• Subscriptions
    • Log in
    Ad-Free Login - Go Ad-Free & Join The Movement
    The fight for Democracy hasn’t ended. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Support honest journalism.
    The fight for Democracy hasn’t ended. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Support honest journalism.Click to enable push notifications.
    Listen Now: The New Raw Story PodcastUS NEWSOpinionvideoget the newsletter
    AD-FREE LOGIN
    Ad-Free Login - Go Ad-Free & Join The Movement
    The fight for Democracy hasn’t ended. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Support honest journalism.
    The fight for Democracy hasn’t ended. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Support honest journalism.Click to enable push notifications.
    • Home
    • New: Shop to Support Independent Journalism
    • We Have Issues
    • Trump
    • U.S. News
    • Video
    • Ad-Free Login
    Tired of ads? Want to support our progressive journalism? Click to learn more.
    JOIN FOR $1

    The Texas disaster and COVID-19 have made it impossible to deny that the GOP ideology is dangerous mythology

    Terry H. Schwadron, DCReport @ RawStory
    February 18, 2021

    Thanks for your support!

    This article was paid for by reader donations to Raw Story Investigates.

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott on Fox News.
    Screengrab.

    This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

    Terry H. Schwadron, DCReport @ RawStory

    We don't have to look very hard to see some common themes running through the Texas freezes, consternation over school re-opening and the worries over significantly unseen recent cyber-attack on U.S. government agencies and private company networks.

    In fact, at a glance, there's a recognizably simple demand on the table that we have a government that can anticipate emergencies, plan for them and stand ready to execute, rather than suffer the talk of lawmakers who insist on throwing the inevitable verbal bombs about ideology. Thinking otherwise, that we can stint on investment and preparation is as effective as sticking your head in an oven and yelling.

    For Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott and Fox News commentators to spend their time blaming wind turbines for years of forgoing investment in a weather-resistant statewide electric grid dependent on fossil fuel sources is not only silly; we now see it is dangerous. The state's insistence that Texas remain out of the two national electrical grids to avoid federal rules has come home to roost.

    Emergencies don't just get dealt with spontaneously. They require procedures and investment to invoke when they are needed.

    Having spent a lot of years overseeing news, production and technology issues in newsrooms, I can assure you that emergencies don't just get dealt with spontaneously. They require procedures and investment to invoke when they are needed. That Y2K deadline that passed without serious incident in 2000, for example, was not the result of luck; the lack of problems resulted from months of planning and rebuilding. The ability of The New York Times, where I worked, to continue publishing digitally and in print despite a blackout that hit a large portion of the aregion required adaptation, but came about because we had anticipated such a problem.

    That decision by the Donald Trump White House to shut down its National Security Council pandemic office had consequences in delaying the response to coronavirus. This raging debate we're having about whether teachers must be vaccinated before schools open overlooks the obvious need to look at having appropriate ventilation in aging school buildings.

    The continuing reports about bridges failing, outmoded airports and failing mass transit systems are open pleas for giving government the money to fix things.

    Disasters All

    Add into emergencies our incessant need to find blame – usually skewering a political foe – and you have the legends of hurricanes dating back to Katrina, wildfires in California, floods, tornadoes and even terrorist attacks. You have all the effectiveness of a Donald Trump throwing paper towels to workers in Puerto Rico.

    For Governor Abbott to attack the aspirational Green New Deal proposals for climate while people are freezing in their homes doesn't help make either heat or water start working again. It just makes him look as if he is trying to use the problem for partisan political points, which he is.

    Even worse, his predecessor, Rick Perry, unbelievably the U.S. Energy Secretary under Trump, says that for Texans to go days without power is a sacrifice they should be willing to make if it means keeping federal regulators out of the state's power grid.

    Whether for freezes or hurricanes, pandemics or terror attacks, Americans want to be able to count on some government agency to have anticipated the issue and to be ready to act.

    With the climate changes now worsening every major storm, it is anticipatable that we will be seeing more severe effects on systems of all kinds. With rising tensions and rivalries in international relations, we've long expected that our military and national security agencies will have adjusted to whom they are listening.

    With months of anti-election organizing and actions by pro-Trump forces who refused to recognize the November elections, we should have been able to anticipate a problem that became the Jan. 6 swarm on the U.S. Capitol.

    We Resist Government

    The Texas story is pretty straightforward: "What has sent Texas reeling is not an engineering problem, nor is it the frozen wind turbines blamed by prominent Republicans. It is a financial structure for power generation that offers no incentives to power plant operators to prepare for winter. In the name of deregulation and free markets, critics say, Texas has created an electric grid that puts an emphasis on cheap prices over reliable service," reports The Washington Post.

