Quantcast
Connect with us

McConnell is surely preparing a minefield of procedural moves to save Trump’s skin

Published

on

Thanks for your support!
This article was paid for by reader donations to Raw Story Investigates.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

Terry H. Schwadron
Terry H. Schwadron

The impeachment trial shouldn’t come down to which tricks and maneuvers work best – for any side.

For perhaps one day, senators ought to be able to set aside the proscribed role as defenders of their partisan parties to consider whether Donald Trump’s repeatedly brusque treatment of the Constitution is beyond the pale set for impeachment.

But, of course, we know ahead of time that they cannot, and thus, we are about to be dragged once again through procedures that will be more for show than for results.

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, one could hope that it is out of the conviction that facts will be sought and that American voters can be assured that there has been an actual review.

The Republican-dominant Senate is already assured of the impeachment trial outcome, just as Democrats in the House appeared sure that the impeachment charge would be voted.

At this moment, as we prepare for the start of whatever will pass as impeachment procedures, that is not the case. Instead, we have high-stakes political gamesmanship, we have people trying to pull legal tricks out of their MAGA hats, and we have the bullying sureness that comes from having a majority of votes.

In short, the Republican-dominant Senate is already assured of the impeachment trial outcome, just as Democrats in the House appeared sure that the impeachment charge would be voted.

Now that Speaker Nancy Pelosi has sent the actual impeachment charges to the Senate and named her seven prosecutor-managers, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is signaling that he will mimic procedures followed when Bill Clinton was impeached, with a close relationship with White House druthers and with a majority-protected assurance that Trump will be cleared.

ADVERTISEMENT

Witnesses or not, new evidence or not, the decision is all-but-in before the trial begins within the week. Even if Trump committed bad deeds. Even if Trump obstructed Congress. Even if the President’s ever-changing remarks show he is a little off his rocker.

Maneuvering to Dismiss

Still, various senators, lawyers, pundits and friends are flourishing a set of tricks that can be used to undercut or dismiss the charges altogether.

Trump himself, who had championed a full trial that would call witnesses of his choosing, including Joe Biden and son, Hunter Biden, and the whistleblower whose complaint launched the review of Ukrainian quid-pro-quo case, now says the Senate should just dismiss the whole thing. Holding a trial, he says, would merely give credence to the House procedures in voting the charges.

ADVERTISEMENT

That view, of course, reflects one of the two impeachable offenses here – the disdain for Congress as a legitimate and Constitutionally directed equal partner in decision-making.

Bolstering Trump’s call have been televised appearances by Rudy Giuliani, who said the proceedings reflect charges that are “fabricated,” and that the Supreme Court should summarily have the impeachment “declared unconstitutional.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Even his television host, Jeanine Pirro was confused. Giuliani said the rules are “set by the Senate then the chief justice interprets the rules. The chief justice will be given the power to dismiss.” But he acknowledged that “there’s nothing in the Constitution that would allow the Supreme Court” to do that.

Indeed, we have no idea what Chief Justice John G Roberts Jr. will do as the trial’s presiding officer, but it is a good bet that he won’t summarily wipe the charges away.

Supreme Court Intervention

Actually, in a column for the Washington Post, attorney James Robenalt laid out the legal basis for the Supreme Court to step in and review the impeachment trial of Donald Trump if there is evidence it was not conducted properly – but from the perspective opposite Giuliani. With McConnell readily admitting that he is working hand-in-hand with the White House to undercut the impeachment trial of the president — as well as signing as a co-sponsor a dismissal bill in the Senate that would allow all charges against Trump to be dismissed without a trial — Robenalt explains there is precedent for the Supreme Court to intervene to declare Senate proceedings unfair.

ADVERTISEMENT

In another op-ed, conservative attorney George Conway and law professor Neal Katyal argued that Pelosi should “split up” the articles of impeachment — submitting the article of obstruction of Congress, but holding onto the article of abuse of power for further investigation.

That “investigation” would be the calling of former National Security Advisor John R. Bolton, who has promised to testify, but whose appearance would launch yet another round of executive privilege arguments in the Senate – and in court.

Their argument, of course, is that although there is plenty of evidence demonstrating Trump’s guilt, his obstruction has prevented all of the evidence from coming to light.

