Ex-Mueller prosecutor points to glaring problem with Trump filing: 'Going to backfire'

classified documents discovered at Mar-a-Lago
Classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago (Photos: FBI)

Andrew Weissmann, former senior prosecutor for special counsel Robert Mueller's team, thinks Donald Trump's new filing claimed that he's being unfairly targeted for keeping classified documents at his home will flop.

MSNBC's host Nicolle Wallace explained that the critical part of the Mar-a-Lago documents case comes back to national security, and that individuals may have risked their lives to give the United States the information they contain.

Trump not only endangered that but, she said, he apparently didn't care and continued to claim the documents were his.

"When you think about what the election was about in terms of empathy being displayed by then-candidate [Joe] Biden and the lack of empathy with respect to Trump, it wasn't just sort of abstract principles that were being talked about or even with respect to just how they deal with people," Weissmann said.

ALSO READ: ‘Leave the drama to them:’ Mother of Lauren Boebert’s grandson speaks out

The lack of understanding about what leads someone to give classified information to the U.S. is what causes someone not to take their security seriously, he said.

"I'm not talking about making a mistake. That could be said by Mike Pence, Joe Biden," Weissmann explained.

Trump is claiming that, because Pence and Biden weren't prosecuted for their own storage of classified documents in their homes, he is only being prosecuted because of politics.

Wallace recalled the day of the raid on Mar-a-Lago and speaking to someone previously at the Justice Department, who conveyed that, "It had to be more than knowledge of possession. They had to have gotten p---ed that [Trump] didn't give them back."

Ultimately, Weissmann said that this filing by Trump is likely to backfire because there is an extensive email trail showing "that it was intentional for months and months." On top of that, there's also "obstruction."

"So, that lack of empathy is something that leads to this danger to national security, and I think that in terms of the reason for why you saw this extraordinary step is precisely because anybody in the White House or the executive branch would be thinking, our obligation to the public is to recover this," he explained.

Being criticized over it isn't important, the national security of the United States comes first, Weissmann said.

"It is one [of] the enormous ways it is going to backfire," the law professor told Wallace. "This is going to be denied, and it is going to be denied in a judicial decision; if not by Judge [Aileen] Cannon, she will get reversed."

"There is no way that this is going to be viewed as selective prosecution. He will say, ignore those courts, and, it's pretty hard to say that with the 11th Circuit [Court of Appeals]. Those are his people."

See the full conversation in the video below or at the link here.


Mueller prosecutor points to 'the enormous way new Trump filing 'will backfire' www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

A convicted Jan. 6 rioter was arrested for assault after touching several women on public transit.

Bryan Betancur recorded videos of himself stroking the women's hair while riding Metro trains in suburban Washington, D.C., and police arrested him after the videos circulated on social media, reported WUSA-TV.

"Bryan Betancur has been in and out of jail for stalking and threatening women," posted journalist Amanda Moore, who says she's one of the women he has stalked. "He was wearing an ankle monitor when he stormed the US Capitol on January 6, which he had been given after he broke into a Baltimore County elementary school."

The 28-year-old Betancur, who spent four months in prison for taking part in the Capitol riot, was charged with assault and battery for his actions on the Silver Line train.

The Silver Spring man wore a Proud Boys shirt to the riot, although investigators said he was not affiliated with the right-wing militant group, and he later admitted to climbing Capitol scaffolding and helping to pass furniture out a congressional office window.

He was described in charging documents as a "self-professed white supremacist" who said he wanted to be a “lone-wolf killer," but he was among more than 1,500 rioters pardoned by President Donald Trump on Inauguration Day 2025.

Betancur violated an anti-stalking order in 2024 and sent back to jail for two months and sentenced to two years probation, so he appears to still be under those conditions.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A former senior intelligence service official said on Tuesday that Marco Rubio's latest comments about the Iran war left him and other observers "speechless."

Rubio raised eyebrows with his comment on the Iran war, which largely pointed to Israel as the chief reason for the US involvement.

CNN's Alayna Treene reported this:

"Rubio speaking to reporters now says the 'imminent threat' the administration has referred to to justify US strikes on Iran was that they knew Israel was going to attack Tehran, and believed such an attack would prompt Iran to strike US bases and assets in the region."

Pod Save The World's Ben Rhodes shared Treene's reporting and replied, "America doesn't have to go to war just because Israel was going to go to war."

National security expert Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz also chimed in, adding, "If there is a strategic risk greater than Iran itself for Israel, it is the perception that Israel pushed the United States into a discretionary and open-ended war. In the current American political environment, perception matters as much as operational reality."

"Israel’s standing among younger Americans, within significant parts of the Democratic Party, and even among segments of the Republican coalition, is already under strain," he added in response to comments by Rubio.

That led to ex-CIA senior official Marc Polymeropoulos to speak out. He said, "Rubio in his statement and the admin’s decision to toss this war all on Israel may have catastrophic effects on future American support for Israel."

The expert further added:

"I texted an Israeli friend right after Rubio’s presser and said just that-it’s a step away from essentially blaming Israel (which he did) to saying ‘blame the Jews.’ I was stunned at the abject stupidity of this tact from the admin and it left me speechless. All the anti semitic crazies feel validated now."

Secretary of State Marco Rubio infuriated MAGA's already angry "America First" wing – and especially antisemitic influencers on the right – by identifying Israel as the driving force behind the U.S. military action in Iran.

The secretary of state justified the airstrikes as necessary because Israel intended to launch its own attacks on Iran, which he said would have resulted in retaliatory airstrikes against American forces, and Axios reported that set off howls of rage among President Donald Trump's right-wing base.

"Rubio's remarks were widely interpreted as making the U.S. look subordinate to Israel's interests," Axios reported. "And they inflamed already angry MAGA elites who had spent the day railing against President Trump's decision to go to war."

Pro-Trump influencers expressed their frustration that the 79-year-old president had fallen into the thrall of military hawks and neocons he explicitly ran against since entering politics, and anti-Israel voices and explicitly antisemitic influencers claimed vindication.

"So he's flat out telling us that we're in a war with Iran because Israel forced our hand," posted The Daily Wire's Matt Walsh. "This is basically the worst possible thing he could have said."

MAGA influencer Mike Cernovich described Rubio's comments as "a record scratch moment," while podcaster Megyn Kelly expressed "serious doubts" about the operation, and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon demanded more explanation about the decision.

"If we knew Israel would strike and Iran would retaliate against us, where was the coordination?" Bannon said. "We need a strategic explanation."

Nick Fuentes, an influential white nationalist who called on his "groyper" followers to abandon Trump, called the operation "a war of aggression for Israel."

"Americans will die in terrorist attacks and in missile strikes so that Israel can expand its borders in every direction," Fuentes said. "Trump, Vance, and Rubio sold us out."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}