    In the case of the coronavirus, it was an insistence by the feds for the states to deal with the problem. With Joe Biden, we finally have a plan rolling out, though it too is drawing complaints about speed and uncertainties about when it will be complete – as if that is the only goal. We remain unprepared for changes in climate, immigration, population, manufacture and education.

    With all that in mind, it seems more than weird that we have not yet moved very far in Congress on adopting the coronavirus aid package, though it is inching along as a one-party proposal. How do we square having general upset in the country over a patchwork of half-open, half-closed schools if we are not providing the funds to ensure safety for students, teachers and staff? For that matter, how do we account for Americans refusing to wear protective masks in the name of personal convenience and resistance to government orders?

    We are ready at the drop of any hat to be insistent on immediacy without doing the work or raising the money. We'd rather find fault with our partisan foe than try to put in place the institutional network that would help us to succeed.

    Only now are we really assessing the effects of those cyber-attacks thought to have been directed by Russia, and already we have questions about when damages still being assessed will all be fixed.

    The takeaway here is equally straightforward: If we want immediate response to public problems, we need the work – and the will – to be ready. In most cases, we have neither.

    This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

    Enjoy good journalism?

    … then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

    Raw Story is independent. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

    We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.

    Value Raw Story?

    … then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We need your support to do what we do.

    Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

    Report typos and corrections to: corrections@rawstory.com.
    READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION

    Do you approve of Biden's presidency so far?

    'Where's Jared Kushner?' New intel report blaming Saudi prince for Khashoggi murder raises questions

    Travis Gettys
    February 26, 2021

    A newly released U.S. intelligence report directly implicates Saudi crown price Muhammad bin Salman for approving a plan to gruesomely murder Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi -- but one name was conspicuously absent.

    The Office of the Director of National Intelligence report said the crown prince viewed the Saudi Arabia-born Khashoggi as a threat to his power and broadly supported his assassination, but many wondered why there was no mention of Jared Kushner -- former president Donald Trump's senior adviser and son-in-law.

    Kushner and the crown prince spoke privately and informally with the crown prince while serving in the White House, and questions swirled around their relationship, which continued in the same fashion even after Khashoggi's grisly murder.

    But the report does not indicate whether Kushner or Trump were aware of the plan to murder the U.S.-based journalist, prompting even further questions.


    Good thing Jared Kushner helped him “weather the storm” on this one https://t.co/ixkG8roAJE
    — Virginia Heffernan (@Virginia Heffernan)1614364966.0



    For two years, we pushed for the truth to be made public:

    The highest levels of the Saudi government, including Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, are responsible for the brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi.

    There must be accountability, and we will continue to press for it. https://t.co/gAdf9apsPU
    — Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) February 26, 2021


    In 2018, Trump downplayed intel pointing to the Saudi crown prince for Khashoggi's murder. Regarding whether MBS knew, Trump said in a statement at the time, “Maybe he did and maybe he didn't!" Today US intel releases a report that MBS approved operation.
    — Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) February 26, 2021


    A US intelligence report found that MBS approved Jamal Khashoggi's killing in 2018. Around that time, MBS and Jar… https://t.co/Y2JtJffvUM
    — Citizens for Ethics (@Citizens for Ethics)1614363996.0


    Confirms what we suspected all along. Now lock Kushner & his FIL up.
    — Bernie's Mittens Are Speaking (@Peacefulrealit1) February 26, 2021


    So I'm also assuming that Jared Kushner knew about it the whole time.
    — Ellen “got the vax wears the mask" Rosewall (@EllenRosewall) February 26, 2021


    This punk doesn't have Jared Kushner running cover for him anymore.
    — Barton Hall (@brtnhll77) February 26, 2021


    Time to put restrictions and sanctions on Americans doing business with Saudi Arabia.

    Time to shutdown Kushner and Mnuchin business deals
    — Roadrunner (@BeeepBeeep33) February 26, 2021


    So, what did Kushner and Trump get in exchange for protecting him? https://t.co/wR8e5zqjC4
    — Hudson River Croc (@HudsonRiverCroc) February 26, 2021


    Just follow the money. Time to subpoena Kushner's tax returns.
    — Janice (@Boomerbabe3) February 26, 2021


    Just follow the money. Time to subpoena Kushner's tax returns.
    — Janice (@Boomerbabe3) February 26, 2021


    Jared Kushner where are you?
    — IWriteLeft (@iwriteleft) February 26, 2021


    Let's get Kushner in on that “accountability".
    — Mena Ganey 🐇🐇 (@mena_ganey) February 26, 2021



    Let's get Kushner in on that “accountability".
    — Mena Ganey 🐇🐇 (@mena_ganey) February 26, 2021


    Now lets talk about exactly what role Jared Kushner played in this.
    — Bethany (@bethany1014) February 26, 2021


    What did Trump and Kushner know, and when did they know it?
    — Jeff Ralston 🥧🥧🍻😷 (@JeffR914) February 26, 2021


    im waiting for the part of the report that discloses how Trump and Kushner helped cover it up ...
    — Diana U (@sparkly0106) February 26, 2021


    US has released its damning report on Saudi crown prince culpability in murder.

