Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) has been thrown out of the far-right House Freedom Caucus. But according to the Wall Street Journal, she is defiant — and even publicly saying it's a good thing for her.
“I think I enjoy being a free agent a lot better,” Greene told reporters, adding that while she agreed with the Freedom Caucus ideologically, she is “interested in getting accomplishments done, not doing things just to disrupt and fight leadership. And that’s a major difference.”
Notably, while Greene is saying she is happy about the expulsion now, her behavior over the previous few days suggests otherwise. She told reporters earlier this week she had not been told anything about being ousted from the Freedom Caucus, but other reports suggested she was actually avoiding calls from other members of the Freedom Caucus so that they wouldn't be able to deliver the news to her and make it official.
This comes as the Freedom Caucus, which was founded nearly a decade ago as an insurgent group that challenges GOP leadership to move as far right as possible, is fractured and divided over its purpose and goals under House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA).
Greene's removal from the group was triggered in part by her escalating feud with Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), which escalated in recent weeks to Greene calling Boebert a "b*tch" on the House floor.
But there appear to be other factors that drove the decision too. Greene is close to McCarthy, having helped him secure the votes to become Speaker in the first place. According to previous reporting from CNN's Melanie Zanona, the Freedom Caucus distrusted her closeness to House leadership, to the point that some members even held secret meetings without her to make sure she wouldn't report on what they were planning to McCarthy's team.
The three leading Democrats in the House said in a joint statement late Thursday that they will vote no on an annual military policy bill that typically passes with overwhelming bipartisan support, citing Republican amendments restricting abortion access for service members and barring the Pentagon from covering gender-affirming care.
"Extreme MAGA Republicans have chosen to hijack the historically bipartisan National Defense Authorization Act to continue attacking reproductive freedom and jamming their right-wing ideology down the throats of the American people," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Democratic Whip Katherine Clark (D-Mass.), and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) said following hours of votes on mostly Republican-authored amendments.
U.S. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)
U.S. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)
U.S. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) Screen Grab
One Democrat, Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), voted with Republicans to attach an amendment to roll back the Pentagon's policy of reimbursing service members who travel to obtain abortion care. The amendment was sponsored by Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas), who previously served as former President Donald Trump's chief medical adviser.
Cuellar also backed Rep. Matt Rosendale's (R-Mont.) amendment to block the Department of Defense from covering gender-affirming care.
“House Republicans have turned what should be a meaningful investment in our men and women in uniform into an extreme and reckless legislative joyride," Jeffries, Clark, and Aguilar said Thursday. "The bill undermines a woman's freedom to seek abortion care, targets the rights of LGBTQ+ service members, and bans books that should otherwise be available to military families."
In opposing final passage of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the top Democrats are joining progressive lawmakers who usually vote no on the annual military policy bill due to its sky-high and ever-rising topline. The NDAA for the coming fiscal year would authorize $886 billion in total military spending, with $842 billion going to the Pentagon.
"I was the only person to vote no on committee out of 59 on the bloated defense bill," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) tweeted Thursday, referring to the House Armed Service's Committee's vote last month. "After amendments attacking abortion rights and trans rights, looks like my Dem colleagues may join me. Sometimes, it's okay to stand alone on principle."
Mounting Democratic opposition to the NDAA means Republicans will likely have to secure enough votes to pass the bill out of the House along party lines, a potentially difficult task given the intransigence of far-right members. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said Thursday that she intends to vote no after her amendment to strike $300 million in Ukraine aid from the NDAA failed to pass.
Another amendment led by Greene—a proposal to ban the U.S. government from selling or transferring cluster munitions to Ukraine—also failed Thursday, though it did receive the support of 49 Democrats, including Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), and Jim McGovern (D-Mass.).
The failure of Greene's cluster bombs amendment came after Republicans on the House Rules Committee blocked consideration of a broader proposal led by Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.) and Omar that would have prohibited the U.S. from transferring cluster munitions worldwide.
The Pentagon said Thursday that U.S. cluster munitions have arrived in Ukraine, days after President Joe Biden approved their transfer in the face of protests from human rights groups and members of his own party.
"Kevin McCarthy may be the MAGA ringmaster, but it is clear that the clowns have taken over the circus."
