Pandagon
NC: Alcoholic Beverage Commission head resigns after circulating racist email
The state's top liquor regulator, Doug Fox, is now the former top liquor regulator, as Governor Beverly Perdue demanded and received Fox's resignation after newspapers sent her a copy of the racist illustration Fox was shooting around on email.
The e-mail included an altered photo of the White House that turned the South Lawn into an enormous watermelon patch. The phrase, "There goes the neighborhood ..." was printed above the photo.The e-mail was sent from Fox's law firm address Nov. 14 -- 10 days after Barack Obama was elected president. The message, which had been forwarded multiple times by others before reaching Fox, contained no text other than the subject line, "how true."
..."I have accepted Doug Fox's letter of resignation," Perdue said. "E-mails and images of this nature are offensive and unacceptable."
Fox, who was paid $110,000 last year, offered to stay on and help his successor settle in. Perdue, who will appoint a new chairman, declined. "The resignation will be effective immediately," said David Kochman, Perdue's communications director.
Of course the obvious question is why do some public officials think that sending out stuff like this is not going to blow up in their faces? As I've said before, never, ever send "humor" around like this unless you are 100% certain that the all of the recipients of your missive share your rancid, bigoted sense of humor. In his case the recipient of the email was a lobbyist Bill Hester (who represents Southern Wine & Spirits, a major liquor distributor). He declined to speak to the media.
Fox also earns bonus points for *ssclown stupidity -- how could he not have seen or heard about the story about how this very same knee-slapping racist image was emailed around by Los Alamitos, California Mayor Dean Grose -- and how it cost him his job? I mean it wasn't as if it didn't make national news at the time...
You can see a copy of Fox's unapologetic resignation letter here.
Related:
* CA: Orange County bigot eruption - Los Alamitos mayor sends out racist email
Three Stories In Stupid
There is so much stupid in the world; all I can do is hope to bring it to light. Today, we shall analyze three works of dumb, each with its own particular je ne sais quoi that makes it worthy of mockery and ridicule.
A general conservative blogger method of reading statutes, laws or anything relating to how things actually work will generally fall prey to two undeniable canons of non-comprehension:
1.) They cannot read.
2.) This is compensated for by picking out the few trigger words which spark babbling outrage and then copying only those words in an effort to feel like they actually can read, like a high schooler who only read two pages of the English assignment but tries to make everything revolve around the one phrase he remembers if he gets called on.
Case in point: Cassy Fiano. In Texas, HB 3318 is being offered as a method of sentence mitigation for mothers convicted of murdering their infant children while suffering from post-partum depression.
Please note what I just said. Because it's what the bill says. Then note what Fiano says.
Of course, leave it to a rabid pro-abortionist like Jessica Ferrar to see otherwise. She’s a Texas state representative, recently honored by Planned Parenthood and the proud owner of a 100% NARAL approval rating. She’s currently trying to force through a bill that would make Catholic hospitals be required to dispense the morning-after pill. Her latest bright idea? To decriminalize infanticide.
But...what? Huh? The bill explicitly says that "the offense is a state jail felony". There is a criminal sentence. Is there a meaning of "decriminalize" that includes prison time for a criminal offense? Did I go to sleep and wake up in Ari Fleischer's head?
Are you sick to your stomach yet?
Yes, but not for the reasons you think.
Right now, murder of a child under the age of six in the state if Texas is capital murder. And this evil woman, Jessica Ferrar (who, by the way, calls herself a Catholic — yeah right), wants the punishment for murdering an infant to be little more than a slap on the wrist. And why? Because if the child is under a year old, they’re worth less than a child aged 1 - 6?
No, because some women provably suffer from often crippling depression brought on by birth in the first year following said birth.
Incidentally, the way that sentence will be perceived by Fiano? "Cripple women following birth. Obama's depression makes gay babies."
Alas, we must move on to example two. Leon H. Wolf at Redstate offers a "compromise" position on waterboarding, which is one of those in-no-way-clever analogies that some people try when they really shouldn't.
You see, we should make waterboarding safe, legal and rare! Like abortion! Because if you substitute one word for another, it's like you made an argument! For instance, "Welcome to Burger King, home of the abortion. How may I abort your fetus today?", or "I'm sorry, but you need to get up off your fucking abortion and take the trash out, you lazy sack of partial-birth", or, and this is my favorite, "I keep aborting my unborn child because the boss is so cheap, and I'm not leveled up enough dilation and extraction". See? Wit.
