Quantcast
Connect with us

It’s time for an intervention with the dangerously sociopathic president: noted psychiatrist

Published

on

- Commentary
Thanks for your support!
This article was paid for by reader donations to Raw Story Investigates.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

If Donald Trump were not president, he would have been held and evaluated long ago.  Mental health professionals have deemed this a “no brainer” since early 2017.  Dangerousness is more about the situation than the person, and we ask questions such as whether the environment, including others, can constrain the person and whether one has access to weapons.

ADVERTISEMENT

The concerns expressed at an ethics conference at Yale and in the public-service book, The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump, unfolded over the past two years with exactitude: incitements to violence, cruel policies against children that lay the groundwork for future violence, and the fostering of a culture of violence both domestically and abroad.

With the impeachment hearings, Trump’s behavior has grown even more erratic … his psychological structure makes him especially prone to violent revenge in the face of humiliation.

With the announcement of an impeachment inquiry, we warned of our entering “a very dangerous state” and the need to handle the situation adeptly from a psychological point of view.  We wrote an urgent letter to Congress members gathering 250 signatures.  Three days later, without informing his advisors, the president unleashed Turkish forces on our allies and handed over advantage to our enemies.  These are predictable and therefore preventable events.

Disconnected from Reality

With the impeachment hearings, the president’s behavior has grown even more erratic with frantic tweetingrallies that are increasingly disconnected from reality, and a very disturbing letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.  Because of his apparent cowardice and his predatory keenness in sensing the public’s desire for peace, it may be difficult to picture him as a violent man, but his psychological structure makes him especially prone to violent revenge in the face of humiliation.

Warning against danger and alerting about the need for an evaluation, to protect public health, is not diagnosing, and hence keeping with ethical guidelines, and thousands of mental health professionals agree.  We recently submitted a petition signed by more than 800 mental health professionals for the House Judiciary Committee to consider psychological aspects.  But in case Congress continues to find it difficult to consult with us, I outline a few recommendations here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sociopathic Behavior

When an individual is dangerous with signs of sociopathic pathology, containment is the first step of correct management.  Postponing accountability and allowing the president to swell in his sense of power, before proceeding with impeachment, creates one of the most dangerous periods in his presidency.  Impeachment finally begins containment, but it should only be the first step.

The House speaker has done well to call out an invalid Senate trial and to delay until it is fair.  In psychological terms, it is a technique called “limit setting.”  When there are no other means of logistically limiting harmful actions, statements and deeds need to call out inappropriate behavior in ways that are commensurate with overall facts.  Investigations should be ongoing, and the reasons for bringing only two articles of impeachment laid out: a colluding Senate rather than a lack of high crimes.  While the president is likely to grow more dangerous whether he is acquitted or not (through grandiose belief in impunity or vengeful rage reaction), psychological limit setting is more effective than political strategy alone, since politics require grounding in reality to work.

Removal from His Position

When “shared psychosis” (contagion of delusions or other symptoms onto individuals who are not impaired) occurs, removal of the mentally compromised individual from close contact permits dramatic improvement. In clinical situations, the affected individuals return to normal sometimes within days.  If Donald Trump’s direct exposure to audiences through Twitter, his rallies, or his recent public letter cannot be curtailed, it needs to be properly inoculated (I demonstrate a method by analytically “translating” his letter).  Most effective, of course, would be removal from his position of influence.

ADVERTISEMENT

Similarly for war-making powers, psychological containment is paramount if actual limitation of his access were impossible.  South Korean President Moon Jae-in is said to have assembled a panel of mental health experts before he intervened between Donald Trump and North Korean Leader Kim Jong-un, dramatically reversing a spiraling course of verbal sparring into a dialogue for an extended period.  Our own CIA employs psychiatrists to perform psychological profiles on foreign leaders.  It would likewise be helpful to understand with greater nuance our own leader, especially when our safety depends on correct interpretation and management.

I and hundreds of mental health professionals are available and eager to assist with any or all these efforts.  When it comes to public safety, our interests as health professionals and the interests of politicians in charge of protecting the nation coincide.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr.  Bandy X.  Lee is a forensic psychiatrist at the Yale School of Medicine, president of the World Mental Health Coalition, and editor of  The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 37 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump defense team’s two most ‘egregious constitutional claims’ blown up by law professor: They ‘have impeachment exactly backwards’

Published

on

Writing for Just Security on Friday, Frank O. Bowman III, a legal expert and professor at the University of Missouri School of Law, detailed two of the “more egregious constitutional claims” put forth by Donald Trump’s impeachment defense team in a trial brief filed last week.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Stop lying’: Experts and observers discredit Trump attorney’s impeachment defense with readily available facts

Published

on

After three days of House impeachment managers’ brilliant prosecution of President Donald Trump – and “prebuttal” of the arguments the president’s team was expected to make – White House attorneys Saturday morning began their defense of President Trump.

It’s not going well.

Deputy White House Counsel Mike Purpura (photo) has been making the majority of today’s arguments – they have decided that not enough people will be watching on TV so Saturday’s defense will last not eight but just two hours.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Nancy Pelosi missed a big opportunity in impeachment — but she still has time to fix it

Published

on

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has her reasons for limiting her impeachment articles to offenses stemming from the abuses and violations related to Ukraine. Unfortunately, she declined to pursue a broader impeachment approach that recognizes multiple provable, serious violations of the Constitution. Speaker Pelosi overruled Chairs of Committees, including the Judiciary Committee, and other senior lawmakers who wanted to forward to the Senate a broader array of impeachable offenses.

Having lost four of the last five House elections to the worst Republican Party in history, Speaker Pelosi remains cautious. She is overly worried about the conservative Democrats who won congressional seats in 2018 in Republican, pro-Trump districts. Endangering their seats might, Pelosi fears, lead to the loss of the House in 2020 and, more immediately, risk not having the votes in the House to pass additional impeachable offenses.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image