At the same time that Donald Trump is demanding $1 billion for his ballroom to fill the space where the East Wing used to be, congressional leaders are facing the prospect that the Rayburn House Office Building where they work is falling apart and needs a massive renovation.
To the tune of an estimated $9 billion.
According to Politico's Katherine Tully-McManus, the renovation represents a "ticking time bomb" that cannot be postponed much longer without risking systemic collapse affecting members of the House.
The Rayburn building has not undergone a complete renovation since opening in 1965, the Politico report notes, before adding that lawmakers have repeatedly deferred comprehensive repairs while critical systems are failing with increasing frequency, and expensive emergency fixes are "draining" the legislative branch budget.
Thomas Austin, Architect of the Capitol, warned lawmakers Wednesday of the imminent threat of "catastrophic system failures" in the sprawling facility, which houses nearly 200 member offices, committee hearing rooms, secure information facilities, a police firing range, and approximately 1,600 parking spaces.
"As these facilities age and kind of reach this tipping point, we start having an increasing number of failures as all these systems age out and we start having series of failures on top of each other," Austin told the House Administration Committee.
Austin's agency estimates a complete renovation could cost nearly $9 billion and require more than a decade—the largest and most expensive project ever undertaken by the Architect of the Capitol, dwarfing any previous renovation on Capitol Hill by nearly an order of magnitude.
House Administration Chair Bryan Steil (R-WI) called the price tag "eye-popping," noting it exceeds the construction costs of the newest NFL stadiums.
Beyond the staggering expense, lawmakers face operational nightmares, the report notes. The renovation cannot proceed wing-by-wing as the recent nearly $1 billion renovation of the neighboring Cannon House Office Building demonstrated—that decade-long project severely disrupted congressional operations. Instead, Rayburn would require near-total evacuation, forcing members and committees to find alternative space.
Since project timelines stretch to approximately 20 years, many current lawmakers openly assume they will no longer serve by the time the project begins, let alone concludes, Politico's Tully-McManus observed.