The comments, though, are the best part. For instance, comparing feminists to abortion clinic bombers. Or comparing waterboarding to colonoscopy prep.
And now, number three.
William Jacobson, who joins Ann Althouse as one of the most inexplicably tenured people in America, attacks Obama because he got dijon mustard on his burger yesterday. The idiot brigade is right there with him, demanding that the MSM bring us the vital details of his food elitism, lest the nation somehow think that this Prince Akeem motherfucker is one of us. (And do you ever get the feeling that if they could stand black people, Eriq La Salle's character from that movie would be their hero?)
Now, Ray's Hell Burger serves gourmet burgers. Really great gourmet burgers. They have imported cheeses and aged beef and shit, which, incidentally, you'd hope they would have access to in this global capitalist economy that we're supposed to love so goddamn much.
So why would you attack Obama for asking for mustard you can get at the grocery store, especially referencing the exact line of attack that McCain and the mainstream media used against Obama for months?
Oh, because it was a joke!
I think Joeyess needs to get a life and get out of the house, and if so, perhaps he'd understand a little sarcasm is a good thing. It certainly seemed to work for the left when W was in office but I guess the One is off limits. We're seeing this with Leno and other comedians who are scared to poke fun at Obama unlike how they have treated every other President. Lighten up a little, and perhaps you'd be happier. And by the way, there is a truth here, and it's about Obama's supporters more than Obama.
Yep, so when he attacked Obama for eating fancy mustard in a way that conservatives have been doing for years (including Bush attacking Kerry for not eating his cheesesteak in a way that nobody from Philly does after their first time, because Cheeze Wiz is some sort of melted industrial solvent), it was all just a joke, and really about how nobody makes fun of Obama, even though he was actually making fun of...ah, fuck. I'm never aborting this fetal heartbeat again.
Wherein your blogger crosses multiple time zones into Euroweenieland to see Devo for the third time
In case regular readers haven't noticed, I like the band Devo.
My friend that I went to San Diego with to see Devo play a horse track (which is so devo) and who was also with me and Marc to see them play SXSW, well, he convinced me to go to England with him to see them play at another installment of the ongoing concert series All Tomorrow's Parties. Now Naomi Wolf can really feel justified in hinting that "young" feminists of 31 are unserious people who spend their time hanging out with Austin hipsters at three day concerts.
This is cool on many levels, including one I just thought of yesterday as I was listening to "Sound Opinions", and the hosts were talking about how hard it was for so long to get any albums from the Velvet Underground at all. And now there's a concert series named after one of their songs. A small but satisfying justice.
So, we've been planning this trip for over 6 months now, and tomorrow I'm leaving boyfriend and cats behind, and we're going to fly out to London to meet two more friends, and then we're going out to the coast to spend three days at this concert. And then we're going back to London, and because we bothered to spend the money to get over there, we're going to go to Paris for a few more days. This will end up being the longest trip I've taken, possibly ever---11 whole days. It's a little crazy, but as Marc said to me, what exactly is the point if you don't do stuff like this when you get the opportunity?
I have no idea how much access I'll have to internet from tomorrow until I'm back on May 18th. I'm assuming some hotels we're staying at will have some, but even so, I imagine blogging will be sporadic at best. I will try, depending. I certainly don't want to punk out entirely on sharing new music that we learn about at ATP, so I'll be taking notes and trying to share some discoveries. The good news is that Jesse's semester happens to be ending right as I'm leaving, and I'm sure he's aching to use his newly discovered free time towards more blogging, since that's what he told me.
Pandagonians, I now beseech you: Tell me what my friend and I can do in London and Paris that is hip and awesome and not necessarily the same tourist stuff (though we're dorks and will be doing some of that, too). We're music geeks, so leads in that direction are especially appreciated (both stores and clubs), but we also like to eat. I know, scandalous. I've never been to France, and I don't speak French (I know, scandalous), but I want to make nice with our socialist surrender monkey friends who just happen to know how to pronounce my name correctly. So tips on how to make that work are much appreciated.
