Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump tries bribing the jury — and no Republican seems bothered by it

Published

on

- Commentary
Thanks for your support!
This article was paid for by reader donations to Raw Story Investigates.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

Terry H. Schwadron
Terry H. Schwadron

Last week, as the House moved closer to impeaching Donald Trump, the almost more disturbing note was that Trump is working to buy Senate support with campaign cash.

According to Politico, Trump is tapping his vast fund-raising network for a handful of loyal senators facing tough reelection bids in 2020.

Each of them has signed onto a Republican-backed resolution condemning the inquiry as “unprecedented and undemocratic.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Conspicuously absent from the group is Maine Sen.Susan Collins, a politically vulnerable Republican who’s refused to support the resolution and avoided taking a stance on impeachment.

In any world I understand, paying cash to would-be jurors in a pending trial would be called jury tampering and is against the law.

With his new push, Trump is exerting leverage over a group he badly needs in his corner with an impeachment trial likely coming soon to the Senate—but that also needs him,” said Politico.

In any world I understand, paying cash to would-be jurors in a pending trial would be called jury tampering and is against the law.

Nothing Trump Does Is Unlawful

But in the Senate Republican bubble where almost nothing that this president does is considered unlawful, we probably will have to put these actions to the ever-growing list of things-that-should-be-Trump-impeachment counts.

ADVERTISEMENT

This week, as a partisan divided House was preparing to vote to move the impeachment proceedings to its public hearings phase, the Trump reelection campaign sent a fundraising appeal to its massive email list urging donors to provide a contribution that would be divided between the president and Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner, Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst, and North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis.

Each of the senators is supporting the anti-impeachment resolution despite being endangered in 2020.

“If we don’t post strong fundraising numbers,” the message warned, “we won’t be able to defend the President from this baseless Impeachment WITCH HUNT.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Of course, the opposite need not be stated.

Take a stand against Trump and stand by for a political fusillade from Trump loyalists and the campaign itself.

ADVERTISEMENT

Politics, not Law

All of this underscores that the impeachment efforts are being seen first, continuing and at last as a partisan political battle, not a question of whether the president’s actions in seeking to pressure Ukraine’s leader into seeking dirt on Democrat Joe Biden in return for lethal military aid, as had already been voted by Congress.

If you consider this a set of political skirmishes rather than a Constitutional question, every supporting action on either side could be seen as an expression of politics, not law or American values.

That is why Republican supporters of the president in Congress have resorted to attacks on “process” without trying to defend the substance of the issues at hand, and why Trump feels totally within his rights to seek campaign influence over his Republican tribe in public debasement, twisting arms, or, seemingly trying to bribe individuals.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the end, of course, any impeachment trial would require that 20 Republicans join in a finding of guilt with the full cadre of Democrats in the Senate.

The political chances of that happening are slim to none, even as the legal case, the moral case, the abuse case against Trump is building.

We continue to hear from the nonpartisan military, security and intelligence figures within the White House – including military officers on the damning July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian leader – that dispute Trump’s account of the call.

Moreover, the continuing testimony, which is about to spill into open, televised sessions, shows that the White House campaign to dispatch attorney Rudy Giuliani outside the bounds of diplomatic protocols, outside Congressional review, shows that the effort was far more than a single phone call.

ADVERTISEMENT

Attacking the Investigation

It was a months-long effort to turn diplomacy to the personal, partisan advantage of Donald Trump.
The Republican defenses for Trump have attacked the investigation by Democrats as procedurally too secret, “a Soviet-style” inquisition, as Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), the House minority whip said.

Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has said only that even if true, the president’s behavior does not merit impeachment, indeed asserting that nothing bad or unusual has happened at all.

If Republicans don’t want to accept that basic violation as impeachment-worthy, it is difficult to imagine what exactly does qualify—unless it was a Democratic president in office, of course.

If Trump had a strong case here, why in the world would he need to offer cash to persuade senators even in his own party to stand with him? If Trump is interfering with his eventual jurors, why should that not prove an impeachment count on its own?

ADVERTISEMENT

 

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

He ‘can’t understand why he is being impeached’: CNN reports Trump is asking ’why are they doing his to me?’

Published

on

President Donald Trump is reportedly "distracted" by impeachment while vacationing at Mar-a-Lago as the United States Senate trial begins.

"A source close to the White House who speaks to Donald Trump regularly said the President has appeared 'distracted' by the impeachment trial that begins on Tuesday, telling people around him Friday night at Mar-a-Lago that he 'can't understand why he is impeached,'" CNN's Jim Acosta reported Saturday. "'Why are they doing this to me,' the source quoted Trump as saying repeatedly."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Rod Rosenstein’s legal defense in lawsuits from Strzok and Page won’t hold up under oath: legal experts

Published

on

Rod Rosenstein

Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein claimed responsibility for the release of text messages between then-FBI attorney Lisa Page and then-FBI official Peter Strzok.

Emails released in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) revealed the highly unusual release by Sarah Isgur Flores, who at the time was the spokesperson for Trump's Department of Justice (she is now overseeing CNN's 2020 election coverage).

Flores instructed reporters to not cite the release of the documents to the Depart of Justice.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Neo-Nazi arrested by FBI in terror plot before his comrades tried to kill him for being ‘stupid’ and ‘incompetent’: report

Published

on

On Saturday, CBC News reported that several members of a white supremacist group called The Base have been arrested in Georgia and Wisconsin. This comes one day after another set of raids in Maryland and Delaware that caught Patrik Mathews, a former reservist from Manitoba who crossed into the United States illegally and has been missing for five months after being accused of recruiting for the extremist group.

One new key detail came out about Mathews in an affidavit used to secure the arrest warrants for Mathews' alleged compatriots, according to the CBC: "Although the document suggests the group member believed to be Mathews stayed with a Georgia cell member for months, he is later reportedly characterized as 'incompetent' and 'stupid' and is seen as a liability to the local group. In fact, he eventually becomes a new potential murder target."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image