A final House vote on the NDAA is expected Friday. The Senate still needs to pass its version of the bill, and the two chambers must reconcile the differences.
Progressives voiced outrage over House Republicans' decision to turn the NDAA into another vehicle for their broader war on reproductive rights and LGBTQ people.
"They showed their complete disregard for our LGBTQ+ service members by adopting amendments that strip medically necessary care from transgender service members and their families, censor LGBTQ+ service members by prohibiting the display of Pride flags, and ban books that include transgender people or discuss gender identity," said Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus. "These riders cannot stand, and my colleagues and I will use every tool to get them removed during conference."
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) noted on Twitter that Rules Committee Republicans prevented a House vote on her proposals to cut the Pentagon budget by $100 billion, rein in rampant price gouging by defense contractors, and repeal the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq as they advanced their attacks on abortion access, gender-affirming care, diversity programs, climate action, and more.
In scathing remarks on the House floor ahead of Thursday's votes, McGovern—the top Democrat on the House Rules Committee—blasted "MAGA wingnuts" who "threw a fit and hijacked" the NDAA to advance their far-right agenda.
"It's outrageous that a tiny minority of Republicans is getting to dictate exactly what amendments come to the floor," McGovern said. "Kevin McCarthy may be the MAGA ringmaster, but it is clear that the clowns have taken over the circus."
Less than two weeks into her term, new Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade has become a target of a national campaign to keep former President Donald Trump from appearing on ballots in 2024.
Two advocacy groups, Free Speech For People and Mi Familia Vota Education Fund, sent Griffin-Valade and top election officials in eight other states letters this week calling on them to disqualify Trump from running for federal office. Ben Morris, a spokesman for the Secretary of State’s office, confirmed that the office received the letter.
“The agency will review it, as we do all suggestions from the public, but we have no comment on their request at this time,” Morris said.
Free Speech For People and Mi Familia Vota Education Fund invoked a rarely-used section of the Fourteenth Amendment intended to prevent former Confederates from holding federal office after the Civil War.
The Fourteenth Amendment, one of a trio of constitutional amendments adopted during the Reconstruction Era, is best known for its first section, which declares that everyone born or naturalized in the U.S. is a full citizen and deserves equal protection under the law. Section 3 of the amendment prohibits anyone who previously took an oath to support the U.S. Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof” from holding any federal office. A two-thirds vote of Congress could allow such a person to take office.
“This clause applies to Donald Trump,” the letter to Griffin-Valade said. “Having sworn an oath to support the Constitution as an officer of the United States, then ‘engaged’ in the January 6 insurrection as that term is defined by law and precedent, Trump is now ineligible to hold any ‘office … under the United States,’ including the presidency, unless and until he is relieved of that disqualification by two-thirds of both chambers of Congress.”
The advocacy groups want to block Trump from even appearing on ballots. Election officials routinely determine whether candidates are qualified to run – people who are too young for offices with age limits or don’t meet residency requirements don’t appear on ballots.
“Secretaries of state and state election officials are well within their authority to bar former President Donald Trump from the ballot,” Mi Familia Vota National Programs Manager Irving Zavaleta said in a statement. “We all know that Donald Trump incited an insurrection to stop the certification of the 2020 election. Under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, anyone who has taken the oath of office to defend the Constitution and then engages in an insurrection is disqualified from holding future public office. Trump is disqualified, and we strongly urge election officials to bar him from the ballot.”
In Oregon, candidates file a two-page form declaring their candidacy and swearing that they meet qualifications for that office. State or local election staff then review those forms and determine whether a candidate is qualified.
Whether Trump appears on ballots in Oregon ultimately wouldn’t make much of a difference. The state’s presidential primary in May is among the last in the nation, and parties typically know their nominees before Oregon voters cast their ballots.
The last Republican to win a presidential election in Oregon was Ronald Reagan in 1984, and the state’s Democratic voting record isn’t expected to change anytime soon.
Free Speech for People and Mi Familia Vota sent similar letters in 2021 to top election officials in all 50 states and Washington, D.C. The latest batch of nine letters went to secretaries of state or election board chairs in Oregon, California, Massachusetts, Colorado, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Georgia and Pennsylvania.
