Unwilling to let Donald Trump off the hook with the help of the Republican party, and allow him to run for office again, critics of the ex-president sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) this week providing step by step instructions on how to use the 14th Amendment to make sure it happens.
Reporting for The Nation, columnist John Nichols explained that the 14th Amendment is specifically designed to deal with situations like Trump's according to historian Eric Foner.
"This can be invoked against anyone who has ever taken an oath to support the Constitution, including the president," Foner stated. "It's much simpler than impeachment. It is not a judicial proceeding. It's a political proceeding. It doesn't involve lawyers or trials. It is simply about qualification for office. You could have one afternoon of debate and a vote."
The beauty of it, he notes, is that it won't involve a trial and two-thirds of the highly polarized Senate to make it happen.
In the letter to Schumer from groups including Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Common Cause, Project on Government Oversight, Public Citizen, and Protect Democracy they maintain, "Impeachment, conviction, and disqualification might be considered the primary method for holding the former President to account, and prohibiting his return to public office. But it is not the only tool that the Constitution provides to address grave threats of this nature to the Republic. Section Three is another. Drafters of this provision were concerned that former Confederate leaders would use state and federal positions to corrode and subvert the fragile constitutional order at a time when the nation was just emerging from the Civil War."
With that in mind, they laid out a path for Democrats to follow, which begins with using the courts to pave the way.
"Pass legislation that (a) includes findings and expresses its view that Section Three applies to former President Trump and (b) establishes a formal enforcement mechanism for federal courts to determine whether Section Three applies to former President Trump (i.e., judicial review) and any other office-holder who engaged in the January 6th insurrection; or, they wrote, "Pass a resolution with factual findings and expressing its view that Section Three applies to former President Trump. Though a resolution would not have the force of law, it would cast a cloud over any future candidacy by Trump and provide grounds for further actions challenging a future candidacy."
According to the authors of the letter, that so many Republicans in the House and Senate approved of the articles of impeachment, makes the possibility of getting the legislation moving entirely possible.
"In fact, Senators on both sides of the aisle (including 13 Republicans who voted to acquit) roundly condemned the behavior itself for which the former president was on trial—behavior that, as a legal matter, is well within the scope of Section Three," they wrote.
According to Nichols, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), has already addressed invoking Section Three to disqualify Trump, telling lawmakers, "Donald Trump is right in, you know, the bullseye middle of that group," in reference to the intent of the drafters of the 14th Amendment punish those who have "given aid or comfort to" insurrection from serving in positions of power.
The letter to Schumer concluded that the congressional action needs to be taken to not only stop the former president but also serve notice to anyone who might follow in his footsteps.
"The former president may or may not instigate further insurrection or rebellion; but others, emboldened in the absence of consequence, surely will. Section Three is meant to ensure that any future presidents or would-be office-holders are dissuaded from the notion that the U.S. will permit violent insurrections to contest the will of the people," they concluded.
You can read the whole column here (subscription required).
Enjoy good journalism?
… then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.
Raw Story is independent. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.
We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.
Value Raw Story?
… then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We need your support to do what we do.
Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.
When Emily Brimmer's family dentist sent out an email that they were administering vaccines, she jumped at the opportunity. Brimmer is certainly entitled to get one: though only 36 years old, she has type 1 diabetes, lives with family and helps to take care of her 101-year-old aunt. But once inoculated, Brimmer wasn't prepared for one of the unexpected side effects: guilt.
New reporting may shed some light on the thinking of federal agents investigating the fatal January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
"A member of the far-right nationalist Proud Boys was in communication with a person associated with the White House in the days just before the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol, according to a law enforcement official briefed on the investigation. Location, cellular and call record data revealed a call tying a Proud Boys member to the Trump White House, the official said. The F.B.I. has not determined what they discussed, and the official would not reveal the names of either party," The New York Times reported Friday evening.
Sen. Joe Manchin (R-WV) surprised many with a major power play in the U.S. Senate on Friday.
"Manchin's outsized influence has cast its shadow over the Senate since the day the Democrats captured their scant 50-50 majority. He's already derailed a Cabinet nominee and led the opposition to a federal $15 minimum wage even as his party's leaders pushed for it. But Friday was Manchin's most quintessential moment: The centrist Democrat paralyzed the entire Senate for more than 10 hours and threatened to side with Republicans seeking to cut weeks of unemployment benefits," Politico reported Friday.
Thanks for your support!
Did you enjoy Raw Story this year? Join us! We're offering RawStory ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.