Quantcast
Connect with us

Secretary of State desperately tries to separate the White House from Iranian group Bolton and Giuliani advocated

Published

on

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani on Fox News (screengrab)

While President Donald Trump’s lawyer and National Security Advisor are speaking to a controversial Iranian resistance group in Iran, the State Department is trying desperately to separate itself.

According to Axios, Secretary Mike Pompeo met with around 15 Iranian-American community leaders in a Renaissance Dallas Hotel. He spent most of the time listening and answering questions for those fearful Trump could bomb Iran out of the blue.

ADVERTISEMENT

He confirmed the president is “not going to do a military exercise inside Iran.”

“If regime change does not occur internally what is the endgame?” one person asked, according to sources in the meeting.

“We’re careful not to use the language of regime change,” Pompeo replied. He repeated that Trump would never intervene militarily in the country.

“Has the idea of a coup been considered?” Another participant asked Pompeo.

“Even if we did, would I be telling you guys about it?” he joked.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pompeo complained about the green uprising in 2009, saying the Trump administration would have handled it differently, though he didn’t clarify how.

When probed about Giuliani and Bolton’s speeches to the controversial group, he said it was different because it isn’t the president himself.

“Let’s not beat around the bush,” Pompeo said. “Ambassador Bolton spoke at an MEK rally. President Trump and I have not.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The source explained Pompeo “acknowledged that John Bolton and Rudy Giuliani had connections or ties, whatever you want to call it … with the MEK, but he did say that he and the president did not.”

Read the full piece at Axios.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump’s efforts to undo the election are facing resistance from these Republicans in key battleground states

Published

on

Critics of President Donald Trump — from liberals and progressives to right-wing Never Trump conservatives — are slamming Republicans in Congress who refuse to publicly acknowledge Joe Biden as president-elect or speak out against Trump's election-related lawsuits. But New York Times reporters Peter Baker and Kathleen Gray, in an article published on November 28, emphasize that in key battleground states, some of the people who have refused to indulge Team Trump's legal challenges and bogus election fraud claims are Republicans.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump’s team files fifth demand for Georgia to audit their ballot signatures as their campaign to overturn the election fizzles

Published

on

President Donald Trump's campaign has filed its fifth demand for the state of Georgia to audit the signatures on ballots.

The statement from the Trump team said that the "Georgia secretary of state should perform an immediate audit of the signatures on all absentee ballot applications and absentee ballot envelopes received for the Nov. 3 General Election. The Trump Campaign estimates that between 38,250 and 45,626 illegal votes from absentee ballots alone were cast in the state of Georgia -- far beyond the Biden-Harris ticket's current margin of 12,670 votes."

https://twitter.com/JulesJester/status/1333460202948075526

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Supreme Court hearing gets awkward as conservative Alito runs roughshod over chief justice Roberts

Published

on

President Trump is pressing the U.S. Supreme Court to allow him to exclude undocumented immigrants from the census count -- a move that goes against more than 200 years of practice where non-citizen residents, even those in the U.S. illegally, were among those counted.

While questioning New York Solicitor General Barbara Underwood, conservative Justice Samuel Alito said that the prospect of submitting two documents, one detailing census numbers of every person inside the U.S. and another detailing numbers that exclude undocumented immigrants inside the U.S. "seems like a totally meaningless formality."

Continue Reading