    Do the Saudis hold any embarrassing data about Trump/Kushner?

    What wd be the Saudi royals' highest value use of such data if it existed? They have to be feeling angry and aggrieved right now.
    — David Frum (@davidfrum) February 26, 2021


    Trump used Jared Kushner as his criminal henchman to: 1) Create a cyber backdoors for our enemies, 2) Bilk the U.S. out of a much money and power as possible, 3) Pardon his father's crimes, 4) Cover up crimes in exchange for money and favors, etc. https://t.co/OorAXOM294
    — Marjorie Frazier (@MarjoriesBuzz) February 26, 2021

    Texas voters like Biden’s COVID-19 response better than his overall performance, UT/TT Poll finds

    Ross Ramsey, The Texas Tribune
    February 26, 2021

    President Joe Biden, who today is making his first visit to Texas since his January inauguration, starts his term with about the same numbers of voters giving him good and bad marks for job performance, according to the latest University of Texas/Texas Tribune Poll.

    Among registered Texas voters, 45% approve of the job he's doing and 44% disapprove. Those results include 30% who said they strongly approve of his performance and 39% who strongly disapprove. The partisan lines are strong: 80% of Republicans disapprove, while 89% of Democrats approve.

    "Election season always hardens partisan attitudes. That didn't end with the election," said James Henson, co-director of the poll and head of the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin. "I don't know that we ever got out of election mode."

    Biden's grades for responding to COVID-19 are better, with 49% approving what he's doing and 36% saying they disapprove. That's an improvement over his predecessor: In the October 2020 UT/TT Poll, 45% of voters approved Donald Trump's coronavirus response, while 48% did not — including 43% who disapproved strongly.

    "He's starting out, in a Republican state, with fairly respectable numbers," Daron Shaw, a government professor at UT-Austin and co-director of the poll, said of Biden.

    The assessment of Gov. Greg Abbott's COVID-19 response has improved a bit since October. In both polls, 44% said the governor is doing a good job, and the number who giving him bad marks has fallen 5 percentage points, to 41% from 46%. Public approval for Abbott's handling of the pandemic peaked at the beginning; in the April 2020 UT/TT Poll, 56% of Texas voters approved of his responses and 29% disapproved.

    The poll was in the field Feb. 12-18, when a massive winter storm battered the state and caused the state's electric grid to lose control of the power supply. The poll was being completed just as the state began to thaw and news of U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz's trip to Cancún surfaced. None of that news was evident in voters' ratings of Abbott and Cruz.

    The governor's numbers held steady, with 46% of Texas voters giving him an approving job review and 39% giving him a disapproving one. In October, his results were 47% – 40% — virtually the same.

    The same was true for Cruz: 45% positive and 43% negative in this poll, compared to 46% - 42% in October.

    U.S. Sen. John Cornyn got positive marks from 32% of voters, and negative marks from 42% — a more negative showing than either Cruz or Abbott. In October, right before he was reelected, Cornyn's job performance was rated positively by 39% and negatively by the same percentage.

    Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick's job review was flat: 37% of voters say he's doing a good job and 36% saying they disapprove of his work. The state's newest legislative leader, House Speaker Dade Phelan, a Beaumont Republican, elevated to that post by his peers just a few weeks ago, still hasn't made an impression on most Texas voters; 60% said either that they have a neutral or no assessment of how he's doing his job, while 22% gave him positive grades and 18% were negative.

    About two in five Texans, 39%, don't have a favorite branch of government, mentioned first here because that answer outranked the U.S. Supreme Court and the judicial branch, 35%; the president and the executive branch, 22%; and Congress and the legislative branch, 5%.

    With a Democrat in the White House, 42% of Democratic voters chose the executive branch as their favorite. Meanwhile, 50% of Republicans chose the courts. Among independents, 64% went with "don't know/no opinion" over any of the three branches. Congress fared poorly no matter who was responding. It's the favorite of 7% of Democrats, and 3% each of the independents and the Republicans.

    Congress remains notably unpopular: 22% of Texas voters approve of its job performance, and 57% disapprove — 43% of them strongly.

    Almost half of the voters who identified themselves as conservative — 46% — said the Republican elected officials in Texas are "conservative enough." But 32% said those officeholders are not conservative enough. Only 12% said they are too conservative.

