Quantcast
Connect with us

Here’s the Republicans newest tactic for failing Americans on COVID relief

Published

on

- Commentary
President Donald J. Trump and Vice President Mike Pence walk with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Senator Roy Blunt, R-Mo., Tuesday, March 10, 2020, upon their arrival to the U.S. Capitol for a Senate Republican policy lunch. (Official White House Photo by D. Myles Cullen)

So, Donald Trump wants to have the bigger one when it comes to stimulus.

Now, that’s great to hear, maybe. As of Sunday morning–and it’s most definitely subject to change–Trump’s chief economic adviser, Larry Kudlow, was making strange sounds on CNN about outbidding House Democrats’ latest $2.2 trillion bill for COVID-19 federal relief.

Confused? You’re not the only one.

Just last Thursday, Trump deflated members of his party and the gasping American people by petulantly calling off talks of any sort of relief bill. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were said to be close to a federal COVID-relief agreement after more than six months of nothing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump apparently saw no need for it after having personally killed the virus, in his fogged mind.

“I have instructed my representatives to stop negotiating until after the election when, immediately after I win, we will pass a major Stimulus Bill that focuses on hardworking Americans and Small Business, Trump tweeted five days ago.”

As with so many pronouncements from Trump, this one was credible for just dozens of minutes. He started backtracking before either side had time to digest this troubling–and possibly drug-induced–development. Here’s how the Associated Press covered the roller-coaster ride:

“Hours later, Trump appeared to edge back a bit from his call to end negotiations. He took to Twitter again and called on Congress to send him a “Stand Alone Bill for Stimulus Checks ($1,200)” — a reference to a pre-election batch of direct payments to most Americans that had been a central piece of negotiations between Pelosi and the White House.”

Trump stood firm that it was a higher priority to ram through SCOTUS pick Amy Coney Barrett than it was to rush aid to Americans. Until Sunday’s news, which will likely be contradicted by Monday’s news.

ADVERTISEMENT

You might remember that on March 27, Congress enacted, and Trump signed, the $2.2 trillion CARES Act. The parties expressed consensus at the time that subsequent federal spending might be needed, depending upon the trajectory of the pandemic.

As of that date, the U.S. had reported just 1,300 deaths among 85,991 COVID-19 cases. Today, barely more than half a year later, those numbers stand at 220,000 deaths among 8 million cases, horrifying statistics rising literally by the second.

You think maybe something more than zero should have been forthcoming? It wasn’t. Some of the ensuing drama would have been comical had it not been so tragic for the real world.

ADVERTISEMENT

On May 15, the Democratic House passed a $3.4 trillion bill known as the HEROES Act, that would have helped a whole lot of people, including ones that have since died. Republicans were appalled at the very thought of such irresponsible spending.

Trump called the measure “dead on arrival.” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell termed it “an unserious product from an unserious majority,” a sign that he wasn’t anxious to have coffee anytime soon with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

ADVERTISEMENT

He didn’t. Moscow Mitch struggled mightily with his own caucus in the Senate, with many members disinterested in doing anything at all.
McConnell labored like a turtle running a marathon to get a much smaller $1 trillion relief package on the board by late July only to have it derailed amidst a public spat with Trump.

Remember why? Because someone had snuck into the bill a $1.75 billion new FBI headquarters near Trump’s hotel, for the undeniable purpose of preventing someone else from building a hotel to compete with Trump’s. Even Republicans condemned that.

Trump eloquently had dismissed his own party’s Senate bill as “sort of semi-irrelevant,” the Washington Post reported. It died.

ADVERTISEMENT

Then came the pathetic attempt at a $500 billion “skinny bill” from McConnell and the Republicans in September. That attempt to appear to be doing “something” without helping “Democrat led” states and cities–per Trump–also died a deserved death.

Then came the House’s $2.2 trillion bill, again jeered by Republicans, with Q-Anon whisperer Kayleigh McEnany repeating the earlier language about Pelosi being “not serious.”

So, it’s back to the drawing board for Pelosi and Mnuchin, presuming White House aides can keep Trump away from his Etch-a-Sketch.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Georgia Republicans slammed for only caring about Trump’s voter fraud lies when it threatens to harm them

Published

on

Republicans are growing increasingly worried that conspiracy theories about mass election fraud may depress voter turnout and could cost them in the upcoming Georgia runoffs, and according to the Washington Post's Greg Sargent, there's a "vile aspect" to this development that's no laughing matter.

"Georgia Republicans don’t mind when Trump lies about the integrity of their elections in a way that they think will help them," he writes. "They only mind when Trump lies about the integrity of their elections in a way that threatens to harm them."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

More Republican Senators seem open to another huge stimulus — despite McConnell’s resistance

Published

on

While COVID-19 vaccines are on their way, the impact of the pandemic has worsened in the United States due to large gatherings, holiday travel and the ongoing resistance of some to wear a mask. Eviction rates are climbing, contributing to more COVID cases, bankruptcies are up too, and small businesses are struggling to stay afloat or closing their doors forever.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump’s legal challenge faces another setback in Wisconsin

Published

on

President Donald Trump's legal challenges suffered yet another loss in his long-shot bid to overturn his election defeat.

Wisconsin's Supreme Court denied a petition by his lawyers to challenge the president's loss there, bringing their record in such cases to one win and 41 losses, reported the Associated Press.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday morning against the state's Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and various county election officials, asked to exclude 221,000 ballots fro the results over alleged instances of fraud and illegal conduct.

Continue Reading