Ex-Mueller prosecutor points to glaring problem with Trump filing: 'Going to backfire'

classified documents discovered at Mar-a-Lago
Classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago (Photos: FBI)

Andrew Weissmann, former senior prosecutor for special counsel Robert Mueller's team, thinks Donald Trump's new filing claimed that he's being unfairly targeted for keeping classified documents at his home will flop.

MSNBC's host Nicolle Wallace explained that the critical part of the Mar-a-Lago documents case comes back to national security, and that individuals may have risked their lives to give the United States the information they contain.

Trump not only endangered that but, she said, he apparently didn't care and continued to claim the documents were his.

"When you think about what the election was about in terms of empathy being displayed by then-candidate [Joe] Biden and the lack of empathy with respect to Trump, it wasn't just sort of abstract principles that were being talked about or even with respect to just how they deal with people," Weissmann said.

ALSO READ: ‘Leave the drama to them:’ Mother of Lauren Boebert’s grandson speaks out

The lack of understanding about what leads someone to give classified information to the U.S. is what causes someone not to take their security seriously, he said.

"I'm not talking about making a mistake. That could be said by Mike Pence, Joe Biden," Weissmann explained.

Trump is claiming that, because Pence and Biden weren't prosecuted for their own storage of classified documents in their homes, he is only being prosecuted because of politics.

Wallace recalled the day of the raid on Mar-a-Lago and speaking to someone previously at the Justice Department, who conveyed that, "It had to be more than knowledge of possession. They had to have gotten p---ed that [Trump] didn't give them back."

Ultimately, Weissmann said that this filing by Trump is likely to backfire because there is an extensive email trail showing "that it was intentional for months and months." On top of that, there's also "obstruction."

"So, that lack of empathy is something that leads to this danger to national security, and I think that in terms of the reason for why you saw this extraordinary step is precisely because anybody in the White House or the executive branch would be thinking, our obligation to the public is to recover this," he explained.

Being criticized over it isn't important, the national security of the United States comes first, Weissmann said.

"It is one [of] the enormous ways it is going to backfire," the law professor told Wallace. "This is going to be denied, and it is going to be denied in a judicial decision; if not by Judge [Aileen] Cannon, she will get reversed."

"There is no way that this is going to be viewed as selective prosecution. He will say, ignore those courts, and, it's pretty hard to say that with the 11th Circuit [Court of Appeals]. Those are his people."

See the full conversation in the video below or at the link here.


Mueller prosecutor points to 'the enormous way new Trump filing 'will backfire' www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Observers hit President Donald Trump with a brutal fact-check after he made a "clinical-grade" remark during his interview on "60 Minutes."

Trump sat down for a one-on-one interview with Norah O'Donnell of CBS News on Sunday, just a day after an alleged shooter named Cole Allen opened fire during the White House Correspondents' Dinner. No one was killed during the event, and Allen was arrested by Secret Service agents, according to reports.

During the interview, O'Donnell asked Trump about a part of Allen's manifesto, which he sent to his family members ahead of the shooting, where he said he was no longer willing to let "a pedophile, rapist, and traitor" continue to "coat [his] hands in crimes."

Trump lashed out at O'Donnell for asking the question, arguing that he is not a rapist and calling her a "disgrace."

Observers offered the president a swift fact-check on social media.

"A jury and a judge adjudicated him as a rapist," Norman Ornstein, a contributing editor at The Atlantic, posted on X. "A woman credibly accused him of rape when she was 13. He bragged about walking into a dressing room with naked teenagers. He bragged about grabbing women by the p----."

"Trump is a clinical-grade psychopath," journalist Nancy Levine Sterns posted on X.

"Trump is literally a court adjudicated rapist," novelist Patrick S. Tomlinson posted on X.

"Wow. This interview was epic. Trump’s nastiness and consciousness of guilt were off the f------ charts," podcaster Andy Ostroy posted on X.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

President Donald Trump called CBS News reporter Norah O'Donnell "a disgrace" during Sunday's broadcast of "60 Minutes" when she asked for his reaction to the manifesto the alleged White House Correspondents' Dinner shooter left behind.

On Saturday, several shots were fired inside the Washington Hilton, where the dinner was being held. The alleged shooter, Cole Allen, struck one Secret Service agent in the bulletproof vest during the ordeal. Trump and all of the administration officials in attendance were swiftly whisked away after the shots rang out, according to reports. No one was killed during the incident.

Allen allegedly sent his family members a manifesto in the moments leading up to the shooting. In one part of it, he said he cannot allow "pedophile, rapist, and traitor" to continue to "coat [his] hands with crime."

O'Donnell said it was a "stunning thing to read," and asked Trump for his reaction during the interview.

"I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would, because you're horrible people," Trump snarled. "Yeah he did write that. I'm not a rapist. I didn't rape anybody."

"You think he was referring to you?" O'Donnell asked.

"I'm not a pedophile. You read that crap from a sick person," Trump continued. "I was totally exonerated. Your friends on the other side of the plate were the ones involved with, let's say, Epstein or other things."

"You should be ashamed of yourself, reading that. I'm not any of those things. You shouldn't be reading that on "60 Minutes." You're a disgrace. You're disgraceful," Trump added.

President Donald Trump's administration appears to be "faltering under the weight of its arrogance and accumulated mistakes" following the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Dinner on Saturday night, a sign that the "energy and self-confidence" Trump's administration once exuded is starting to slip away, according to a new analysis.

During the event, a lone gunman fired several rounds inside the Washington Hilton, striking one Secret Service agent in their bulletproof vest, according to reports. Trump and several cabinet officials in attendance were swiftly evacuated from the event, and no one was killed. The alleged shooter, Cole Allen, was arrested at the scene.

David Frum, a staff writer for The Atlantic, argued in a new article on Sunday that in the past, MAGA would have used the event to go after their political enemies, much like they did after the death of the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk. However, Trump has been imploring MAGA to support other aims, like completing his signature ballroom, which seems to be "radically beside the point," Frum wrote.

"Trump cares a lot about his ballroom," he wrote. "People who seek his favor have learned to care, too. But still, attempted murder as an after-the-fact justification for a home renovation? It seems not only radically beside the point but also quite a humiliating climbdown from last fall’s project to use the martyrdom of Charlie Kirk to consolidate MAGA’s political domination."

"It all feels like the ending of a chapter, a milestone of an authoritarian project’s faltering under the weight of its arrogance and accumulated mistakes," he added.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}