping immigrant children from the arms of their desperate parents or holding 800,000 federal workers hostage without paychecks — or working for free — in order to get funding for a wall that he believes will be his greatest achievement.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Imagine going a month without a paycheck. Imagine lining up the bills and deciding which get paid and which don’t — mortgage or rent, electricity, heating. Imagine having to commute to work at an ‘essential’ government job and trying to scrape together enough money for gas or bus fare<” Robinson proposed. “All of these hardships, and many more, are being inflicted on hardworking public servants for no earthly reason.”

“From the beginning, Democrats have taken a reasonable position: Keep the government open, and let’s have a debate and a negotiation about border security. Trump agreed — until far-right pundits accused him of abandoning his border wall, which everyone knows will never be built,” he explained, before pointing out new revelations that the Trump administration’s “sadistic policy of separating would-be immigrants from their children has been far more extensive, and more shocking, than anyone suspected.”

Robinson then launched a full-out assault on Trump.

“Trump cruelly gives the cold shoulder to those around the world who advocate respect for human rights. Perhaps Trump thinks this is how his base wants him to act. Perhaps his own myriad insecurities lead him to falsely equate callous indifference with strength,” he accused. “Such gratuitous cruelty is really this administration’s only consistent policy. Trump tried his best, for example, to destroy the Affordable Care Act, not because he had a better idea about how to provide health care but apparently because he can’t abide anything with President Barack Obama’s name on it.”

“Why would Trump injure innocent consumers? Why hurt stockholders of companies led by chief executives he does not like? Why seek to deny desperately needed help to Puerto Rico, where some politicians have been critical of Trump?” Robinson asked rhetorically. “Why? Because he can.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Like all schoolyard tyrants, he tries to project great strength to mask internal weakness,” he summed up before concluding, “But remember the one universal truth about bullies: The bigger they are, the harder they fall.”

You can read the whole thing here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Twitter baffled at Trump’s tirade over Roger Stone’s sentencing

Published

on

Roger Stone, a longtime confidant of Donald Trump, is facing sentencing this Thursday in a Washington federal court after being convicted in November of lying to Congress and witness tampering. In a Twitter rant this morning, Trump lamented Stone's predicament, saying he's being unfairly targeted while figures like James Comey and Hillary Clinton have escaped justice.

"'They say Roger Stone lied to Congress,'" Trump tweeted while sending a shot at his least favorite network, CNN. "I see, but so did Comey (and he also leaked classified information, for which almost everyone, other than Crooked Hillary Clinton, goes to jail for a long time), and so did Andy McCabe, who also lied to the FBI! FAIRNESS?"

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Righteous prosecution’: DOJ lawyers ignore Barr’s new guidelines and recommend jail time for Stone

Published

on

Four prosecutors in the Roger Stone case resigned when the Justice Department took over the sentencing of Stone and rewrote their memo.

Now, however, the DOJ is still arguing that Roger Stone belongs in jail.

It's a strange turn as the new prosecutor in the case essentially ignored the change in sentencing memos, despite Judge Amy Berman Jackson grilling him about the change.

https://twitter.com/MMineiro_CNS/status/1230525891815596033

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Legal experts shocked as DOJ lawyers rebel against Bill Barr’s new Roger Stone sentencing guidelines

Published

on

The new prosecutors in the Roger Stone case still seem to be ignoring the re-write of the sentencing memo, according to those watching the trial unfold.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson told the courtroom Thursday that she reviewed government sentencing recommendations from both the prosecutors who resigned last week and the supervisor who rewrote the memo.

"I note that the initial memo has not been withdrawn," she said.

"There was nothing in bad faith with the initial prosecution team’s recommendation," said Crabb.

"It’s not about bad faith. It was fully consistent with current DOJ policy, wasn’t that true?" Berman Jackson asked.

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image