Quantcast
Connect with us

Controversial Sheriff and Trump DHS nominee David Clarke plagiarized parts of masters thesis: CNN

Published

on

Controversial Milwaukee Sheriff David Clarke — who was nominated last week for a post in President Donald Trump’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) — plagiarized sections of his masters thesis at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California.

CNN’s KFile reported Saturday evening that Clarke’s thesis on U.S. security fails to give proper attribution its sources a whopping 47 times.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rather than use quote marks to indicate where he was pulling from other sources, wrote Andrew Kaczynski, Christopher Massie and Nathan McDermott, Clarke cut and pasted passages from other works verbatim — a direct violation of the Naval Postgraduate School’s guidelines on academic integrity.

“If a passage is quoted verbatim, it must be set off with quotation marks (or, if it is a longer passage, presented as indented text), and followed by a properly formulated citation. The length of the phrase does not matter. If someone else’s words are sufficiently significant to be worth quoting, then accurate quotation followed by a correct citation is essential, even if only a few words are involved,” the guidelines state.

CNN said, “The school’s honor code defines plagiarism as ‘submitting material that in part or whole is not one’s own work without proper attribution. Plagiarism is further defined as the use, without giving reasonable and appropriate credit to or acknowledging the author or source, of another person’s original work, whether such work is made up of code, formulas, ideas, language, research, strategies, writing or other form(s).'”

Works that Clarke pulled passages from included: “a 2002 ACLU report about ‘The Government’s Demand for New and Unnecessary Powers After September 11,’ a 2003 ACLU report critical of the FBI’s records-collection practices, a 2007 ACLU report on ‘fusion centers,’ and a 2011 ACLU report on the need to overhaul secrecy laws.”

“Other sources Clarke lifted words from include: the 9/11 Commission Report, a 2011 article in the Homeland Security Affairs journal, the Pew Research Center, a 2012 report by the Constitution Project, a 2003 report by the US General Accounting Office, a 2011 Brennan Center report, a 2013 Washington Post article about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Comparative Homeland Security: Global Lessons, a textbook by Nadav Morag, and Safe Cities Project, a research paper published by the Manhattan Institute,” CNN said, as well as passages from George W. Bush’s memoir Decision Points.

ADVERTISEMENT

When contacted by CNN, the Naval Postgraduate Institute said in a statement from Lt. Cdr. Clint Phillips that said, “Like all academic institutions, the Naval Postgraduate School takes the integrity of our students’ work very seriously, perhaps even more than our peers given the unique nature of our mission and student body. Standard procedure to any formal accusation of plagiarism is to pull the student’s thesis, and perform an investigation into the validity of the claims.”

He continued, “The university’s academic conduct code, and our procedures in checking for plagiarism at the time of thesis submission, and following graduation, can change from year to year. In this particular case, we would be unable to determine any violation until the full investigation is complete.”

Clarke is wildly unpopular in Milwaukee. His powers as sheriff have been limited, but at the jail under his jurisdiction, two inmates and a newborn baby have died from neglect in recent years.

ADVERTISEMENT

Clarke gave a completely unhinged interview to CNN’s Don Lemon in 2016 in which he alleged that members of Black Lives Matter are terrorists who are trying to bring down the U.S. from within.

In the past, Clarke has accused BLM of inciting the murders of police officers, while also blaming riots in his home city of Milwaukee on the “questionable lifestyle choices” of the city’s black residents.

ADVERTISEMENT

 


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Mitch McConnell may let Republicans write Senate impeachment rules without Democratic votes

Published

on

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is plotting to shut out Democrats on impeachment if a bipartisan compromise on rules for the trial can't be reached.

The Kentucky Republican said this week that he hopes to reach an agreement on rules for the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, but he's also readying a "backup plan" in case he can't reach an agreement with Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, reported Vanity Fair.

“The first thing Sen. Schumer and I will do is see if there’s a possibility of agreement on a procedure,” McConnell said. “That failing, I would probably come back to my own members and say, ‘Okay, can 51 of us agree how we’re going to handle this?’”

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Fresno Bee burns Nunes to the ground in scathing editorial

Published

on

The editorial board of the Fresno Bee has written a scathing takedown of Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) for his extraordinary fealty to President Donald Trump, which the editors say is harming the country.

Specifically, the editorial accuses Nunes of forsaking his oath of office as a congressman to serve as Trump's most loyal toady on the House Intelligence Committee.

"As has been true for nearly all of Trump’s first term, Nunes has relinquished his proper role as an independent representative of Congress and has instead acted like a member of the Trump 2020 re-election team," the editorial states.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Republicans blundered badly as their own impeachment expert witness wrecked their defenses of Trump: columnist

Published

on

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee pinned their hopes on George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, their sole expert witness on the panel at the hearing on Wednesday, to discredit the impeachment probe into President Donald Trump.

But as anti-Trump conservative columnist Jennifer Rubin wrote for the Washington Post, even Turley's testimony ended up damaging the GOP more than Democrats, because he undercut one of the GOP's most solid narratives in defense of the president: that trying to extort Ukraine with military aid would not be impeachable even if it was proven.

Continue Reading