'Not healthy': Legal expert slams Supreme Court's lack of 'transparency' amid Trump case
Official White House photo by Andrea Hanks.

The U.S. Supreme Court just signaled that it's unhealthy and may be unable to handle a Donald Trump case currently before it, a legal expert said on Tuesday.

Lisa Rubin, a legal analyst on MSNBC, pointed to an investigation by the New York Times, which revealed the inner-workings of the Supreme Court behind the scenes as it dismantled the right to abortion. According to Rubin, there was a headline buried in there.

"I keep thinking about [Jodi Kantor] & [Adam Liptak]'s piece about SCOTUS--and specifically about the agreement to grant cert in Dobbs but conceal that decision from the public (and on the Court's docket) for months," Rubin said. She added that, "As a result of that agreement, a case that 5 members of the court agreed to hear instead looked as if it was being held over for further discussion again and again and again and again."

ALSO READ: A neuroscientist’s guide to surviving Christmas with Trump-loving relatives

On the importance of the issue, Rubin further noted, "You might be thinking, 'So what? Why is that such a big deal?' It matters to me because if the reporting is accurate, the Supreme Court docket was not, and purposefully so."

She continued:

"If the justices can't be counted on to be transparent about a relatively mundane aspect of their decisionmaking process (other than their actual opinions) that we are entitled to see, what else are they concealing for the sake of their own reputations & 'legitimacy'?" Rubin asked.

Finally, the lawyer concluded:

"It's one more disquieting signal that the Court is not healthy the night before Trump owes those same nine people a brief in a case pivotal to our democracy and the rule of law," she said.