Quantcast
Connect with us

‘Lies, omissions, and smears’: Mag that exposed Duggar scandal smacks back at Fox whitewash interview

Published

on

The magazine that broke open the Josh Duggar sexual molestation scandal covered up by his parents eight years ago has responded to their overly sympathetic interview on Fox News with host Megyn Kelly, saying the couple lied, smeared  police authorities, and lied by omission Wednesday night.

According to In Touch, multiple statements made by Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar during the hour-long interview could have been easily disproved on air if Fox researchers had done their homework and read the documents and statements that were publicly available before Kelly conducted her interview.

ADVERTISEMENT

In Touch specifically took issue with the Duggar’s assertion that the sealed juvenile file containing information on Josh Duggar’s sexual assaults on five young girls — including four of his sisters — was obtained illegally using the FOIA.

According to Jim Bob Duggar, “This information was released illegally,” with the couple accusing Springdale police chief Kathy O’Kelley of possibly taking “a bribe” and having “an agenda.”

As In Touch notes, the file was obtained legally, with the Northwest Arkansas Democrat Gazette already writing that claims otherwise are “disputed by the law enforcement agencies involved, the Arkansas Press Association and attorneys with expertise in public-document cases involving the state’s Freedom of Information Act.”

According to John Tull, a Little Rock attorney who specializes in public-record cases, “They had to release the reports. Those records are not closed under FOI. The alleged perpetrator had attained his majority at the time it was released, and once his name and all the victims’ names were blacked out, it was subject to FOI.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Disputing O’Kelley was behind the release, In Touch reminded the couple that they were also able to request the file under the FOIA from the Washington County Sheriff’s Office which is independent of O’Kelley.

While Jim Bob Duggar explained that he and his son willingly met with police to discuss what had happened, notes on one of the publicly available reports specifically states that Josh Duggar canceled an important interview with a police investigator, with his father leaving a voice-mail saying saying his teen son had lawyered-up.

“On Tuesday, December 19, 2006 at approximately 1300 hours D. Hignite received a voice mail from Jim Bob Duggar in reference to the interview with [redacted, Josh]. Det. Hignite received a voice mail from Mr. Duggar stating that [redacted, Josh] had hired an attorney and will not be coming in for interview,” the report stated.

ADVERTISEMENT

While Duggar maintained that, as parents, he and his wife were not legally “mandated” to report their son’s transgressions, Michael Johnson, a former United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, disagreed, saying, “It is possible that investigators looking into this case could have cited the parents Jim Bob Duggar and Michelle Duggar with Arkansas Code 5-27-221 ‘Permitting Abuse of a Minor.’ Having once learned of the behavior, they recklessly allowed it to continue.”

According to Johnson, the Duggars could have been subject to  six years of imprisonment and a $10,000 fine.

Megyn Kelly stated the Duggars “hadn’t gotten a heads-up” about the release of Josh’s police report which the Duggars did not dispute during the interview. However In Touch has obtained documents that show the city of Springdale did alert them before releasing the records although they were not obligated to do so.

ADVERTISEMENT

In Touch editors continue to make all the documents they have uncovered available to anyone who visits their website.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Is a strange Twitter glitch censoring the left?

Published

on

The Working Families Party, a New York-based progressive political party, has a reputation befitting its name as a left-populist political organization. So when the organization endorsed the center-left Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren — who was once a hardcore Republican and has emphasized her capitalist credentials — over the explicitly democratic socialist candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sanders (I-Vt.) supporters were understandably disappointed. After all, the party overwhelmingly endorsed Sanders in the previous presidential election. What had changed?

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

NYC mayor Bill de Blasio ending his Democratic presidential campaign

Published

on

New York City mayor Bill de Blasio has ended his Democratic presidential campaign.

De Blasio made the announcement Friday on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," where he explained his decision.

"I feel like I've contributed all I can to this primary election," he said, "and it's clearly not my time."

The mayor said he was optimistic about the Democratic Party's chances in the 2020 election, no matter who was nominated to face President Donald Trump.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

CNN lays out damning timeline of Trump and Giuliani’s calls to Ukraine seeking dirt on Biden

Published

on

Following Rudy Giuliani's extraordinary appearance on CNN on Thursday night, where he may have admitted the commission of a crime, the hosts of CNN's "New Day" compiled a timeline linking the approximate date of Trump's phone call that was flagged by a whistleblower to subsequent events involving Ukraine.

According to the timeline, presented by hosts John Berman and Alisyn Camerota, Trump spoke with the president of Ukraine on July 25, with Giuliani meeting with him later that month.

What followed was the August 12 whistleblower complaint and then Trump blocking aide to Ukraine by the end of the month.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image