Ex-Mueller prosecutor points to glaring problem with Trump filing: 'Going to backfire'

classified documents discovered at Mar-a-Lago
Classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago (Photos: FBI)

Andrew Weissmann, former senior prosecutor for special counsel Robert Mueller's team, thinks Donald Trump's new filing claimed that he's being unfairly targeted for keeping classified documents at his home will flop.

MSNBC's host Nicolle Wallace explained that the critical part of the Mar-a-Lago documents case comes back to national security, and that individuals may have risked their lives to give the United States the information they contain.

Trump not only endangered that but, she said, he apparently didn't care and continued to claim the documents were his.

"When you think about what the election was about in terms of empathy being displayed by then-candidate [Joe] Biden and the lack of empathy with respect to Trump, it wasn't just sort of abstract principles that were being talked about or even with respect to just how they deal with people," Weissmann said.

ALSO READ: ‘Leave the drama to them:’ Mother of Lauren Boebert’s grandson speaks out

The lack of understanding about what leads someone to give classified information to the U.S. is what causes someone not to take their security seriously, he said.

"I'm not talking about making a mistake. That could be said by Mike Pence, Joe Biden," Weissmann explained.

Trump is claiming that, because Pence and Biden weren't prosecuted for their own storage of classified documents in their homes, he is only being prosecuted because of politics.

Wallace recalled the day of the raid on Mar-a-Lago and speaking to someone previously at the Justice Department, who conveyed that, "It had to be more than knowledge of possession. They had to have gotten p---ed that [Trump] didn't give them back."

Ultimately, Weissmann said that this filing by Trump is likely to backfire because there is an extensive email trail showing "that it was intentional for months and months." On top of that, there's also "obstruction."

"So, that lack of empathy is something that leads to this danger to national security, and I think that in terms of the reason for why you saw this extraordinary step is precisely because anybody in the White House or the executive branch would be thinking, our obligation to the public is to recover this," he explained.

Being criticized over it isn't important, the national security of the United States comes first, Weissmann said.

"It is one [of] the enormous ways it is going to backfire," the law professor told Wallace. "This is going to be denied, and it is going to be denied in a judicial decision; if not by Judge [Aileen] Cannon, she will get reversed."

"There is no way that this is going to be viewed as selective prosecution. He will say, ignore those courts, and, it's pretty hard to say that with the 11th Circuit [Court of Appeals]. Those are his people."

See the full conversation in the video below or at the link here.


Mueller prosecutor points to 'the enormous way new Trump filing 'will backfire' www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

FBI Director Kash Patel's alleged personal use of government aircraft is now even starting to enrage some prominent Republican influencers.

In particular, it has fueled new conspiracy theories from far-right personality Candace Owens, who is now suggesting, without any basis, the FBI might have had something to do with the murder of Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk.

"Via FOIA, we formally requested Kash Patel’s travel itinerary for the 3 days leading up to Charlie Kirk’s assassination and we just heard back and were told the burden of the request is too great," posted Owens on X. "How is this even remotely legal?"

The FBI denies this set of events, and an official agency account accused Owens of lying in a follow-up post.

"Dear @RealCandaceO Please show us on the document sent to you ACKNOWLEDGING your FOIA request where we said: 'The burden of the request is too great,'" said the FBI's Rapid Response account, posting the letter, which asked Owens for more information to be able to process the request but did not say the exact thing she claimed. "Your 'show' just like the fake news media will be called out when you LIE! We hope this helps."

All of this comes after months of controversy and reporting on Patel's questionable use of government travel, including flying to Italy to see the Olympic Games.

Patel has broadly denied inappropriate use of government resources, and went so far as to sue The Atlantic over a bombshell report earlier this year that painted a picture of him as deeply paranoid, constantly drinking, and expecting to be fired any minute.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) had nothing but contempt for the new reports of President Donald Trump's memorandum of understanding to end the Iran war he started — noting on MS NOW's "Deadline: White House" Monday that he is leaving the United States and its allies in a considerably worse position than they were before, and even Republicans aren't rushing to celebrate it.

"So we're not even going to have a conversation about the nuclear program until we've removed all of our leverage points," noted anchor Nicolle Wallace. "What, if anything, is America getting?"

"Not much," said McCaskill bluntly.

First of all, she noted, "the only thing that Donald Trump has done here is kind of solve a problem he caused," since he was the one who escalated hostilities against Iran in the first place, and "now they're trying to pretend that he's putting out a fire that he didn't start."

Additionally, McCaskill continued, even Trump loyalists like Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) are reserving judgment for the time being. "The fact that Lindsey is expressing doubts tells you all you need to know about how, really, well, I was going to use a bad word here. This deal is it's really bad. It's not a deal."

The biggest insult of all, she continued, is to the military.

"At one point in time, we had military leadership that was strong enough to advise presidents in a meaningful way," said McCaskill. "We were seen as almost invincible in the world because of the strength of our military and its leadership. This administration is ruining the credibility of our military around the world. They are making us less safe by what they have done, because now there's a whole lot of folks out there that go, wait a minute, they can't manage a military the size of Iran?"

"No wonder Xi and Putin are high-fiving," McCaskill lamented, adding that these two rival leaders "can't believe" Trump sidetracked American power so badly at moments when they have their own ambitions. "This is nutty foreign policy. It makes us weak. It makes it dangerous for America. And it does permanent damage to our standing in the world and the standing of our military."

- YouTube youtu.be

An economist flagged a gobsmacking detail about the recent deal President Donald Trump's administration struck with the Iranian regime over the weekend that had largely been overlooked.

Henrietta Treyz, director of economic policy at Veda Partners, told CNN's Jake Tapper on "The Lead" that the Trump administration seemed to be hurrying toward a deal with Iran to end the 106-day conflict. On Sunday, the two sides agreed to a deal that would allow the Strait of Hormuz to reopen, which some experts say could provide temporary relief from high energy prices.

Treyz said that the administration's rush to the negotiating table signaled to her that time is running out to fix the economic issues caused by the war.

"The urgency at the White House to sign this deal before it's even released to the public tells me that we are running out of inventory and they are running out of time to keep gas prices below the $5 mark mark, which we're obviously succeeding at right now," she said, referring to the administration's decision to release oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserves to stabilize the U.S. oil market.

"But time is running out," she warned.

Treyz's comments came at a time when many Americans have said that the cost of living is their number-one issue as the 2026 midterms approach. The most recent economic data showed that inflation has increased by 4.2% over the last 12 months, primarily due to higher energy prices.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}