Some letters address specific issues
The new letters were largely identical, but the groups provided additional examples in Oregon, Michigan, North Carolina and Georgia.
The letter to Griffin-Valade cited former Secretary of State Shemia Fagan’s decision last year to prevent New York Times columnist Nick Kristof from running for governor as a Democrat because he hadn’t met a requirement to live in the state for the three years prior to election. The state Supreme Court upheld Fagan’s decision and reiterated that the secretary of state is responsible for determining whether candidates are qualified to appear on ballots.
“The January 6, 2021 attack and its facts are well documented for the secretary to know and thereby ‘take action’ to remove Trump from the ballot,” the letter said.
The Michigan letter cited a former secretary of state’s decision to leave a Libertarian Party candidate for president, Gary Johnson, off the general election ballot in 2012 because he had lost a Republican primary election earlier that year. Michigan, like Oregon, has a so-called “sore loser law” that blocks candidates who lose a primary election from running as an independent or with another party in the general election.
Letters to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold and the North Carolina State Board of Elections cite the state’s 2011 decisions to disqualify a naturalized citizen, Abdul Hassan, who filed to run for president in several states to challenge the constitutional requirement that presidents be citizens at birth.
The North Carolina letter also cites the board’s 2022 attempt to hold a hearing on a challenge to former U.S. Rep. Madison Cawthorn’s re-election bid because he promoted and spoke at a Jan. 6, 2021, rally that devolved into an attack on the U.S. Capitol. A federal district court blocked the board from holding such a hearing. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted that injunction, but by that point Cawthorn had already lost his primary and the case was moot.
A letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger cited a 2022 challenge from some Georgia voters who tried to keep U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from running for re-election. They argued that she engaged in insurrection by saying on Jan. 5, 2021, that Jan. 6 would be “our 1776 moment,” referring to the American colonies declaring independence from Britain.
Greene filed state and federal lawsuits over the challenge before Raffensperger could make his decision. A Georgia administrative law judge concluded that Greene was eligible for election because her statements were protected by the First Amendment. The judge left the ultimate decision up to Raffensperger, who allowed her to appear on the ballot and said voters would decide whether her political statements were disqualifying.
Oregon Capital Chronicle is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oregon Capital Chronicle maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Lynne Terry for questions: info@oregoncapitalchronicle.com. Follow Oregon Capital Chronicle on Facebook and Twitter.
Speaking to both Capitol reporter Garrett Haake and former GOP Speaker aide Branden Buck, Jansing said that the feud hasn't yet made it to the celebrity gossip pages.
"This is a very kind of high school cafeteria storyline, as it has been for the last week or so now," quipped Haake. "The freedom caucus doesn't publish their membership, and they have been trying to not talk about this too much."
But it's a fact that Raw Story confirmed on Wednesday when known Freedom Caucus members outright yelled at reporters to "mind your own business.
"It's clear they have become fed up with some of the activities of Marjorie Taylor Greene that, frankly, frustrated Democrats in the last Congress," Haake continued.
Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO), a Freedom Caucus member, told MSNBC that Greene has "consistently" been a problem for the caucus by attacking several members, not only Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO).
Haake said Democrats are quietly nodding as if to say, "I told you so."
That might be why Buck doesn't see any changes on the horizon.
"In some ways, she's bigger than the Freedom Caucus," he said. "What I'll be curious to see, though, is her entire brand is about being controversial. It's not being the teacher's pet. She's going to have to break out a little bit of that, and see if it comes back to bite Kevin McCarthy. The Freedom Caucus is going to be a problem with McCarthy. They exist to do that. It only takes four or five to cause a real headache. I expect the road ahead is going to be quite difficult with or without her on his side."
"She said I don't have time for the drama club, but drama is her stock in trade," Jansing zinged.
Meanwhile, Greene has been pressing her amendments to the defense reauthorization to remove any funding for gender-affirming care for American soldiers and withdraw Ukraine funding.
WASHINGTON — Since December, when the U.S. House’s Jan. 6 select committee released its damning final report, its chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), has attempted to resume his usual low profile.
But in an exclusive interview this week with Raw Story, the quiet-tempered lawmaker said his special committee “forced” the Department of Justice to finally investigate the role then-President Donald Trump and his closest associates played in fomenting the failed insurrection.
