Quantcast
Connect with us

Mike Flynn’s lawyers ask US Appeals Court to force Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case

Published

on

Retired U.S. Army lieutenant general Michael Flynn, Sr. at a campaign rally for Donald Trump. Photo by Gage Skidmore.

According to a new court filing by Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s lawyers, the U.S. Appeals Court in Washington, D.C. should order Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss the case Flynn has already pleaded guilty to.

The Department of Justice decided that it would dismiss the case against Flynn saying that the lies Flynn told weren’t relevant to the case, which isn’t what the law says about lying to the FBI. Flynn has confessed twice to lying under oath, which is a crime.

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, Attorney General Bill Barr sought to dismiss the charges and demanded that the presiding judge in the case let it all go.

Judge Sullivan, however, refused, instead appointing an independent and retired judge to serve as a kind of DOJ proxy since the Justice Department has moved to the defense side. He is tasked with concluding whether Flynn should be held in criminal contempt.

According to the filing, Flynn’s lawyers want Judge Sullivan to “disregarded the constitutional imperative” of a federal judge by failing to grant Barr’s request and by appointing former Judge John Gleeson to serve as “amicus curiae.”

“Petitioner respectfully requests that this Court order the district court immediately to (1) grant the Justice Department’s Motion to Dismiss; (2) vacate its order appointing amicus curiae; and (3) reassign the case to another district judge as to any further proceedings,” Flynn’s lawyer wrote in the court filing.

“Binding Supreme Court and Circuit precedent squarely foreclose the district court’s determination to continue the prosecution of General Flynn,” the filing also says. “The district court order appointing an amicus is both unauthorized and bespeaks a disturbing lack of appreciation of the court’s limited role when confronted with a motion to dismiss by the Government in a criminal case.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Flynn’s lead attorney, Sidney Powell, also lambasted Judge Gleeson as an independent jurist because of a recent op-ed he wrote for the Washington Post about the Flynn case. According to Powell, the editorial “excoriat[ed] the Department of Justice’s Motion to Dismiss as ‘smack[ing] of impropriety,’ of attempting to make the court ‘a party to corruption,’ and of ‘reek[ing] of improper political influence.’”

Powell then claimed that the government hid evidence during Flynn’s prosecution. It’s an odd claim because the DOJ then argued that the lies were immaterial, so it would stand to reason that the so-called “evidence” that wasn’t included was also immaterial.

Thus far, 1,000 former federal prosecutors have signed onto a brief saying they believe the Flynn dismissal is a miscarriage of justice.

ADVERTISEMENT

You can read the full filing here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Rosh Hashanah services interrupted by death of the first Jewish woman on the Supreme Court

Published

on

The death of the first Jewish woman on the U.S. Supreme Court interrupted Rosh Hashanah services on Friday evening.

"On Friday, Jewish people around the country celebrating Rosh Hashanah were stunned to learn that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a prominent member of their own tribe, had died," the HuffPost reported. "People received alerts, Zoom messages and announcements from their rabbis about Ginsburg Friday night."

While many people were saddened by the passing of the iconic jurist, Twitter user Leora Horwitz noted a silver lining.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

‘Big mistake’: Trump’s favorite pollster tells Fox News why Republicans shouldn’t push nomination before the election

Published

on

Fox News on Friday examined why it would be a "big mistake" for Republicans to attempt to force through a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court.

Following Ginsburg's death, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) vowed that Trump's nominee would receive a vote, but did not specify whether it would occur before the election or during the "lame duck" session of Congress that occurs before the 2020 election victors are sworn in.

But conservative pollster Scott Rasmussen warned Republicans it would be a bad idea during an appearance with Fox News personality Laura Ingraham.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

LISTEN: Mourners sing ‘Amazing Grace’ outside the Supreme Court to celebrate Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Published

on

Heartwarming videos were shared on social media on Friday night showing the spontaneous gathering at the Supreme Court following the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The large crowd, with many people wearing masks, sang the hymn "Amazing Grace."

Here are some of the videos of the scene:

A moving moments as dozens join in to sing “Amazing Grace” on the steps of the Supreme Court. pic.twitter.com/NGZyZi4YR4

— Mike Balsamo (@MikeBalsamo1) September 19, 2020

Continue Reading