Miss California shows everyone what God, er, the pageant gave her
You knew it was only a matter of time before another thing that Maggie Gallagher's pious National Organization for Marriage touches blows up in its face. Nude photos of Miss Pageant-Paid-for-Jugs-for-Jesus have surfaced and the devoted "Christian" is forced to explain herself. Of course she's just a victim, right? Even a bible-beating homophobic gal's got to make a living. (PopCrunch):
Alicia Jacobs, Entertainment Reporter at KVBC in Las Vegas, has seen all six of the photos and says some are much more revealing. Alicia believes the flicks may have been taken after Carrie’s pageant-financed breast augmentation about six weeks ago.Hmmm…These explosive pictures could be devastating for Miss California, whose anti-gay marriage campaign recently resulted in a partnership with the National Organization for Marriage and helped to make her increasingly popular with right-wing conservatives.
And the fun made the Today Show:
Miss Prejean's statement:
“I am a Christian, and I am a model. Models pose for pictures, including lingerie and swimwear photos. Recently photos taken of me as a teenager have been released surreptitiously to a tabloid Web site that openly mocks me for my Christian faith. I am not perfect, and I will never claim to be. But these attacks on me and others who speak in defense of traditional marriage are intolerant and offensive. While we may not agree on every issue, we should show respect for others’ opinions and not try to silence them through vicious and mean-spirited attacks.”
Driven By An Unknown Force To Change History For The Better
There may have been more articles written about people not telling jokes about Obama than there have been actual jokes about Obama.
What's inexplicable about this continual and terrible line of stories is that not a single one of the comedians complaining that nobody tells jokes about Obama seems to be making an effort to make jokes about Obama - and if they are, they usually fail not because of some fear they have of being declared racist, but instead because they're fucking bad at jokes.
Of course, there is something to this I-don't-wanna-be-racist idea. Political comedians aren't telling a lot of jokes about Obama is that the first people to fill in the gap of anti-Obama humor were generally crazy-ass racists sending you e-mails about how Obama is going to walk out for the State of the Union with a pick in his hair or how he's going to be missing briefings because he's got to find a place to put down his prayer mat. Mainstream political humor is nothing if not trail-following rather than trailblazing; Jay Leno will be telling Lewinsky jokes until she's elected Secretary General of the United Nations. When the main model for Obama mockery sits one or two steps removed from (or in the case of Glenn Beck, one step past) the worries that he's going to turn the Rose Garden into a cotton field, it's hard to get any popular momentum for the allegedly funny things about the guy.
Nobody wants to laugh at something that makes them feel uncomfortably close to being their own racist uncle. That gets into all sorts of weird incest/time-travel shit, and this is not Backwoods Quantum Leap.
Anti-science watch: Jenny McCarthy has her own show
Anti-science warriors, who are beginning to cross ideological boundaries, have just won a major media battle. Anti-medicine, pro-disease quack Jenny McCarthy is getting her own TV show, at the behest of Oprah Winfrey.
Following in the heels of Dr. Phil and Rachael Ray, McCarthy has signed a deal with Harpo Productions to develop multi-platform projects, including a syndicated talk show and a blog, according to The Hollywood Reporter.
McCarthy's blog launched Friday on Oprah.com and already features three entries from the actress.
In recent years, McCarthy has been a frequent guest on Winfrey's talk show, discussing her efforts in helping her son, Evan, combat autism. She also appeared this past Friday as part of Winfrey's Friday Live panel.
This is a complete disaster. For reasons I can't quite understand, Jenny McCarthy is dedicated to fighting medical science on multiple fronts on the theory that she, as a celebrity who has given birth, understands way more about disease and biology than mere doctors and scientists, with their facts and their evidence. I know that there was some hope expressed that now that Dr. Andrew Wakefield, who published the study that supposedly showed a link between autism and vaccines, has been exposed as a fraud, the anti-vaccination movement would wither away and die. Unfortunately, I've been watching the anti-choice and creationist movements for a long time, so I know that cranks not only don't care about the facts, scientific evidence against them just redoubles their enthusiasm for the cause, because now they can feel like they're fighting reality itself. Overcoming a foe like that is a feather in your cap indeed. And McCarthy's acquisition of a TV show demonstrates that I was right---if they can't win on the facts, they'll dominate the media discourse.
The first three blog posts at McCarthy's blog are the sort of thing that give people who promote healthy eating a bad name. It's not that she's wrong to suggest that eating a bunch of sugar isn't good for you. But this is coming from McCarthy, who actually claims to have cured her son of autism through obsessively monitoring his diet.
We believe what helped Evan recover was starting a gluten-free, casein-free diet, vitamin supplementation, detox of metals, and anti-fungals for yeast overgrowth that plagued his intestines. Once Evan's neurological function was recovered through these medical treatments, speech therapy and applied behavior analysis helped him quickly learn the skills he could not learn while he was frozen in autism.
Her article is hard to read, seeing as how it's laced with her determined belief that her son "caught" autism. The evidence is piling up quickly for the best theory regarding autism, which is that it's genetic. Even if and when they conclusively prove that autism is genetic, though, McCarthy and her comrades will not give up claiming you get it from "toxins" in vaccines. That's just not how anti-science nuts operate. They need to believe in their heart of hearts that they're smarter than people who actually know what they're talking about. I'm not surprised that McCarthy is obsessed with food to the point where she thinks about it in near-magical terms, either. Women are already deluged with all these pressures to eat and not eat and be able to eat a lot without gaining an ounce and know how to cook but know how to say no and find that perfect diet solution. Add to that a career where it's not important merely to be thin, but to be perfectly thin with no bumps or wrinkles, and food is going to move from being a constant issue to a real obsession. But that doesn't make her an expert, nor does it mean you can cure someone of autism by refusing to feed them wheat.
The food quackery is a minor issue compared to her anti-vaccination crap, though. Despite her and Jim Carrey's claims to desire "green" vaccinations (whatever that means), they've made it incredibly clear that there will ever be a time when they accept any proof whatsoever that vaccines are safe. Unfortunately, McCarthy's schtick about how she's a mom and gosh, don't we moms know better than anyone else about anything (even though we have an endearing humility) is really appealing to a lot of people who are in charge of small children. Hiding behind the feelings of parents of autistic kids to push this nonsense is even more despicable. People aren't well served by being lied to, and the only people out there really doing anything to fight autism in the reality-based world are the much-despised and spat upon scientists and doctors who actually fight disease, including those that you fight off with vaccines.
The good news is that despite the economic and celebrity power of the anti-vaccination movement, some people are bravely fighting back, even though they know that even bringing up the subject means that anti-vaccination folks will try to wear them into shutting up through relentless bullshitting and guilt trips. They had a Momversation video about it, even though it's just inviting trouble:
It's imperfect, of course. There's all this discussion about "beliefs" instead of facts, and suggestions that someone is "researching" something if they read a whole bunch of unscientific, fact-free screeds and believe those above the evidence-based information out there. But even as they hedge and try to avoid insulting people who think this is a matter of "belief" instead of facts, they make the important points: not vaccinating your kids is stupid, there's no science on your side, and the guy who had the one study that seemed to find a link between vaccinations and autism is a fraud. We need to see more of this, and less of Jenny McCarthy.
Michael Steele agrees to be neutered by his masters at the RNC
This is just a sad minstrel show at this point. Why is Michael Steele continually allowing himself to be publicly humiliated? Does the job of Top Tool pay that well?
RNC Chair Michael Steele has reached an agreement with dissident party members to work through their differences over proposed rules that would rein in his power to spend GOP money, Republican Party of Wisconsin Chair Reince Priebus told WisPolitics.Several RNC members introduced the resolutions in the name of good governance, but Steele backers have bristled as the proposals, dismissing them as an attempt to undercut the chair's authority.
...Priebus told WisPolitics later Friday night that Steele was willing to live with rules that help reinforce the transparency that Steele has been trying to instill in the party since taking over.
"But Michael is not going to be handcuffed," Priebus said.
It's more like he'll have a Taser pointed at him by party folks to keep him in line. Steele, for his part, would only say
"Those who still want to wallow in name-calling and blaming and finger-pointing are welcome to do that. But they can do that without me."
Just pitiful.
Related:
* Uh oh -- RNC's Steele may lose control of party purse strings
Iowa National Guard will boot married gays; former drill sergeant -- don't let them near the guns
This is another example of why Don't Ask, Don't Tell is ridiculous and why Congress should repeal it. If a gay couple gets legally married in Iowa, and, let's say, puts the announcement in the paper, if one of them is in the National Guard that's all it takes to be discharged. This of course applies to any state where gay and lesbian couple can legally get hitched under state law. (Des Moines Register):
The federal law, approved by Congress in 1993, takes precedence over the Iowa Supreme Court ruling in April that legalized same-sex marriage, according to legal experts. The ruling struck down Iowa's Defense of Marriage Act, which had limited marriage to a man and a woman.The Iowa National Guard is prevented from implementing the Iowa Supreme Court's ruling for its personnel because it is a federally recognized military organization, said Lt. Col. Gregory Hapgood Jr., the Iowa National Guard's public affairs officer.
