Washington Post investigative reporter David A. Fahrenthold revealed to CNN’s Chris Cuomo Monday that so many nonpartisan and nonprofit organizations have pulled their balls and galas from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago that conservative groups are stepping in to help.
After groups like the American Red Cross, Susan G. Komen and the American Cancer Society have all changed their event location after criticism. Since all of the groups have pulled their support, right-wing groups that support Trump are moving in.
Fahrenthold explained that Trump can make as much as $275,000 each night from a single gala hosted at Mar-a-Lago.
“Last year while Trump wasn’t president, he basically kept the same schedule,” Fahrenthold said. “The Palm Beach society still came, the way they always had. That changed over the summer. President Trump’s comments about Charlottesville, where he said, ‘There were very fine people among the white supremacists protesting in Charlottesville.’ Those caused a huge exodus of charities. Out of the 25 charities he had booked for this upcoming season, he had 25 events booked, 19 cancelled. Huge clients.”
It wasn’t simply that Trump lost the money, he also lost the exposure to Palm Beach high society, who would flock to his club for the events.
CNN host Chris Cuomo called it “obviously political,” noting that those who have taken place are the groups who are looking for a political attachments. Trumpettes USA, Truth About Israel Gala and the Christian Broadcasting Network have all announced galas at Mar-a-Lago.
“To fill in those empty gala days, you seeing these events that are either Trump’s political allies like Pat Robertson, the televangelist,” Fahrenthold explained. “He didn’t have a gala. He had a charity, but he never had a gala before. He started one this year and purposely put it at Mar-a-Lago.”
The other two, Fahrenthold said, are hard to even call charities because they aren’t there to raise money for a charity, they’re at Mar-a-Lago to help “put money in Donald Trump’s pocket.”
“So they’re just going to pay him money through Mar-a-Lago because they support him,” Fahrenthold explained. “That’s not an event evolution of Mar-a-Lago from basically an apolitical place that sold luxury to a place now selling Trump’s political alliances.”
Watch the full conversation below:
‘Dangerous linguistic power’: A historian explains how Trump weaponizes nicknames
Is Donald Trump the modern day Earl Long?
A three-time Louisiana governor, Long mastered the art of political ridicule seven decades ago by weaponizing nicknames. The hilarious names Long pinned on his rivals, and the rollicking stories he told about them, riveted audiences bored by puffed-up rhetoric.
While Long’s stunts may be remembered as silly hijinks, there was a sly, often deadly serious, purpose to his technique. He used it to get voters to laugh at his foes and to put them on the defensive––a place politicians never want to be. Tucked within Long’s jests were razor-sharp attacks aimed at exploiting opposition weaknesses––hidden swords inside a pea-patch cloak.
Walmart got a $2.2 billion tax cut — now it’s laying off workers
Walmart announced it will lay off hundreds of workers in North Carolina despite receiving billions in tax cuts that the Republican Party and President Trump claimed would spur job growth.
The giant retailer will lay off about 570 employees and close its corporate office near the Charlotte airport, despite signing a 12-year lease just four years earlier, the Charlotte Business Journal reported.
The work done at the Charlotte facility will be outsourced to a firm in Arkansas, according to the report.
Amazon, Google and Facebook warrant antitrust scrutiny for many reasons – not just because they’re large
There’s a growing chorus of U.S. politicians, antitrust scholars and consumer watchdogs calling for stricter antitrust treatment of Amazon, Google, Facebook and other tech giants. Some even say they should be broken up.
Most recently, U.S. lawmakers launched a sweeping review to determine if these companies have become so big and powerful that they are stifling competition and harming consumers, while federal regulators are also gearing up to take action.