Quantcast
Connect with us

Mueller’s fear of Trump’s reaction to requesting his finances is another count of obstruction of justice: MSNBC panel

Published

on

Special counsel Bob Mueller (left) and President Donald Trump (right). Images via screengrab.

Top Justice Department aide Andrew Weissmann reported in his new book Where Law Ends that special counsel Robert Mueller didn’t go into President Donald Trump’s finances when he investigated whether or not his 2016 campaign coordinated with Russia to win.

It was part of a discussion on MSNBC Tuesday that also addressed the recent findings by the CIA that Russian President Vladimir Putin is behind efforts to bring down Joe Biden.

ADVERTISEMENT

There were many things that Mueller could have done to ultimately get to the bottom of Russian coordination had Mueller wanted to do it. Given the Department of Justice’s policy of not indicting the president, however, the investigation didn’t do things like subpoena Trump’s finances or subpoena him to appear and answer questions. Instead, Trump was given a kind of “take-home test,” where he could answer Mueller’s questions in writing and have his lawyers review it. Mueller has already revealed that Trump may have lied in that written Q&A despite it being under oath.

Weissmann’s book revealed that the main reason that Mueller didn’t want to look into Trump’s finances was that they feared how Trump would respond. They were so intimidated by him that it is something that could spell another count of obstruction of justice of the special counsel’s investigation, said New York Times correspondent Michael Schmidt.

“What it shows is the effectiveness of what the president did,” he explained.

NBC News’ Jeremy Bash, who previously served as the chief of staff at the Department of Defense and the CIA, explained that the new findings in the CIA release reveal another case of coordination with a foreign power to win an election.

Trump was asked about Putin’s attempt to poison political detractor Alexei Navalny but refused to say anything about it to the press.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Obviously, the ultimate accountability in our system is at the ballot and this has got to be an issue, I think, in the presidential capable,” said Bash. “It’s got — a light has to be shined on it to showcase exactly that not only did Trump welcome Russian interference, he’s refused to condemn it. He’s benefitted from it and he’s rewarded it. I think if we state that clearly and make that case, I think lay it out to the American people, they’re going to understand that if they re-elect the president, it’s going to be to Vladimir Putin’s benefit. It’s going to be the benefit of the Kremlin. If people want that, fine, but I think it harms American national security.”

Bash walked through a list of “rewards” that Trump has given Putin since becoming president: “He denigrated NATO, he invited the Russians into the G7, he slow-rolled military aid to the Ukrainians, he refused to condemn Russia’s attempt to kill an intelligence officer in the UK, a poison attack, an intelligence officer who, by the way, the United States helped win his freedom. He refused to condemn the Russians for putting bounties on the heads of U.S. service members. He exited Syria so Russia and other powers could go in and now he’s refusing to condemn Russia for this poison attack against an opposition figure.”

The panel walked through some of the things that a new administration could do to finally have a true investigation that looks into Trump’s finances and requires him to testify about specifics.

ADVERTISEMENT

See the full discussion in the videos below:

Part 1:

ADVERTISEMENT

Part 2:


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Senior DHS official slams Twitter after being locked out of account for ‘hate speech’

Published

on

On Thursday, Politico reported that Customs and Border Protection chief Mark Morgan lashed out at Twitter during a news conference on border wall construction, complaining that they had briefly locked his account under "hate speech" policies for tweeting his support of the wall.

The original tweet in question had stated that "every mile helps us stop gang members, murderers, sexual predators and drugs from entering our country."

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Here’s why counting 2020 votes could hinge on 13,500 misprinted ballots in Wisconsin

Published

on

Officials in Wisconsin are warning of delays in counting votes after 13,500 ballots were misprinted.

"The state Supreme Court declined to take a case Thursday that would tell officials in northeastern Wisconsin how to deal with misprinted ballots, raising the prospect of lengthy counting delays as clerks fill out thousands of replacement ballots on Election Day," Patrick Marley reported for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on Thursday.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Signs of a coming conflict are everywhere’: Why a 2nd Civil War would be quite different from the 1st

Published

on

In 2020, the United States has been rocked by everything from a deadly pandemic and a brutal recession to civil unrest in a long list of cities to fears that violent conflicts will occur either on Election Day or after the election. Journalist Matthew Gault, in an article published by Vice this week, wonders if the political divisions in the United States run so deep that the country is headed for another civil war.

Describing the unrest that has occurred this year, Gault writes, "People are marching in the streets, aligned with two ideologically distinct factions. Many of them, overwhelmingly from one side, are armed, and violence and death has resulted when these two sides have clashed. The signs of a coming conflict are everywhere."

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE