Voting expert roasts Trump fans' next scheme: ‘A super-fake audit after the fake-audit failed to be fake enough’
September 24, 2021, 4:41 PM ET
For customer support contact
support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to
corrections@rawstory.com.
Stories Chosen For You
'Nobody did their job': Man's death after cops failed to give him heart meds exposes 'major flaw'
June 03, 2023
Dexter Barry succumbed to cardiac arrest just three days after his release from a Florida jail, and his family believes his death could have been prevented had the jail staff adhered to his cry for help, NPR reports.
Per NPR, Barry's death, "which was first reported by The Tributary, has sparked major questions about the quality of health care overseen by the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office."
In addition to the late 54-year-old's family, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Florida also told NPR, "Dexter Barry's disturbing, preventable death from medical neglect highlights a major flaw in how America treats its carceral system. We urge state officials to investigate Mr. Barry's killing and pursue justice for his loved ones."
Florida pathologist Dr. Jose SuarezHoyos, "who conducted a private autopsy of Barry on behalf of Barry's family, told NPR," the 54-year-old "died from cardiac arrest that was caused by an acute rejection of the heart."
In body camera footage obtained by NPR, in his cry for help, Barry said, "I take rejection medicine for my heart transplant. I can't miss those doses."
NPR reports:
After experiencing a near-stroke in 2008, Barry waited for a new heart for 12 years, and even moved to Florida to increase his chances of getting the procedure, King said. Barry was determined to receive the treatment because he wanted to watch his son's children grow up, as well as see King have a child of her own. In 2020, the opportunity to possibly live a longer, healthier life came true.
Janelle King, Barry's daughter said, "The officer, the judge, the jail, the nurses, the medical team, nobody did their job. As a result, my father who waited 12 years for a transplant is not here."
Andrew Bonderud, the Barry family's attorney told NPR the family will "file a lawsuit against the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office soon," adding, "There were so many people who could have prevented Dexter Barry's death. It seems to me that one phone call to the right person from the right person would've made a difference."
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Okay, the House has passed the debt-ceiling deal, and the Senate will follow suit. So the economic crisis is over. Right?
Not quite, because another and more serious economic crisis is brewing: While the Fed continues to raise interest rates to counter inflation by slowing the economy, big corporations continue to raise prices. Greedflation is stalking the economy.
The latest data shows that the average company in the S&P 500 stock index increased its net profit margin from the end of last year. Wall Street analysts forecast that profit margins will keep expanding in the second half of this year.
The Fed has raised borrowing costs at 10 consecutive meetings, increasing its benchmark rate to over 5 percent. Yet inflation has barely slowed. Why? Because the Fed’s rate hikes barely affect big corporations that continue to raise prices to fatten their profits.
I want to emphasize that it’s their profit margins that continue to increase. Corporations aren’t raising prices to cover increased costs. The Producer Price Index dropped 2.3 percent for the 12 months through April. The prices of oil, transportation, food ingredients, and raw materials continue to drop as the shocks stemming from the pandemic and the war in Ukraine fade. Wage gains still lag behind price increases. Wages and salaries in the Employment Cost Index, a broader measure of worker compensation, have been trending downward for a year.
No, big corporations are raising prices because they can — because they have enough monopoly power to do so. With just a handful of companies dominating each market, it’s easy to implicitly agree they’ll all raise their prices.
They’re not plowing those profits back into investments that would make the economy more productive. They continue to sink them into stock buybacks, which reward executives and big investors but do nothing for the economy.
(By the way, corporate economists argue that businesses couldn’t be padding their profits; if they could, they would have done it before the inflation of the last two years. But businesses have been using the cover of inflation to justify price increases, so consumers accept them. According to Paul Donovan, chief economist at UBS Global Wealth Management, businesses “are confident that they can convince consumers that it isn’t their fault, and it won’t damage their brand.”)
Inflation is not being propelled by an overheated economy. It’s being propelled by overheated profits. So it makes no sense to fight inflation by trying to slow the economy with high interest rates. In fact, this strategy is dangerous — especially now that Congress and the administration are on the verge of reducing anticipated federal spending by about $55 billion next year and another $81 billion in 2025. This one-two punch will take the wind out of the job market but not out of corporate monopolies.
The good news is that even the establishment media is finally catching on. In just the past few weeks, both The Wall Street Journaland The New York Times have featured lead stories highlighting inflation driven in large part by corporations raising their prices to fatten their profits.
This opens space for shifting the burden of fighting inflation from workers and consumers to corporations.
As I’ve suggested before, instead of relying on the Fed to “tame” inflation via fewer jobs and lower wages, Democratic lawmakers and the Biden administration should seek legislation that puts more of the onus of fighting inflation on big corporations. Such legislation would:
- Allow the Justice Department to bust up monopolies (and prevent further consolidation through mergers and acquisitions) when three or fewer corporations have more than half the sales of a particular market.
- Direct the Federal Trade Commission to find that any such corporation has engaged in unlawful price gouging whenever it has raised prices higher than the rate of inflation, and impose a fine that would claw back those unlawful gains.
- Permit the Treasury Department to impose a windfall profits tax on large corporations, above a specific reasonable rate of return or profit margin.
If Republicans won’t go along, Biden and the Democrats should make this a major campaign issue for 2024.
They should ask the public: Do you want more jobs and higher wages, or do you want large corporations making fatter profits by raising prices?
CONTINUE READING
Show less
'Veteran sniper': NH man accused of terrorizing senator for 'blocking military promotions'
June 03, 2023
Brian Landry of New Hampshire has been "charged with threatening to assault, kidnap or murder a United States official," after terrorizing a U.S.senator via voicemail last month,The New York Times reports.
Per The Times, after hearing a U.S. senator "was blocking military promotions," the 66-year-old said in a voicemail to the lawmaker, "Hey stupid, I'm a veteran sniper. Unless you change your ways, I got my scope pointed in your direction and I’m coming to get you. You're a dead man walking."
The Times reports:
Elected officials, politicians and their families have faced a rise in threats over the past few years as violent political speech has become more prevalent. Such threats made in voice mail messages and via social media have sometimes become more concrete, as was the case last June, when a man, who was armed with a pistol, a knife and other weapons, said that he traveled to the home of Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh intending to kill the Supreme Court justice. In October, a man broke into the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco and struck her husband with a hammer, fracturing his skull.
The veteran told investigators he felt "extremely angry with certain politicians over their handling of important entitlement programs for veterans."
The Times reported that court records didn't name the Landry's apparent target.
Furthermore, NBC News reports, "After investigators informed him about the contents of the voicemail, Landry 'acknowledged he may have said those things, but denied any intentions or desire to commit violence' against the unnamed senator or anyone else."
According to The Times, Landry "is set to appear in the U.S. District Court in New Hampshire on July 12, according to court documents," and "could face penalties including up to 10 years in prison, along with three years of supervised release, and a fine of as much as $250,000."
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Copyright © 2023 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | Manage Preferences
For corrections contact corrections@rawstory.com, for support contact support@rawstory.com.
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}