Minefield of Moves

So, we’re surely walking into a minefield of procedural moves and cross-moves, all aimed to turn this proceeding about the appropriateness of keeping Trump in office into a strictly partisan political mess.

ADVERTISEMENT

Frankly, it is all extremely tiring and disappointing. It is difficult to be a citizen standing by to have to watch maneuvering rather than a dissection or debate, even, about whether the president’s behavior finally has been so bad as to put the nation at risk through misuse of office.

In the meantime, Trump and his family still have a full slate of court cases facing them — three of them to be heard by the Supreme Court.

As Bloomberg News ticked off, House committees are seeking his financial records, a New York prosecutor wants his income tax returns, and public officials and private watchdogs say he’s unlawfully profiting from foreign government business. The House Judiciary Committee is suing to get the records of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, and a court is being asked if former White House Counsel Don McGahn must testify.

A Long List of Abuses

Besides his policies that debase environment, civil rights, and separation of religion, Trump has abused emoluments clauses, campaign finance laws, nepotism and classified security.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Supreme Court plans to hear arguments by April on two lawsuits filed by Trump seeking to block House committees’ subpoenas for his financial records. A ruling is likely by the end of June.  And the Supreme Court also plans to hear arguments this spring on Manhattan Dist. Atty. Cyrus Vance Jr.’s subpoena for the president’s personal tax returns and business records. A ruling is due by the end of June. Vance subpoenaed the president’s financial records to investigate whether the Trump Organization falsified business records to cover up hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels and one-time Playboy playmate Karen McDougal before the 2016 election. The records are held by the Mazars accounting firm.

You might think the Senate could focus for a moment on two charges of wrong-doing without having to resort to procedural tricks or simple dismissal of any Constitutional challenge.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump’s face-saving coronavirus response shows he cares more about rallies than governing

Published

on

You wouldn’t think that disease, particularly a communicable disease like coronavirus, would have to be shoved through the partisan political machine that we are using for most issues these days. It’s not as if one side of the nation’s divide is in favor of more disease.

But the partisan tones are there, and to me, at least, that raises the fundamental issue about whether Team Trump even wants to govern, or just run political rallies.

Consider:

--Donald Trump and some of his key spokesmen, like economic adviser Larry Kudlow, is saying everything is under control, not to worry. Calling an evening public press conference to assure that the American government has a good handle on the spread of disease in this country, Trump said things are in such control that he is asking Vice President Mike Pence to coordinate the government’s response, and that Congress can do whatever it wants. Hmm, Czar Pence or even Dr. Pence; that’ll fix things. Actually, it feels as if the remarks about public health really are focused on Wall Street, which is overreacting through a plunge in stock values, and walk away from a public leadership role.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump bumbles into disaster as his coronavirus response turns out to be nothing but a gust of bluster

Published

on

The president spoke to the nation Wednesday about the spread of the coronavirus. It didn’t go well, just as it never goes well when Donald Trump must be presidential. It’s worth quoting Bloomberg Opinion’s Jonathan Bernstein at length. Today, he wrote:

He was at times barely coherent even for someone who knew what he was trying to say. I can’t imagine what it was like for the bulk of the nation, folks who only sometimes pay attention to politics but might have tuned in because they want to be reassured that the government is on top of the problem. He must have been almost completely incomprehensible to them, rambling on about how he had recently discovered that the flu can kill lots of people and referring in a totally oblique way to the budget requests he had made to Congress and their reaction. He occasionally said something that sort of made sense, but mostly? Not. Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel’s reaction was what I thought: “I found most of what he said incoherent.”

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

This basic data exposes Trump’s stupidity on the economy

Published

on

By multiple measures, workers are faring poorly under Donald Trump compared to his predecessor. Yet Trump keeps telling workers that because of him they are doing better. Let’s examine the facts.

The latest news shows that growth in the last three months of 2019 was at a modest pace of 2.1%. That’s a third of what candidate Trump promised (a ridiculous promise that many believed), it's lower than the 3.2% average growth of the last 73 years and its lower than during the second term of the Obama administration.

The rate of GDP growth has been slower each year that Trump has been in office, as we reported earlier and even earlier and still earlier when we gave Trump a grade of C.

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image