According to a report at the New York Times, aides to Donald Trump are privately conceding that the executive orders he signed with great fanfare at his Bedminster country club will have little impact on the economy even if they are enacted which seems tenuous at best.
Writing, “The executive actions President Trump took on Saturday were pitched as a unilateral jolt for an ailing economy. But there is only one group of workers that seems guaranteed to benefit from them, at least right away: lawyers”, the Times’ Jim Tankersley said the proposals to boost unemployment payments, halt evictions, give renters a break and ease up on payments for some student loan borrowers will not bring enough money into the economy to have much of an effect.
“Conservative groups have warned that suspending payroll tax collections is unlikely to translate into more money for workers. An executive action seeking to essentially create a new unemployment benefit out of thin air will almost certainly be challenged in court,” Tankersly revealed, “And as Mr. Trump’s own aides concede, the orders will not provide any aid to small businesses, state and local governments or low- and middle-income workers.”
The report goes on to note that cash-strapped states are already under water dealing with COVID-19-related expenses and Trump’s proposals will do nothing to help them and will likely hurt them as more lay-offs will ensue.
“Without more money from the federal government, states and local governments will almost certainly have to cut their budgets and lay off workers, increasing the ranks of the unemployed,” the report states.
Trump’s executive orders likely will not survive scrutiny, with one GOP lawmaker, Sen. Ben Sasse (NE) calling them “unconstitutional slop.”
You can read more here.
North Carolina man arrested after he’s discovered with guns, explosives in plot to assassinate Joe Biden
Fox News host interrupts Trump adviser for attacking Kristen Welker: ‘She’s a reporter, not an activist’
Fox News host Bill Hemmer on Thursday called out Trump campaign adviser Mercedes Schlapp after she labeled NBC correspondent Kristen Welker as an "activist."
Just hours before the final presidential debate of 2020, Hemmer asked Schlapp if President Donald Trump's strategy is to attack Welker, who is scheduled to moderate the event.
"We'll see what happens," Schlapp replied. "But we know about the moderator. She's a bit of an activist and we want a fair debate."
Hemmer interrupted: "Sorry, she's a reporter. She's not an activist."
"Well, she worked for NBC and she worked for MSNBC, which I would say is not necessarily fair and balanced," Schlapp replied.
‘Would be so wild if Harrison pulled this off!’: Democratic challenger pulls ahead of Lindsey Graham
As Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham came under fire Thursday morning for holding a contested vote to advance U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett to the full chamber, new polling showed Democratic challenger Jaime Harrison with a narrow lead over the South Carolina Republican.
Early mail-in and in-person voting is already underway in the Palmetto State for next month's general election, in which Graham is trying to keep a Senate seat he has held since 2003, after serving four terms in the House. The Morning Consult poll signals Harrison has a shot at ousting the GOP senator.