Quantcast
Connect with us

Is this Ukraine 2.0? Trump’s OMB holds up congress-approved military assistance

Published

on

- Commentary
Thanks for your support!
This article was paid for by reader donations to Raw Story Investigates.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

Dana Kennedy
Dana Kennedy

Congress approved more than $100 million in U.S. military aid to Lebanon in September but the Trump administration won’t even tell Beirut the check is in the mail.

For reasons no one fully understands–yet–Trump is holding up payment in a move reminiscent of the delay in military aid to Ukraine which led to something going on in Washington, D.C., this month called an impeachment inquiry.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ominously, the refusal (so far) to release the money to Lebanon could allow Russia, with its growing military influence in Syria, a way into Lebanon. Russia’s power in the area has intensified since Trump pulled U.S. troops out of northeastern Syria last month.

The U.S. military aid will reportedly pay for American-made military equipment for the Lebanese army.

The stonewalling is happening when Lebanon is enmeshed in its worst crisis since its bloody 1975-1990 civil war. Violent street protests have been going on since Oct. 17 over what many Lebanese see as a corrupt and incapable government. The U.S. military aid will reportedly pay for 88 American-made military equipment for the Lebanese army.

“The country is like a ship that is sinking little by little,” Nabih Berri, speaker of the Parliament said last week, according to Al Jazeera. “If we don’t take the necessary steps, it will sink entirely.”

Buried in Impeachment Testimony

The aid holdup was first reported by Reuters last month. The Associated Press discovered more about the mystery involving Trump’s apparent refusal to pony up the money to Lebanon when reading testimony from David Hale, the No. 3 official in the State Department in a transcript of the closed-door impeachment hearing that came out this week.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hale said that diplomats were increasingly concerned both that Trump was not releasing the aid nor giving an explanation for the hold-up.

“People started asking, ‘What’s the problem,” Hale testified, according to the AP.

In official lingo, the funds for Lebanon have been apportioned, which means they’ve been appropriated by Congress and scheduled for release by the administration but remain in a purgatory.

ADVERTISEMENT

The AP said five officials “familiar with the matter” said there’s no indication Trump is seeking any favors from the Lebanese government in releasing the funds to Lebanon, as he is being investigated for doing in Ukraine.

Hezbollah Missile Factory

A hint as to the back story behind the delay surfaced in late October when Israeli reporter Barak Ravid said Israel asked the United States to make the shutdown of a Hezbollah missile factory a condition of giving the country military aid. The United States has designated Hezbollah as a foreign terrorist organization.

ADVERTISEMENT

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warned the Lebanese government during his visit to Beirut last spring that Iran and Hezbollah might have built a new covert factory for precision missiles on Lebanese soil. His intelligence came from Israel.

To confuse things more, Trump on Thursday told Lebanese President Michel Aoun in a cable that the United States supported the new Lebanese government and wanted to work with it, Reuters reported.

Though the Pentagon, State Department and National Security Council all support the military aid to Lebanon, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has yet to sign off on it and won’t explain why. The department was similarly silent about the delay in releasing funds to Ukraine.

ADVERTISEMENT

The AP said that National Security Council staff “had deliberately tried to run an end-around of the Pentagon and State Department” by asking for a signed presidential determination to release the aid and then slow walking receipt of the finding to Trump.

“It’s beyond the pale,” said one official, according to the AP. “This is people at the NSC and OMB trying to insert their own personal ideologies into something that most everyone else supports as a national security interest.”

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Why do we need camo in space’: Trump’s Space Force ridiculed for woodland camouflage uniforms

Published

on

On Friday, the United States Space Force released an image of their new uniforms on Twitter.

The image shows a Battle Dress Uniform (BDU) for a four-star general in a woodland camouflage pattern, with a matching camo nametape.

https://twitter.com/SpaceForceDoD/status/1218335200964464650

However, many people were confused as to why the Space Force would use uniforms designed to blend in on earth.

Here's some of what people were saying:

https://twitter.com/PostCultRev/status/1218351691021484032

Sorry for the question but why do we need camo in space?

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

BUSTED: National Archives caught doctoring exhibit to remove criticism of President Trump from women

Published

on

The National Archives were caught editing an artifact from the Trump administration to remove criticism of the president, according to a bombshell new report in The Washington Post.

The newspaper reported on a "large color photograph" at the National Archives exhibit marking the centennial of women's suffrage.

"The 49-by-69-inch photograph is a powerful display. Viewed from one perspective, it shows the 2017 march. Viewed from another angle, it shifts to show a 1913 black-and-white image of a women’s suffrage march also on Pennsylvania Avenue. The display links momentous demonstrations for women’s rights more than a century apart on the same stretch of pavement. But a closer look reveals a different story," the newspaper noted.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Dershowitz is running a ‘bizarro defense’ of Trump: Harvard Law colleague says ‘Alan is just completely wacko’

Published

on

Two of the most famous names associated with Harvard Law School had competing appearances on MSNBC on Friday.

It began when Alan Dershowitz, a professor emeritus, was interviewed MSNBC chief legal correspondent Ari Melber about his new role officially representing President Donald Trump during the Senate impeachment trial.

Dershowitz claimed that neither abuse of power nor obstruction of Congress count as "high crimes" under the constitution.

Professor Alan Dershowitz, who has also been associated with Harvard Law for five decades, was asked about Dershowitz's argument during an interview with Chris Hayes.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image