    Among voters who identify themselves as liberals, 36% said the Democrats now in office are "liberal enough," 38% said they're not liberal enough and 9% said state Democratic officeholders are too liberal.

    The University of Texas/Texas Tribune internet survey of 1,200 registered voters was conducted from Feb. 12-18 and has an overall margin of error of +/- 2.83 percentage points. Numbers in charts might not add up to 100% because of rounding.

    Disclosure: The University of Texas at Austin has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

    READ IT: US intel report directly blames Saudi Crown Prince for approving killing of Jamal Khashoggi

    Brad Reed
    February 26, 2021

    The Office of the Director of National Intelligence has released a report pinning direct blame on Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman for approving a plan to kill Saudi-born journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

    The ODNI says its assessment of the Saudi leader's culpability rests on "the Crown Prince's control of decisionmaking in the Kingdom, the direct involvement of a key adviser and members of Muhammad bin Salman's protective detail in the operation, and the Crown Prince's support for using violent measures to silence dissidents abroad, including Khashoggi."

    Given that the Crown Prince has "absolute control" over security operations, the report states it "highly unlikely" that his subordinates would have carried out such an operation, which led to widespread international condemnation, on their own.

    The report concludes that "the Crown Prince viewed Khashoggi as a threat to the Kingdom and broadly supported using violent measures if necessary to silence him," although it added that "we do not know how far in advance Saudi officials decided to harm him."

    Read the whole report here (PDF).

     
    Trending
    Latest
    Videos

    'Worshipping the golden jackass': CPAC mocked for displaying giant gold Trump statue

    'No, I don't understand': Costco CEO stuns Lindsey Graham during disagreement over minimum wage increase

    If you think Marjorie Taylor Greene is nuts, you should meet her dad

    Donald Trump Jr. is the CPAC warm-up act for a speaker from a cult that believes its leader is a reincarnated alien

    GOP lawmaker's husband linked to Three Percenter pickup parked outside Capitol during insurrection

    The GOP is now the Soviet Communist Party circa 1979 — and headed for a similar fate: conservative

    Boehner says 'blame the wine' for his profane advice on what Ted Cruz should do to himself: report

    Fellow senators mock Ted Cruz’s infamous Cancun trip with a biting prank

    Republicans scramble to blame green energy as Texas freeze leaves their social Darwinist ideology in tatters

    'Where's Jared Kushner?' New intel report blaming Saudi prince for Khashoggi murder raises questions

    Texas voters like Biden’s COVID-19 response better than his overall performance, UT/TT Poll finds

    READ IT: US intel report directly blames Saudi Crown Prince for approving killing of Jamal Khashoggi

    'I think we need a new face': CPAC attendees aren't sold on Trump as the 2024 presidential nominee

    Stunningly hypocritical Republicans are now throwing their own voters under the bus

    Kelly Loeffler no longer WNBA team owner after she angers players with anti-BLM rants

    Kellyanne Conway trashed Trump behind his back and used leaks to survive the White House ‘Hunger Games’: report

    The View gangs up on 'troll' Marjorie Taylor Greene for mocking colleague’s child

    ‘Unhinged lunatic’: Ted Cruz mocked after 'embarrassing' himself with bizarrely over-the-top CPAC rant

    Ted Cruz at CPAC screams 'freedom!' at the top of his lungs -- and then keeps screaming

    WATCH: CPAC attendees surround Jim Acosta and chant 'CNN sucks!'

    WATCH: CPAC crowd erupts in jeers and boos after hosts ask them to wear masks

    Proud Boys leader throws pals under the bus for attacking Capitol during CNN interview

    'I'm tired of not winning!' Conservative blisters CPAC for worshipping one-term loser Trump

    Morning Joe drops the hammer on 'gutless' Kevin McCarthy for pandering to disgraced Trump

    WATCH LIVE: CPAC 2021 kicks off on Friday

    Alexei Navalny leads Russians in a historic battle against arbitrary rule, with words echoing Catherine the Great

    'A deal with the devil': Morning Joe's Mika slams Mitch McConnell for his change of heart on Trump

     
     

    Copyright © 2021 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email corrections@rawstory.com.

    Manage Preferences

    Thanks for your support!

    Did you enjoy Raw Story this year? Join us! We're offering RawStory ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.

    'A cult of losing': Conservatives torched for worshipping Trump even after he cost GOP everything

    Here's how Mary Trump helped the Manhattan DA track Uncle Donald's new patterns of tax fraud

    Embattled South Dakota DA was reading Joe Biden conspiracy theories on his phone when he killed pedestrian with his car

    Close
    Copy link