Quantcast
Connect with us

How Bill Barr will try to destroy his own DOJ report blowing up Trump’s ‘Deep State’ conspiracy theory

Published

on

In a column for the Daily Beast, longtime political observer Michael Tomasky warns that Attorney General Bill Barr will continue to act as Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and will undercut Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report that is expected to show no “Deep State” conspiracy against the president.

Calling Barr a “menace to society,” Tomasky said that the attorney general and other Trump supporters will use a three-prong strategy to destroy the report while at the same time cherry-picking anything they can find in it that supports the president.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Assuming the leaks are accurate and the report is not going to drop any nuclear bombs on the deep state, it’ll be the second reality-based setback for the president and his lickspittles after last week’s reports that John Durham, the prosecutor Bill Barr sent traipsing around the world to find evidence of an anti-Trump conspiracy, is turning up goose eggs,” Tomasky wrote. 

The columnist then suggested what Barr will do after the report is released.

“They’ll dump on Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Well-known deep-stater, etc etc,” Tomasky predicted. “Don’t buy it. Last week, the Center for American Progress put out an eye-opening report about Horowitz. Turns out that during the Obama administration, Horowitz issued two reports on Fast & Furious, the ‘scandal’ that was supposed to lead to Obummer’s impeachment, while during the Trump years Horowitz has not launched a single investigation into any allegations of corruption within the Department of Justice.”

More immediately, supporters of the president will grab on to any tidbit they can find to support their anti-White House conspiracy theories and will run with that to Trump-friendly conservative media to amplify it.

“They’ll try to characterize the findings as bombshells anyway,” Tomasky suggests. “I obviously don’t know as I write what the findings will be, but it sounds as if they’re likely to be violations of procedure of the type that probably happen a lot of the time, because we live in an imperfect world where investigations are conducted by imperfect people with imperfect information making the best judgments they can. People can make mistakes and still not be guilty of advancing a conspiracy against the president.”

ADVERTISEMENT

More importantly, and using a well-known Donald Trump tactic, the columnist predicts flat-out lying about the Horowitz report.

“They’ll just lie. They’ll dismiss the report as propaganda and keep on saying the same things they’ve been saying. Trump will certainly do that. And as long as he does it, his apologists will do it too,” he wrote.

With that, Tomasky stated that Democrats have their work cut out for them and suggested a new line of counterattack — specifically aimed at Barr.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This man is a clear and present danger. Even worse, in a way, than Trump himself, because Barr has daily decision-making power over how what forms of “justice” will be pursued in this country,” he wrote. “I’ve written, as have others, that every sign is that Barr is going to use the Justice Department to launch show trials next year against people like Peter Strzok and more generally use the department to re-elect Trump. Why wouldn’t he? When you believe godless Democrats are hellbent on destroying the country, everything is permitted to re-elect Trump.”

“Democrats have to stop this man. When the House Judiciary Committee finishes with Trump, it better turn its attention to Barr. If he succeeds, we’re cooked,” he concluded. 

ADVERTISEMENT

You can read more here (subscription required).


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump’s own impeachment witness says impeachable acts don’t need to be crimes in stunning rebuke

Published

on

When the House Judiciary Committee debated impeachment, only one of the four law professors called as expert witnesses sided with President Donald Trump: George Washington University Law professor Jonathan Turley, a noted civil libertarian, who argued that the House's process for gathering and debating evidence was problematic.

But in an op-ed for the Washington Post on Tuesday, Turley pointedly broke with Trump's legal team on one of their most fundamental arguments in the Senate trial: that the articles of impeachment are invalid because they do not allege the president committed a specific federal crime. Such a view, Turley wrote, "is at odds with history and the purpose of the Constitution."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Shame on them forever’: Law professor says ‘every single Republican in the Senate has failed us’

Published

on

Senate Republicans will be haunted by their party-line vote against witnesses and documents after opening arguments in President Donald Trump's impeachment trial, according to one legal expert closely following the proceedings.

Vermont Law School Prof. Jennifer Taub was more than 100 tweets into her coverage of the Senate trial when, on a party-line vote, the U.S. Senate voted 53 - 47 against an amendment by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) to obtain documents and witnesses.

"Disgusted. I am disgusted," Taub posted on Twitter.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

It’s ‘near-certain’ Saudi crown prince hacked Jared Kushner’s phone and ‘had secret access’ for years: reporter

Published

on

The House of Saud crown prince was implicated in the hacking of Washington Post owner and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos's cell phone in a bombshell new report in The Guardian.

"The Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos had his mobile phone “hacked” in 2018 after receiving a WhatsApp message that had apparently been sent from the personal account of the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, sources have told the Guardian. The encrypted message from the number used by Mohammed bin Salman is believed to have included a malicious file that infiltrated the phone of the world’s richest man, according to the results of a digital forensic analysis," The Guardian reported.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image