“The work of the committee kind of forced DOJ to get engaged, because a lot of what we did we passed on to them,” Thompson told Raw Story just outside the Capitol on a muggy summer day.
Thompson — with a scraggly gray beard and the unhurried gait of a 75-year-old Southern gentleman — walks alone these days. Gone is his security detail and phalanx of staffers. No more idling SUV ready to whisk him away at a moment’s notice. The gaggle of Capitol Hill reporters that used to flock about him now professionally-stalks Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), Lauren Boebert (R-CO), George Santos (R-NY) or the other GOP political flavors of the week.
U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), who served as chairman of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol. Drew Angerer/Getty Images
Everything changed when Republicans took over control of the House at the start of this 118th Congress.
Instead of investigating those who stormed the Capitol, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) introduced a censure resolution against Thompson last month, which – after more than 30 days of being public now – has only garnered one cosponsor, Rep. Dan Bishop (R-NC).
Greene and Gaetz also held a hearing into the J6 attack where the FBI, DOJ and Capitol Police were portrayed as guilty or culpable parties. The hearing took place at the very moment federal officials were arranging Trump in Miami on 37 felony charges related to his alleged mishandling of classified and other sensitive government documents.
“They're trying to normalize the abnormal,” Thompson said. “And so if that's how they see democracy at working, then that's who they are.”
Thompson told Raw Story his committee’s work speaks for itself — no matter how much Republicans try and rewrite history.
“The notion that somehow you can change the material facts in this situation, is just not the way it is,” Thompson said. “So I thought they would really legislate, come with their agenda, but their whole agenda is to undo everything that Democrats did. You gotta be in favor of something. It's like, okay, what are you gonna do? Wait until one of your wild cards say something stupid again?”
Thompson says he is proud the Jan. 6 special committee’s work is now being used by prosecutors who are convening a special grand jury in Fulton County, Ga., to investigate whether Trump attempted to illegally affect the outcome of the state’s 2020 presidential vote. The Jan. 6 committee, Thompson added, laid out an airtight case in its 800-plus page final report.
“There's no question in my mind, he knew everything that was going on. There was nothing that went on in Georgia that Donald Trump didn't know,” Thompson says.
Thompson says Georgia is key to it all, because of the recording of Trump’s call where he allegedly pressured Republican secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, to overturn the will of his people and fraudulently tilt the election against Democrat Joe Biden, who narrowly won the state.
"I just want to find 11,780 votes,” Trump said on the Georgia call.
“He got caught,” Thompson said.
“How’d he get caught? What’s the smoking gun?” Raw Story asked.
“The Raffensperger call. And now I think there’s a couple calls out in Arizona,” Thompson said, referring to a newly revealed attempt by Trump to seemingly pressure then-Gov. Doug Ducey to overturn election results in Arizona, which Biden also won.
While Thompson thinks the Georgia case is airtight, he says that doesn’t mean it’s a lock.
“I would say based on the fact that, [Trump’s] role talking to the Georgia secretary of state, him having other people serving as his surrogates go talk to people, him promoting the electors who were not duly elected — all that is part of his orchestration,” Thompson said. “Now how the district attorney presents that [evidence] and on what charges?”
Thompson is the top Democrat on the Homeland Security Committee where he’s been busy this year defending Biden from attacks over his handling of security on the southern border.
Thompson doesn’t hold press conferences and generally remains silent these days. He points back to the Jan. 6 committee’s body of work and findings.
“Under no circumstances can anybody say, ‘No, we’re gonna erase it, because what you saw with your own eyes, wasn’t what you saw.’ So the work on the committee was tremendous,” Thompson told Raw Story. “Not only did we save our democracy, but in the long run, I think we strengthened it.”
WASHINGTON — Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) compared Donald Trump's two impeachments to some of the greatest atrocities in American history Wednesday.
Speaking to Raw Story at the U.S. Capitol, Issa said that the impeachments were "wrong" and they should be made right – in the same way that the nation should have apologized for the extermination of Native Americans and the interment of Japanese Americans during World War II.