"We are a microcosm of society," Hapgood said. "We have gay people in the Iowa National Guard. But under that policy, that is not the test. It is about conduct, not about whether you are gay."
As it is with all these articles, the newspaper feels compelled to present the anti-gay views of former service members, not those currently serving.
The Rev. Skip Hansen of Eldora, a former Army Reserve drill sergeant and a leader of the Iowa Baptist Conference, said allowing openly gay soldiers to serve in the military is not only immoral but impractical in a highly disciplined military culture focused on life-and- death matters. To permit homosexuals to have lovers within a military unit would create dangerous tensions among people who carry weapons, he said.
What on earth is this man talking about - the homos are going to come out, guns ablazing at their peers? This insanity is right out of the discredited Elaine Donnelly playbook.
And "activist judge" is code for "thinks women are people"
Well, according to Orrin Hatch, that is. When asked about some of Obama's comments about what he looks for in a judicial nominee, Hatch indicated that he and all other Republicans would treat anyone that Obama nominates like she was Andrea Dworkin rolled up into Karl Marx, and said:
"Well, it's a matter of great concern. If he's saying that he wants to pick people who will take sides -- he's also said that a judge has to be a person of empathy. What does that mean? Usually that's a code word for an activist judge.
The projection going on is immense. It's hard to follow along, but to simplify---the debate is over whether or not we should appoint judges who think women are breeding machines who can be told, like Justice Kennedy did, that we're too stupid to know that we'd rather die to symbolically honor the seed planted inside us than live, which we only think we want to do. But even this is just a stand-in for a whole host of issues---obviously, those who think the government should officially treat women as sub-people tend to be callous hierarchical thinkers across the board, quick to support racial discrimination, sexual harassment, and abusing government power to enrich the rich at the expense of workers.
Obama was being straightforward, in other words. To lack the moral good sense that you need to define human rights so they include all people is to lack empathy. But, conservatives abhor straightforward language (except in the privacy of their own homes of little-trafficked blogs), and for the understandable reason that being blunt means fessing up to this appalling lack of empathy. So, Hatch hopes by mislabeling straightforward language as code language, he can smuggle in code language that gets taken seriously in this new topsy-turvy world where up is down. And we really mean topsy-turvy. If the Republicans do what Hatch indicates---make anti-choice sentiment even more central to their agenda than it is---then we can expect every single nomination's pro-choice views to be treated like evidence that they are scandalously left wing and so far out of the mainstream that they might as well be suggesting rounding up all men and putting them to sea.
This is more topsy-turvy bullshit. Even though Americans aren't quite on board with the "women are people" agenda, 61% are against banning abortion, though the majority would like to see laws like "you have to tell your husband", though it's unclear if they realize that means that you have to tell your husband even if he beats you.* What this means is that abortion rights are important even to some people who reject women's equality. Which means that it's far from the "left wing" position, but is actually the moderate position. People don't think abortion is murder. The moderates generally have some ugly opinions about who gets an abortion---they favor restrictions that make it a punishing, miserable situation so that you get what's coming to you, you hussy---but they think it should be legal at the end of the day. Attempts to paint the basic pro-choice position as radical are missing the mark by a mile.
What this means is that no one Obama could appoint will be treated as anything less than a threat to the nation itself by Republicans. If we play this right, we can both get who we want and further marginalize the Republican party. The main thing is to avoid the urge to find someone conservative in the hopes that Republicans won't fight this to the death. All you get then is the same fight, and you have a less than ideal candidate. Since the fight is coming no matter what, then we should make this someone worth fighting for.
*I have my questions about this, though. I think a lot of people get confused about the difference between ideal situations and social customs, and what the law should force you to do. It's a far different thing to say, "You should tell your husband" and "The law should force you to get him to sign off on it". It's like the difference between saying thank you when someone gives you something, and being forced by law to do so. A large percentage of people, if you asked them if the law should require you to say thank you, would get confused about this distinction and say yes. Without thinking about how that means you have to thank someone who gives you a punch on the nose. There's also an ingrained lack of generosity to women that shows up in these questions. In real life, a lot of women avoid telling the man who got her pregnant in order to spare him the burden. Women are in the habit of treating certain things like they're just not men's problem, and contraception is right up there (a LOT of men are completely oblivious to it, figuring that it goes into the same category as knowing how to cook and scrub toilets, which is that it's part of the subterranean women's world they don't have to know anything about), so it's easy to push abortion into the same category. I sympathize with any woman who feels that it might just be easier not to tell him and get this done alone, because having to hold his hand through it is just one more item on the To-Do list. In a sexist society, this gets interpreted as malice.
