Quantcast
Connect with us

Paul Krugman shreds Trump for claiming ‘war on poverty is over’ as more Americans struggle to survive

Published

on

]New York Times columnist Paul Krugman went on a tweetstorm Saturday morning about an easily-overlooked economic report the Trump White House released earlier in the week.

Krugman pointed out that “with everything else” going on in Trumpworld — a reference to the newly-submitted report by special counsel Robert Mueller on Russian collusion — many may have missed the Economic Report from the President that included apparent joke references to “interns” like Jabba the Hutt and Spider-Man.

The report “says that we basically have no policy in America,” Krugman wrote, noting that a few years prior, former House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) issued his own report “claiming that the War on Poverty should be [canceled] because it completely failed to reduce poverty.”

Donald Trump’s administration, the columnist wrote, now says the “War on Poverty” should be canceled because it was won by America.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Let’s focus on the absurdity and cruelty of the no-poverty claim,” Krugman mused, writing that the US Census found that 5.7 percent of the American population lives on less than half the total annual income of the official poverty line.

“For a single parent with two children, the poverty threshold is $19,749,” he noted. “So the White House is basically saying that a single mother with 2 kids and an income of $10K, that is, half the poverty line is … not poor.”

“Does anyone who has ever stepped outside a gated suburban community believe that?” the columnist wondered.

ADVERTISEMENT

Krugman noted nine percent of Americans are still uninsured and questioned the government’s numbers.

“Do you really believe that the number of poor people is only a quarter as large as the number of uninsured?” he wrote.

“I know that complete lack of empathy or understanding of other people’s hardship is basically a required qualification to serve in the Trump admin,” Krugman concluded. “Still, this really beggars belief.”

ADVERTISEMENT

You can read the rest of the thread below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

FLASHBACK: Jeffrey Epstein accuser revealed there are tapes of famous men with underage girls

Published

on

A 2015 report is resurfacing on Raw Story as the Jeffrey Epstein trial begins and Washington and New York men fear being outed.

It appears that a series of QAnon Facebook groups and pro-Trump groups were the ones responsible for posting the story.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Fox News is so obsessed with Ocasio-Cortez they said her name three times as much as CNN or MSNBC

Published

on

It's clear that Fox News and other right-wing reporters are trying to create boogymen in Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. A new analysis by CNN media reporter Brian Stelter, revealed that the conservative network has said Ocasio-Cortez's name more than CNN and MSNBC combined.

"First, Ocasio-Cortez and her "Squad" mate Ilhan Omar have been talked about a lot more on Fox than on other cable news channels this year," Stelter wrote. "Second, the freshmen have been getting more attention on cable than seasoned leaders of the Democratic Party."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Congress should ask Mueller these specific questions about Trump’s involvement with Russia: Conservative columnist

Published

on

Conservative Never-Trump columnist Jennifer Rubin outlined the essential questions that Democrats should ask special counsel Robert Mueller in an op-ed for the Washington Post.

"Rather than engage in the normal scattershot questioning punctuated by speechifying, the House Judiciary Committee should assign its able attorney Norman Eisen to conduct the questioning," proposed Rubin. "Members could then follow up with additional questions.'

One question she proposed asking: "Mr. Mueller, the attorney general said you did not find 'collusion.' However, you did not look for collusion. Please explain what you looked for and how that differs from [Attorney General William] Barr’s assertion that you essentially cleared President Trump of collusion?"

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image