Talking about the push to erase the impeachment, spearheaded by Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene, he went on to falsely claim, "There is a track record of expunging impeachment, so it wouldn't be inconsistent."
Only three presidents in history were impeached: Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. None of them were convicted, but none of the impeachments have been expunged. Issa didn't give examples.
Greene told Raw Story that she's pushing forward with the attempt to expunge an impeachment involving a call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump attempted to solicit a bribe. Meanwhile, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) is seeking to expunge Donald Trump's impeachment for the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and the alleged attempts to overthrow the 2020 election. The latter issue may ultimately result in further indictment by the Justice Department.
Issa said, "Why should we apologize for imprisoning the Japanese during World War II? Because it was wrong and we want to make sure it's said. Why do we deal with what we did to Native Americans? Because it was wrong. Why are we looking at Medal of Honor candidates from decades ago? Because they were overlooked."
"It's never too late to right a wrong."
While there aren't exact figures, it is estimated that "European settlers killed 56 million indigenous people over about 100 years in South, Central and North America."
During the Japanese internment, 125,284 people were registered to be imprisoned because they were considered a threat to the security of the U.S. Of them 1,862 people died due to medical issues.
In a conversation with Newsweek, Georgetown University Professor Joshua Chafetz explained, "an impeachment cannot be expunged because it has effect outside of the House."
The House passes the impeachment, and the trial is in the Senate. While the House might vote to expunge the impeachment vote, it wouldn't remove the impeachment trial in the Senate unless there were 60 votes supporting it.
When asked about the expungement, Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) told Raw Story there are important challenges that the country is facing, and implied rewriting Trump's record isn't one of them.
"Focusing on things that make no difference — suggesting that Logan Roy had a point, 'These are not smart people,'" Romney said, quoting the fictional character from "Succession," based on News Corp.'s Rupert Murdoch.
"It's a classic Trump move," he continued. "There's nothing unusual about it. You ain't seen nothin' yet. There's no bottom to this pond."
"I'm mostly focused on what I'm doing and serving my district," she said. "Not interested in any drama just interested in working on the NDAA."
The NDAA is the defense-funding bill from which Greene wants to remove Ukraine. She called the Ukraine funding a "red line" for her, and she thinks that they could simply remove Ukraine from the bill to appease her.
Her other top issue for defense funding is to "put the Hyde Amendment in there." The Hyde Amendment is already a law and doesn't need to be added to any other bills. It prevents the government from paying for abortions for employees. Currently, Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) is holding up military promotions over the idea that women who need to travel to other states for an abortion can be compensated for the travel. She also wants to remove funding for transgender medical services.
When asked if she would consider running for caucus chair, she said it wasn't something she was interested in pursuing.
She was then asked if she'd attend the next caucus meeting. Greene said she's only in Congress for "my district."
Reporters brought up the dichotomy of the Freedom Caucus, saying that you can't support leadership and be in the caucus at the same time.
When asked if she was waiting for the caucus to approach her or if she was going to contact Perry, she simply said: "I don't care. I don't care. I don't think I can say that loud enough."
She went on to point out her devotion to Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA).
"I'm very grateful for his support, and I support him," she said of McCarthy. "I think he's doing a great job. He's very conservative and he's in a tough job; I don't think people recognize that enough."
She also celebrated him as the highest fundraiser of any Republican speaker in he past. The comments come amid McCarthy headlining an event for Greene on the Hill.
McCarthy sang Green’s praises in an interview with Axios on Tuesday.
“I think Marjorie Taylor Greene is one of the best members we have, I think she's one of the most conservative members and one of the strongest legislators. I support Marjorie Greene very strongly,” McCarthy told the outlet.
Asked to comment on Greene’s ouster from the Freedom Caucus, McCarthy said, “I don’t know why they would do something like that from any perspective. I think it’s a loss for the Freedom Caucus.”
McCarthy in large part owes his speakership and key legislative accomplishments, including the debt ceiling compromise, to Greene’s support.
After winning the speakership by the narrowest of margins on the 15th ballot earlier this year, McCarthy expressed his loyalty to Greene privately to a friend, who described the conversation to The New York Times on the condition of anonymity.
“I will never leave that woman,” McCarthy reportedly said. “I will always take care of her.”
