Expert flags striking legal trap in Trump admin's Iran deal: 'Hard to believe'

Expert flags striking legal trap in Trump admin's Iran deal: 'Hard to believe'
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media upon arrival at Paris Orly airport, following the G7 Summit, in Orly, France, June 17, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

A legal expert on Thursday flagged a striking detail in the deal President Donald Trump's administration and the Iranian regime signed over the weekend that could derail the agreement entirely.

Dave Aronberg, the former state attorney in Florida, said on a new episode of the "Legal AF" podcast that Trump signed a federal law that could prevent the deal from being effective. Republicans introduced a measure in a funding bill to support the war in Ukraine that designated the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization for four years, a designation that would be required to be lifted if the Trump administration wants to provide broad sanctions relief, Aronberg noted.

"How does an administration legally trap itself? Well, it comes down to this overlooked piece of legislation," Aronberg said.

"It's hard to believe that the Trump administration would actually overlook something important when it comes to foreign policy," he added.

Some of the points the Trump administration agreed to in the memorandum of understanding it signed with the Iranians on Sunday include allowing the regime to resume oil sales and establishing a $300 billion reconstruction fund for the country that could include funds from other Gulf states.

Aronberg noted that those promises are empty unless the Trump administration plans to drop the terrorist designation for the Iranian regime.

"Trump would have to formally certify to Congress that removing Iranian drone terrorists from our official terrorist watch list is vital to the national security of the United States," Aronberg said. "That's going to be a tough call for even the Republicans who normally just rubber-stamp what he wants."

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Vice President JD Vance will have to stay home instead of traveling to Switzerland to finalize the memorandum of understanding the Trump administration struck with the Iranian regime last weekend, according to a White House spokesperson.

On Sunday, Trump announced his administration had struck a deal with the regime that would immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz and provide a pathway to ending the conflict. The final agreement was initially scheduled to be signed on Friday in Switzerland.

CNN journalist Kristen Holmes reported on Thursday that a White House spokesperson told her, "The Vice President is not departing tonight." The spokesperson added that "as the Vice President said at his press conference, the plans for the upcoming technical talks have not been finalized," referring to the deal to end the Iran war.

"The U.S. delegation has been prepared to depart at the first available opportunity," the White House spokesperson told Holmes. "But the logistics of these negotiations have never been simple or predictable."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

January 6ers who attacked cops won't have much luck with a new workaround to Trump's frozen slush fund, according to a legal expert.

Former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman wrote in his Substack about a loophole meant to compensate January 6ers despite the freeze of Trump's $1.776 billion anti-weaponization fund. Litman noted that the slush fund "collapsed under bipartisan political pressure last month."

Litman was responding to an article by The Guardian that reported that January 6ers are trying to get paid anyway by filing a claim through the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), which allows compensation for people wronged by the government.

According to The Guardian, a Florida attorney and longtime friend of Trump named Peter Ticktin has helped January 6ers file about 400 FTCA claims, but Litman warned that their claims won't work.

"The FTCA route is not a workaround," Litman wrote. "It is a recapitulation of precisely the same legal problems that doomed the slush fund."

According to Litman, the Trump administration "has already tried to use the FTCA as a vehicle for self-dealing, and that attempt has been declared constitutionally suspect by a federal judge."

He added that the FTCA "is not a general compensation scheme for grievances against the government." It's narrower than that and is meant to compensate "claims arising from the negligent acts of government employees," Litman wrote.

The FTCA claims are also bound to fail because the Trump administration controls both sides of the settlement that created the fund, and the FTCA only pays bona fide settlements of legitimate "actual or imminent litigation," he added.

"The unsettling part of the Guardian report is that the political mechanism that stopped the slush fund—Republican senators confronted with a floor vote, forced to answer on the record whether they supported paying people who beat police officers—may not exist here," Litman wrote. "These are individual cases, filed quietly across multiple dockets, without a single vote to cast or press conference to hold."

"Courts need to be prepared to jump in and call out this latest maneuver for the bogus self-dealing that it is," Litman added. "Whether the president settles with himself through a $10 billion IRS lawsuit, a $1.776 billion slush fund, or 400 individual FTCA claims filed by a friend of his in Florida, the answer is the same: the government cannot be its own adverse party."

The actions of President Donald Trump's prosecutors in a high-profile case have opened a "Pandora's box" that could unravel the Trump Department of Justice's ambitions, according to one legal analyst.

Liz Dye, host of the "LegalEagle" podcast, said during a new episode on Thursday that the damage Trump DOJ's actions have caused in the so-called Broadview Six case could be "hard to contain." Trump prosecutors were caught lying to grand jury members and attempting to withhold evidence of their misdoings captured in the grand jury transcripts. The prosecutors later dropped the case to prevent the transcripts from being released to the judge.

"It's clear they're not going to be able to limit the damage to just this case," Dye said.

The Broadview Six case arose from a protest outside the Broadview ICE facility in Chicago. The DOJ prosecuted six of the protesters with conspiracy and obstruction, but the case fell apart in a stunning fashion in May 2026. The six former defendants have since asked the government to appoint a Special Counsel to look into the case, All Rise News reported.

Dye noted that judges have started to notice this conduct as well. When the Broadview Six transcripts were finally released, Dye said the judge overseeing the case described them as a "Pandora's box" that raised further questions about the department's credibility.

"I'm guessing this grand jury mess isn't going back in the box anytime soon," Dye said.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}