Video: Dems 'protect pedophiles' but not the troops
Here we go, as the GOP knows its fortunes are going down the tubes, they have to resort to the usual bullsh*t lies, twisting the hearings on hate crimes legislation to suggest that Congressional Dems "support protecting pedophiles" and not troops. Of course the fact that members of the military have not been systematically singled out as a group targeted by hate crimes is irrelevant, but facts don't matter to them.
The fact is that during debate over this bill the GOP tried to add all sorts of demographic groups that also haven't been the target of hate crimes, like pregnant women, senior citizens, etc. in order to try to derail the legislation -- it didn't work. But you see, 2010 is coming up quickly and the party has no ideas to help out Congressional candidates.
Considering the party's history of enabling and even promoting the pedophiles, rapists, serial adulterers, and sexual predators in its midst, all while projecting piety, it would be refreshing to see the Republicans to actually try to win on the issues. However, this level of desperation shows that they don't think they can sell their ideas to anyone, so it's back to the tried-and-true, garden variety extremist scare-tactics. Who, aside from the 20-25% hardcore fringe, will take this stuff seriously?
Jeb on flailing GOP: give up Reagan worship, the party has no strategy
Talk about mixed messages. Just yesterday I blogged about the drop of a new video promoting the GOP's latest effort to rebrand its tired-*ss self, The National Council for a New America, which relied heavily on the imagery of the Reagan "Morning in America" commercials, and even included shots of the Reagan (I included them in the graphic at right), and even Ike!
So with its mostly male, pale, old, retread band of GOP brothers of the NCNA on the road to solicit ideas from "the people," Jeb Bush actually undercuts the mission video by telling the party to move on. Even worse, (and from my POV, hilariously), admits that the Republican party has no strategy, and has no idea how to resurrect itself other than to copy the Dems.
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said Saturday that it's time for the Republican Party to give up its "nostalgia" for the heyday of the Reagan era and look forward, even if it means stealing the winning strategy deployed by Democrats in the 2008 election."You can't beat something with nothing, and the other side has something. I don't like it, but they have it, and we have to be respectful and mindful of that," Mr. Bush sai
..."So our ideas need to be forward looking and relevant. I felt like there was a lot of nostalgia and the good old days in the [Republican] messaging. I mean, it's great, but it doesn't draw people toward your cause," Mr. Bush said.
"From the conservative side, it's time for us to listen first, to learn a little bit, to upgrade our message a little bit, to not be nostalgic about the past because, you know, things do ebb and flow."
Man, Jeb, it's pretty clear that if you stray from the current sorry messaging that your party leader Rush Limbaugh will erupt -- and you will have to apologize. Your peers don't know how to listen.
The problem that party faces is that they can't let go of their hero ghosts from the past. Who can blame them? People would be rolling on the floor if they included more contemporary presidents as models for the future of the GOP -- Nixon, Bush I or heaven help them, Bush II.
Aside from the former Dear Leader, most of the voters they are trying to reach see Nixon and Poppy as fossil figures from history books as well. I don't see how the GOP can extract themselves from its conundrum when it is addicted to lies and fear and smear as a "strategy."
Video: Republican rebuilding project launches -- same old, same old
The National Council for a New America, formed to try to find a way to sell failed ideas to the American public in new packaging, has released its mission video, and it's a doozy.
It evokes the imagery of the Reagan "Morning in America" commercials, but the whole thing really falls apart when they start showing the parade of mostly male, pale, old, retread Republicans leading the mission to revitalize the party. It's obvious by the line up that it's going to be the same old sh*t sandwich.
Notably absent in the commercial is RNC chair Michael Steele. They had to rely on Bobby Jindal to provide color.
Copyright © 2025 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 |
Masthead
|
Privacy Policy
|
Manage Preferences
|
Debug Logs
For corrections contact
corrections@rawstory.com
, for support contact
support@rawstory.com
.