Greene’s break with far-right allies began late last year when she publicly backed McCarthy’s speakership bid.
The Republican Party has been under the wholesale control of former President Donald Trump for over six years now — and experts are worried about where it's headed.
Chauncey DeVega of Salon spoke to a number of political analysts, who gave their thoughts and fears about the next steps for the GOP as it lurches to the right and reorganizes around a cult of personality.
"I see no rational universe under which Trump could prevail," said reporter and author Jill Lawrence, who has also covered the rise of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. However, she continued, "we are not living in a rational universe, we're living in one where a Trump-appointed judge just barred the Biden administration from protesting false information on social media, Trump continues to insist that the system is rigged and that he won the 2020 election, and nearly two-thirds of Republicans tell pollsters they believe or suspect that fraud put Biden in the White House." All of this poses grave threats to "the core of democracy," she added.
Columnist Wahajat Ali had a similarly bleak assessment.
"We are dealing with a radicalized and weaponized conservative movement that has fed and nurtured an extremist MAGA movement that has now overtaken the 'adults' in the room, who are in the corner, terrified, sucking their thumbs, and hoping they can avoid being devoured by their own Frankenstein monster," said Ali. As proof, he pointed to the far-right Freedom Caucus, wracked with internal divisions and booting Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) — not because she has promoted anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, but because she is too loyal to House Speaker Kevin McCarthy rather than Trump.
Matthew Dallek, who teaches at George Washington University and has covered the extreme right, believes it's unlikely Trump will win again — but that people shouldn't write him off.
"A majority of GOP voters have become more radical over the past decade. And Trump is the most effective exponent of this brand of extremism," said Dallek, explaining that "His blend of conspiracy theories, explicit racism, anti-interventionism, culture wars, and antiestablishment, apocalyptic rhetoric" make him a durable party leader, and — though not popular in the general public — not quite easy to dispatch either because of his devoted ongoing following.
Current primary polls suggest Trump is a commanding favorite, with a roughly 30 point lead over DeSantis and everyone else far behind.
James Comer is heading the House GOP's effort to investigate the Biden administration as the chair of the House Oversight Committee. But according to The Daily Beast, he should face similar ethical questions following an about-face on the expansion of gambling in his state.
Comer has long-represented a conservative Christian swath of Kentucky that has been suspicious of gambling. He voted against the building of nine new casinos in the state back in 2008, rebuking the state's influential horse-racing industry. But when he won the race for Kentucky agriculture commissioner in 2011, it was done with the help of the CEO of the company that owns the legendary Kentucky Derby racetrack – who gave the candidate the maximum $2,000 contribution.
Just a year later Comer, who is trying to tie the Biden family to allegations of bribery, testified in favor of a constitutional amendment to build seven new gambling facilities around Kentucky. Even though the amendment failed, the Kentucky Republican went on to benefit from his new-found ties to the gambling industry.
"In 2013, Comer was still carrying tens of thousands of dollars in debt from his 2011 run, the byproduct of an eleventh-hour $100,000 loan he gave to his own campaign. That spring, one of Kentucky’s most influential men held a fundraiser at his Louisville home to retire Comer’s debt: Brett Hale, then a senior vice president of Churchill Downs," The Beast's Sam Brody reported. "Thanks to maximum-level contributions from Hale and other Churchill Downs brass, the event eliminated Comer’s outstanding debt of roughly $28,000 with a haul of $36,000. Churchill Downs employees accounted for $5,300 of that total."
In 2015 just before he lost his run for governor, Comer was made an honorary co-chairman of the pro-gambling group Kentucky Wins, which was another example of his questionable ethics, according to CREW litigation counsel Stuart McPhail.
"What you’re seeing is a politician who is opposed to this ideologically, and money starts to flow to them before there’s any apparent change in view, and lo and behold, their view starts to change,” said McPhail. “There’s no speech to persuade anyone there. Money isn’t buying ads or newspaper articles… it’s being used, at the very least, to buy influence.”
“There’s a story you could tell that he just switched his views on this for pure political ambitions—or he was persuaded by other facts,” he continued. “It’s a reason why it’s often hard to suss out corrupt actions from innocent ones.”
