Quantcast
Connect with us

‘They underestimated it until it was too late’: Obama officials reportedly had warning about Russia for last 3 years

Published

on

Officials in President Barack Obama’s administration along with national intelligence leaders were dismissive of the warning that the Kremlin was building a disinformation arm that could be used to interfere in Western democracies.

According to a Politico report, the Obama administration had many warnings between 2014 and 2016 that Russia was stepping up its intelligence operations to build propaganda networks.

“You have no idea how extensive these networks are in Europe … and in the U.S., Russia has penetrated media organizations, lobbying firms, political parties, governments and militaries in all of these places,” a Russian source said, according to a 2014 report.

While there wasn’t a specific or explicit warning in the report, a former White House official revealed that the Obama administration noticed an uptick in disinformation coming out of Russia. There were harsher warnings after Russia’s involvement in the Ukrainian elections in 2014.

“Even if the Russians and [Russian president Vladimir] Putin had these ambitions, they were doubtful of their capacity to execute them,” the official told Politico.

ADVERTISEMENT

President Donald Trump also blamed Obama for the Russian election hacks, going so far as to claim it was he that colluded with Russia.

“Well I just heard today for the first time that Obama knew about Russia a long time before the election, and he did nothing about it,” Trump told Fox News in a June interview. He was responding to a Washington Post report that first revealed the inside information. “But nobody wants to talk about that. The CIA gave him information on Russia a long time before they even – before the election…It’s an amazing thing. To me – in other words, the question is, if he had the information, why didn’t he do something about it? He should have done something about it. But you don’t read that. It’s quite sad.”

While Trump criticizes Obama, he has yet to do anything about the Russian intrusion.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ned Price, the former spokesperson for the National Security Council, told Politico that the administration did not ignore any of the warnings, far from it.

“The Obama administration was nothing but proactive in responding to Russian aggression in all of its forms, especially as Moscow became more brazen with and following its military moves against Ukraine beginning in 2014,” Price said. He cited the sanctions against Russia and an increase in NATO support.

Still, there was no public warning that came from the government to political parties or news media. Former CIA Director John Brennan said that this was a first for the U.S. and they were cautious in dealing with it. “There was no playbook for this,” he told the Aspen National Forum.

ADVERTISEMENT

“[Intelligence officials] had a list of things they could never get the sign-offs on,” one intelligence official who wanted to remain anonymous told Politico. “The truth is, nobody wanted to piss off the Russians.”

The proposals included closing the Russian compounds and expelling diplomats were some of the recommendations that were ultimately enacted by the U.S. after the interference in the 2016 election. The U.S. also finally began engaging in counterintelligence efforts to demonstrate a willingness to fight back against Putin.

“The options were being discussed. They weren’t being implemented,” a former official claimed.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, it was the State Department (under Secretary John Kerry) the Pentagon that refused harsher tactics encouraged by the intelligence community, another official said. It was feared that such actions would have made diplomatic staff and defense attaches a target.

“The reports from sources deep inside the Russian government were alarming,” an official still serving in the U.S. government told Politico. “We started getting stuff in April, May [2014] that was extraordinary about the extent of the threat and the capacities the Russians were building.”

Another former Obama official said that they feared Putin would “test” them.

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, the Obama administration was reluctant to go into full attack mode with strong counterintelligence measures.

“It just seemed like it was difficult, especially after the Crimea and the Ukraine … there still wasn’t a willingness to more heartily engage in the effort,” a former intelligence officer told Politico.

A former NSC official said that for a long time Kerry refused to even consider shutting down the Russian compounds in the U.S. Kerry’s representative disagreed, saying he wanted to shut down the dachas but hadn’t settled on the timing.

ADVERTISEMENT

By the summer of 2016, days before the DNC emails were released, a CIA officer was brutally beaten outside of a U.S. embassy in Moscow. The Obama administration was given multiple options to retaliate, but chose to do nothing right away.

“There was some real anger,” said a former intelligence officer. “We weren’t going to mug anybody, but we could at least be more overt in our coverages. We could expel some people, we could do more overt surveillance on people.”

Another officer explained that the longer they waited the harder Russia pushed back. In previous reports, after the release of the emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the White House feared reacting would look political. Intelligence crafted a list of more than 100 Russian diplomats that could be expelled, but national security agencies pushed back.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Any of these actions risked a Russian reciprocation,” said the former NSC official. “We were kind of caught in a catch-22.”

The official explained that for months nothing was done. Finally after the election, they acted on 35 Russian diplomats. While the move was largely symbolic, for intelligence officers, Politico explained that it was too little and far too late.

The frustration of many intelligence officers continues as Trump’s bluster seems bigger than his bite. They see his election as an inevitable outcome of years of counterintelligence failures and inaction.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They were warned. They underestimated it until it was too late,” the current administration official said of the Obama White House and Russia, with a tinge of bitterness. “They just didn’t know how to deal with the bad guys.”


Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Kim Jong-un threatens to restart nuke tests as Trump’s efforts to talk to the regime fall apart again: report

Published

on

On Tuesday, CNN's Brian Todd reported that the North Korean regime is on the brink of rescinding what little they promised President Donald Trump, as the future of his efforts to continue talks appear uncertain.

"Kim Jong-un's regime is once again in negotiation by intimidation," said Todd. "Just two weeks after their historic meeting at the DMZ, and President Trump's short stroll into North Korea, North Korea's dictator Kim Jong-un appears to be threatening to start testing his nuclear weapons again. In a new statement, Kim's foreign ministry calls the joint U.S./South Korean military exercises planned for next month a breach of the main spirit of what President Trump and Kim agreed to in Singapore, and says, 'We are gradually losing our justifications to follow through on the commitments we made with the U.S."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘He’s ignorant — not stupid’: NYT columnist says Trump is trying to ‘bait’ Democrats because he wants to run against AOC

Published

on

President Donald Trump is not going to get the 2020 opponent he wants, so he's going to pretend that his actual opposition is being led by the four young women in Congress known as The Squad, New York Times columnist Frank Bruni wrote on Tuesday.

Trump has spent the last few days with racist attacks on the four first-term members, who are Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Nickel and Dimed’ for the sharing economy: Inside the hellish new reality of low-wage work

Published

on

In 2001, journalist Barbara Ehrenreich's investigative book "Nickel and Dimed" revealed to those who weren't on low-wage payrolls how expensive it is to be a member of the working poor in America. Some things haven't changed since Ehrenreich's experiences working as a Walmart clerk, a restaurant server and a maid, among other jobs. Housing can still be prohibitively expensive on low hourly wages, and high turnover remains a constant. Workers still risk their health — mental, physical and emotional — every precarious day.

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

close-image