A Comer spokesperson didn't respond the the Beast's request for comment, the website said.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) has made an unusual demand to a member of the House Freedom Caucus who wants to meet with her.
Earlier this month, Greene was ejected from the far-right group, but Chairman Scott Perry (R-PA) apparently wants to clear the air.
Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) confirmed to Punchbowl's Mica Soellner that Perry tried to contact Greene, but she refused to talk.
"She requested a meeting on the House floor instead which Norman said 'doesn't make any sense,'" Soellner revealed.
A House floor confrontation would mean the conversation would have an audience of congress members.
Greene recently admitted calling Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) a "little bitch" during a House floor confrontation. She was kicked out of the Freedom Caucus just days later.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) is facing down the prospect of yet another floor revolt from right-wing hardliners — and he's gathering leadership to try to figure out how to prevent it this time, reported POLITICO on Tuesday.
"With the House back for a final stretch before its August recess, McCarthy on Tuesday afternoon summoned a group of leaders from multiple corners of his conference to shape a strategy for staving off further right-wing revolts — which his team can’t afford this summer," reported Sarah Ferris and Jordain Carney.
"Underscoring the urgency of their task, the group of GOP lawmakers met in the shadow of what could become a new right-flank rebellion over the rule for debating a must-pass Pentagon policy bill."
This comes as 21 far-right House Republicans signed a letter demanding that McCarthy cancel the debt ceiling agreement he brokered with President Joe Biden earlier this year, which automatically issues some appropriations if no deal is reached. Such a move would allow the GOP to shut down the government as leverage to get their desired policies — but it would have no shot of passing the Senate.
During the strategy session, McCarthy acknowledged that he was facing a daunting task, according to POLITICO — and even signaled to reporters that they might not be able to get the Pentagon bill passed this week, which was a key priority.
McCarthy, who has an extremely narrow House majority to work with after a worse-than expected GOP midterm performance last year, was originally elected Speaker with a razor-thin margin after many failed ballots — the first time this happened in a century. He has faced a constant low-level threat from the far-right faction, with some lawmakers even suggesting a no-confidence vote against McCarthy after the debt ceiling deal passed — though no such vote has actually been called as of now.
The far-right wing of the party is seeing a fracture of unity itself; members of the Freedom Caucus have moved to push out Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) — though she denies any formal action against her took place — and the members are increasingly divided over how to handle their differences with McCarthy.
WASHINGTON — Republicans in the U.S. House got a slow start this week, not holding their first vote until 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday after being gone over the Independence Day holiday week.
But behind the scenes were more spats over Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and what really happened in the House Freedom Caucus. Greene herself says she still hasn't been officially told she's been booted, despite caucus members reportedly making the decision last month.
And it's not known who, if anybody, voted against the member’s removal.
"Ask her," Ralph Norman (R-SC) told reporters asking about it outside the Capitol. He was judgmental when it came to questions about what happened with Greene. Raw Story asked what the Freedom Caucus meant to him, and he rattled off a few issues, so Raw Story asked if transparency was no longer a part of that.
Perry was asked about Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD), who was the member who first shared that she'd be expelled.
"I like Andy Harris. I think he's a good guy," said Perry.
The rules for the Freedom Caucus state that for a member to be expelled, there must be a vote. Not having such a vote would break the rules. But it doesn't say that the results of that vote need to be public.
Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) refused to give any more details, saying "No comment!" before losing his temper.
"Why is the chair unable to confirm whether she was voted out," another reporter asked.
"Because it's his business!" yelled Harris. "It's none of your business! It's our business! It's none of your business!"
The sudden outburst drew chuckles from those standing near him.
"I'm sorry, all that's going on in the world, you guys are worried about — that's why nobody likes the press anymore!" Harris continued ranting.
"We've got a war going on!" Harris shouted. "And you're worried about this? Come on. Come on. No comment. Come on, guys."
Harris then rushed away.
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) said that a person has "to work really hard to get kicked out of the Freedom Caucus. It's like getting kicked out of the bar in Star Wars, right? Like, you really have to really, really try hard. They're the fringe of the fringe. For them to throw her out, I don't know what that says about them or her."
When asked about the refusal to be transparent about what happened, Swalwell said that they should be as forthcoming with the public as they would want others to be with them.